Cover not available
Part of
Writing(s) at the Crossroads: The process–product interface
Edited by Georgeta Cislaru
[Not in series 194] 2015
► pp. 185–202

Writing, literate activity, semiotic remediation

A sociocultural approach

| University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
This chapter sketches a sociocultural framework for understanding writing, particularly exploring the way notions of literate activity (Prior 1998) and semiotic remediation (Prior, Hengst, Roozen, & Shipka 2006; Prior & Hengst 2010) maintain a distinct interest in both written artifacts and associated actions that are dialogically dispersed across people, tools, times and places. Drawing in particular on traditions grounded in the work of Vygotsky and Voloshinov, this approach argues for seeing writing as chronotopically laminated trajectories. Theoretical and methodological implications of this approach are illustrated by reviewing a line of research that has investigated writing as situated, mediated, and dispersed. The chapter concludes with key implications of this approach for the research, teaching, and practice of writing.
Keywords: chronotopes, semiotics, sociocultural theory, writing research, writing theory
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.10pri
References (48)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Patrick, Gail Hawisher, and Cynthia Selfe. 2012. Transnational Literate Lives in Digital Times. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Available at [URL]Google Scholar
Bloomaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Lauren. 2011. “Resisting Age Bias in Digital Literacy Research.” College Composition and Communication 62(4): 586–607.Google Scholar
Cole, Michael, and Yrjo Engeström. 1993. “A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition.” In Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, ed. by Gavriel Salomon, 111–138. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Elam, Kimberly. 2001. Geometry of Design: Studies in Proportion and Composition. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Emig, Janet. 1971. The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Flower, Linda, and John Hayes. 1981. “A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.” College Composition and Communication 32(4): 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraiberg, Steven. 2010. “Composition 2.0: Toward a Multilingual and Multimodal Framework.” College Composition and Communication 62(1): 100–126.Google Scholar
Galbraith, David, and Gert Rijlaarsdam. 1999. “Effective Strategies for the Teaching and Learning of Writing.” Learning & Instruction 1999(9): 93–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1996. “Shadow Conversations.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by Michael Silverstein and Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Karsten, Andrea. 2011. “Chronotopes in Writing: Excerpts from a Case Study.” Tätigkeitstheorie – Journal für tätigkeitstheoretische Forschung in Deutschland (Activity Theory – Journal of Activity-Theoretical Research in Germany) 5: 87–120.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay. 2000. “Across the Scales of Time: Artifacts, Activities, and Meanings in Ecosocial Systems.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 7(4): 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, Martin. 2005. “The Social and Historical Context of Writing Research.” In Handbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald, 11–27. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Olinger, Andrea. 2014. “On the Instability of Disciplinary Style: Common and Conflicting Metaphors and Practices in Text, Talk, and Gesture.” Research in the Teaching of English 48(4): 453–478.Google Scholar
Olive, Thierry, Rui Alexandre Alves, and São Luís Castro. 2009. “Cognitive Processes in Writing during Pause and Execution Periods.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 21(5): 758–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles. 1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Volume 2 (1893–1913). Ed. The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Perrin, Daniel. 2014. The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul. 1991. “Contextualizing Writing and Response in a Graduate Seminar.” Written Communication 8(3): 267–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “Tracing Authoritative and Internally Persuasive Discourses: A Case study of Response, Revision, and Disciplinary Enculturation.” Research in the Teaching of English 29(3): 288–325.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Literate activity and Disciplinarity: The Heterogeneous (Re)production of American Studies around a Graduate Seminar.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 4(4): 275–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Tracing Process: How Texts Come into Being.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analysis of Texts and Textual Practices, ed. by Charles Bazerman, and Paul Prior, 167–200. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2006. “A Sociocultural Theory of Writing.” In The Handbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles A. MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald, 54–66. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. “From Speech Genres to Mediated Multimodal Genre Systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the Question of Writing.” In Genre in a Changing World, ed. by Charles Bazerman, Adair Bonini, and Deborah Figueredo, 17–34. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
