Editorial genesis
From comparing texts (product) to interpreting rewritings (process)
Rudolf Mahrer | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Rossana De Angelis | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Andrea Del Lungo | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Almuth Grésillon | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Jean-Louis Lebrave | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Valentine Nicollier Saraillon | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Thierry Poibeau | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Frédérique Mélanie-Becquet | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
Bénédicte Vauthier | “Manuscript – Linguistics – Cognition” team ITEM (ENS | CNRS) LATTICE (CNRS | ENS | Université Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3)
In literary genetics, “editorial genetics” deals with the “public life” of texts, whereas the writing process is affected by edition and diffusion. Editorial genetics frequently has to deal with cases of “editorial rewriting”: in the literary domain for example, authors frequently modify previously published works, so that several versions may co-exist. We are especially interested in Balzac’s La Bourse (translated in English as The Purse) since we know three authorized versions of this specific work.By comparing different texts associated with a single work, the literary geneticist is facing different products that are themselves the result of a writing process. However, different specificities should be outlined: (1) the writing process does not leave any trace: we just have access to different products/texts and (2) since the texts we compare seem to be achieved, differences must be referred, not to programmatic or temporary linguistic structures, but to the reconfiguration of a pre-existing textuality.Do such products still reflect the processes that have given birth to them? Does the comparison between two texts considered as variations of a same text give access to this transformation’s processes? After describing the objects of this particular textual comparison and the terminology that permits to give an account of such phenomenon, this contribution suggests to express these questions differently, as a matter of poetics of transitions between texts, or, further digging, an hermeneutics of the transition between texts.
References (22)
References
de Biasi, Pierre-Marc. 2005 [2000]. La Génétique des textes. Paris: Nathan.
Bourdaillet, Julien, Jean-Gabriel Ganascia, and Jean-Louis Lebrave. 2009. “Topologie et génétique textuelles: un dialogue médié par la machine.” Lexicometrica 9 special issue: unnumbured (available online: [URL]).
Culioli, Antoine. 1983. “Préface.” In La genèse du texte: les modèles linguistiques, ed. by Jean-Louis Lebrave, Catherine Fuchs, Almuth Grésillon, Jean Peytard, and Josette Rey-Debove, 9–12. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Falconer Graham. 1969. “Le travail du style dans les révisions de La Peau de chagrin.” In L’Année balzacienne: 71–106.
Ferrer, Daniel. 2011. Logiques du brouillon. Modèles pour une critique génétique. Paris: Seuil.
Fuchs, Catherine. 1983. “Eléments pour une approche énonciative de la paraphrase dans les brouillons de manuscrits.” In La genèse du texte: les modèles linguistiques, ed. by Jean-Louis Lebrave, Catherine Fuchs, Almuth Grésillon, Jean Peytard, and Josette Rey-Debove, 73–102. Paris: CNRS Éditions.
Grésillon, Almuth. 1994. Éléments de critique génétique. Lire les manuscrits modernes. Paris: PUF.
Grésillon, Almuth. 2007. “‘Nous avançons toujours sur des sables mouvants.’ Espaces et frontières de la critique génétique.” In La création en acte. Devenir de la critique génétique, ed. by Paul Gifford, and Marion Schmid, 29–40. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
Heiden, Serge. 2010. “The TXM Platform: Building Open-Source Textual Analysis Software Compatible with the TEI Encoding Scheme.” In Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 24), ed. by Ryo Otoguro, Kiyoshi Ishikawa, Hiroshi Unemoto, Kei Yoshimoto, and Yasunari Harada, 389–398. Sendai: Tohoku University.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychly, Pavel Smrz, and David Tugwell. 2004. “The Sketch Engine.” In Proceedings of EURALEX, ed. by Geoffrey Williams, and Sandra Vessier, 105–116. Lorient: Université de Bretagne Sud.
Lafon, Pierre. 1980. “Sur la variabilité de la fréquence des formes dans un corpus.” Mots 1: 27–165.
Lebart, Ludovic, André Salem, and Lisette Berry. 1997. Exploring Textual Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Leblay, Christophe, and Gilles Caporossi. 2014. Temps de l’écriture. Enregistrements et représentations. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Lebrave, Jean-Louis. 1983. “Lecture et analyse du brouillon.” Langages 69: 11–23.
Lebrave, Jean-Louis. 2009. “Manuscrits de travail et linguistique de la production écrite.” Modèles linguistiques 30: 13–21.
Lewis, Ricki. 2005. Human Genetics: Concepts and Applications. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Mahrer, Rudolf, and Valentine Nicollier Saraillon. 2015. “Les brouillons font-ils texte? Le cas des plans pré-rédactionnels de C. F. Ramuz.” In Faire texte. Unité(s) et (dis)continuité, ed. by Jean-Michel Adam, (to be published). Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
Peytard, Jean. 1993. “D’une sémiotique de l’altération.” Configurations discursives, Semen 8. Retrieved on 8 April 2014. URL: [URL]
Schmid, Helmut. 1994. “Probabilistic Part-of-Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees.” In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, ed. by Harold Somers, and Danny Jones, 44–49. Manchester: NeMLap.
Souchier, Emmanuël. 2007. “Formes et pouvoirs de l’énonciation éditoriale.” Communication et langage 154: 23–38.
Vachon, Stéphane. 1997. “Les enseignements des manuscrits d’Honoré de Balzac. De la variation contre la variante.” Genesis 11: 61–80.
Vachon, Stéphane. 2009. “Perspectives en génétique balzacienne.” In Balzac, Flaubert. La genèse de l’œuvre et la question de l’interprétation, [Proceedings of the Second International Conference, 14–16 December 2007, Nagoya], ed. by Kazuhiro Matsuzawa, 35–45. Nagoya, Japan: Graduate School of Letters, Nagoya University.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Pereira, Elsa
2024.
The materiality of typescripts in Pedro Homem de Mello’s writing practice.
Diacrítica 38:1
► pp. 117 ff.
Kroll, Jeri
2018.
The creative writing doctoral thesis: insights from genetic criticism.
New Writing 15:2
► pp. 148 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018.
Références bibliographiques. In
Le processus de textualisation [
Champs linguistiques, ],
► pp. 237 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.