This study replicates Liszka’s (2009) study of L1 French advanced L2 English speakers who show difficulties in matching meaning-to-form consistently for the present progressive in appropriate contexts, fluctuating between present progressive (‘she is dancing’) and present simple forms (‘she dances’). From these results, Liszka suggests that French L2 learners maintain a strong v[uInfl:], thus allowing English thematic verbs to raise, yielding an event-in-progress interpretation to be associated with the simple form. This study tests this claim, but this time with participants living in the target community. Similar to 2009, results show persistent form-meaning mismatches in progressive contexts in an on-line production task. These results are used to discuss a (permanent) syntactic deficit as the possible source of difficulty. However, the results diverge in an off-line task where performance is markedly better in this study, raising issues on the nature of L2 implicit and explicit knowledge (e.g. Ellis 2005). Furthermore, the line of enquiry is extended to the consideration of potential implications of a syntactic deficit for pragmatic processes from a Relevance Theory perspective (Sperber & Wilson 1986/1995).
2003Core Syntax: A Minimalist approach. Oxford: OUP.
Andersen, R. & Shirai, Y.
1996The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: the pidgin-Creole connection. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds), 527–570. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
2003Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations?Canadian Journal of Linguistics/ Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 48(3-4): 243–263.
2000Persistent selective fossilization in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 34: 75- 90.
2001The theoretical significance of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 17: 345–367.
2005Revisiting wh-movement: the availability of an uninterpretable [wh] feature in interlanguage grammars. In Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), L. Dekdyspotter, R. Sprouse & A. Liljestrand (eds), 124–137. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C.
1997The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: the failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research 13(3) : 187–226.
Hawkins, R., Casillas, G., Hattori, H., Hawthorne, J., Husted, R., Lozano, C., Okamoto, A., Thomas, E. & Yamada, K.
2008The semantic effects of verb raising and its consequences in second language grammars. In The Role of Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 328–351. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
1979Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Syntax and Semantics: Discourse and Syntax, T. Givón (ed.), 213–241. New York NY: Academic Press.
1990As Time Goes By. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2005Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 129–140.
1972Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
1998aCase and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research 14(1): 1–26.
1998bDissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14(4): 359–375.
2000Mapping features to forms in SLA. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, J. Archibald (ed.), 102–129. Oxford: Blackwell.
2004Exploring the effects of first language influence on second language pragmatic processes from a syntactic deficit perspective. Second Language Research 20(3): 212–231.
2000aMissing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16:103–133.
Prévost, P. & White, L.
2000bFiniteness and variability in SLA: more evidence for missing surface inflection. In Proceedings of the 23rdh Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 439–450. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
2019. Accounting for the asymmetrical interpretation of thematic and non-thematic verbs in L2 English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 57:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
SHKURENKO, Anastasiia & Filiz CELE
2022. L2 acquisition of Russian aspect by L1 Turkish speakers. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :31 ► pp. 1561 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.