. 2010. “Remaking IO: Semiotic Remediation in the Design Process.” In Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice, ed. by Paul Prior, and Julie Hengst, 206–234. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Julie Hengst. 2010. “Introduction: Exploring Semiotic Remediation.” In Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice, ed. by Paul Prior, and Julie Hengst, 1–23. Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul, Julie Hengst, Kevin Roozen, and Jody Shipka. 2006. “‘I’ll Be the Sun’: From Reported Speech to Semiotic Remediation Practices.” Text and Talk 26(6): 733–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Karen Lunsford. 2007. “History of Reflection and Research on Writing.” In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text, ed. by Charles Bazerman, 81–96. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Spencer Schaffner. 2011. “Bird Identification as a Family of Activities: Motives, Mediating Artifacts, and Laminated Assemblages.” Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 39(1): 51–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Jody Shipka. 2003. “Chronotopic Lamination: Tracing the Contours of Literate Activity.” In Writing Selves, Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, ed. by Charles Bazerman, and David Russell, 180–238. Available at the WAC Clearinghouse [URL]Google Scholar
Prior, Paul, and Steven Thorne. 2014. “Research Paradigms: Beyond Product, Process, and Social Activity.” In Handbook of Writing and Text Production, ed. by Eva-Maria Jakobs, and Daniel Perrin, 31–54. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roozen, Kevin. 2009. “Fan Fic-ing” English Studies: A Case Study Exploring the Interplay of Vernacular Literacies and Disciplinary Engagement.” Research in the Teaching of English 44(2): 136–169.Google Scholar
Scribner, Sylvia. 1997. Mind and Social Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheridan(-Rabideau), Mary. 2008. Girls, Feminism, and Grassroots Literacy: Activism in the Girl Zone. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Shipka, Jody. 2011. Toward a Composition Made Whole. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Shipka, Jody and Bill Chewning. 2007. “Live Composition: Four Variations of a Telling.” In Re-Situating and Re-Mediating the Canons: A Cultural-Historical Remapping of Rhetorical Activity, ed. by Paul Prior, Janine Solberg, Patrick Berry, Hannah Bellwoar, Bill Chewning, Karen Lunsford, Liz Rohan, Kevin Roozen, Mary Sheridan, Jody Shipka, Derek Van Ittersum, and Joyce Walker. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 11.3. Available at [URL]Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1974. “The Social Construction of Documentary Reality.” Sociological Inquiry 44(4): 257–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. Ladislav Matejka and Irwin Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotksy, Lev. 1987. Problems of General Psychology: The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 1. Trans. Norris Minick. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Wertsch, James. 1991. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Witte. Stephen. 1992. “Context, Text, Intertext: Toward a Constructivist Semiotic of Writing.” Written Communication 9(2): 237–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Manchón, Rosa M. & Julio Roca de Larios
2023. Chapter 1. The study of L2 writing processes. In Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Spinuzzi, Clay
2023. What Is a Workplace? Principles for Bounding Case Studies of Genres, Processes, Objects, and Organizations. Written Communication 40:4 ► pp. 1027 ff. DOI logo
Walzer, Dorothea
2023. Ubiquitäres Publizieren. Zur Theorie und Geschichte des Selbstveröffentlichens. Journal of Literary Theory 17:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Wargo, Jon M., Melita Morales & Alex Corbitt
2022. Fabricating response: Preservice elementary teachers remediating response to The Circuit through 3D printing and design. Curriculum Inquiry 52:5 ► pp. 544 ff. DOI logo
Atorresi, Ana & Laura Eisner
2021. Escritura e identidad: perspectivas socioculturales. Enunciación 26 ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Manchón, Rosa M.
2021. Chapter 5. The contribution of ethnographically-oriented approaches to the study of L2 writing and text production processes. In Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1], ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.