Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 87–112

Chapter 4. There is no time like the present

A longitudinal case study in the L2 acquisition of French

| University of Arizona
In-depth longitudinal case studies have the tremendous potential of answering the long-standing question of ultimate attainment in second language (L2) acquisition (Hyltenstam & Abrahamsson 2003). However, there are very few such studies, particularly focusing on tense, aspect, mood/modality (TAM) with the notable exception of the longitudinal case study of Patty, a Chinese adult immigrant learner of English (Lardiere 2007). This chapter focuses on the post-puberty L2 acquisition of French in an instructed setting of Billy, an anglophone learner. Qualitative analyses of written data elicited over a three year period will allow us to address the following research questions: (a) can an instructed learner build a native-like TAM system?; (b) where does present indicative and subjunctive alternation fit in the learner’s TAM system?; (c) is the instructed setting of a foreign language classroom sufficient to achieve ultimate attainment (Billy has never been abroad in a French-speaking country)? Findings show that Billy consistently marks tense and contrasts various temporalities, suggesting that his L2 acquisition of French is successful, but with a task effect betraying a not yet complete acquisition of subtle temporal distinctions.
Published online: 9 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.04ayo
References
Abouda, L.
2002 Négation, interrogation et alternance indicatif-subjonctif. French Language Studies 12: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnavielle, T.
2003 Le participe, les formes en -ant: Positions et propositions. Langages 149: 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arteaga-Capen, D. & Herschensohn, J.
2007 Marquage grammatical des syntagmes verbaux et nominaux chez un apprenant avancé. AILE 25: 159–178.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D.
2005 The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (eds), 79–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The Second Language Acquisition of French Tense, Aspect, Mood and Modality [AILA Applied Linguistics Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The acquisition of future temporality by L2 French learners. Journal of French Language Studies 24: 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Rothman, J.
2013 Generative approaches to the L2 acquisition of temporal- aspectual-mood systems. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on Second Language Tense and Aspect, R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 119–156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I.
2005 Je ne pense pas que ce soit vrai – le subjonctif un trait tardif dans l’acquisition du français L2. In Hommage à Jane Nystedt, M. Metzeltin (ed.), 31–49. Wien: Drei Eidechsen.Google Scholar
Bartning, I., Forsberg Lundell, F. & Hancock, V.
2012 On the role of linguistic contextual factors for morphosyntactic stabilization in high-level L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34: 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H.
2005 The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Tense, Vol. 2. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Carvahlo, P.
2003 “Gérondif”, “participe présent” et “adjectif déverbal” en morphosyntaxe comparative. Langages 149: 100–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D.
1999 The Grammar Book. An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course, 2nd edn. Boston MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M.
2005 Investigating the pyschological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: obstacles and possibilities. The Modern Language Journal 89: 367- 380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. & Furnham, A.
2000 Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences 28: 355–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B.
2011 Nativelike right dislocation in near-native French. Second Language Research 27: 361–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2004 Individual differences in second language learning. In The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, A. Davies & C. Elder (eds), 525–551. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J.
1990 Biological dimensions of personality. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and research, L.A. Pervin (ed.), 244–276. New York NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. & Eysenck, S.B.J.
1985 Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach. New York NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. & Wilson, G.
1976 Know Your Own Personality. New York NY: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V. & Lindqvist, C.
2013 Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies 24(2): 1–26.Google Scholar
Grayson, D.
1986 Latent trait analysis of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. Journal of Psychiatry Research 20: 217–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R.
2005 Revisiting wh-movement: The availability of an uninterpretable [wh] feature in interlanguage grammars. In Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), L. Dekydtspotter, D. Sprouse & A. Liljestrand (eds), 124–137. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Liszka, S.
2003 Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In The Interface Between Syntax and Lexicon in Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 30], R. van Hout, H. Aafke, F. Kuiken & R. Towell (eds), 21–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, J.
2007 Language Development and Age. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, J. & Arteaga, D.
2009 Tense and verb raising in advanced L2 French. French Language Studies 19: 291–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, M.
2008 Morpho-syntactic development in the expression of modality: The subjunctive in French L2 acquisition. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée 11: 171–191.Google Scholar
2012 From tense and aspect to modality: The acquisition of future, conditional andsubjunctive morphology in L2 French. A preliminary study. Cahiers Chronos 24: 201–223.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K.
(ed.) 2012 High-level Proficiency in Second Language Use. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N.
2003 Maturational constraints in SLA. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 539–588. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, F.
1986 Semantics of the English Subjunctive. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Jung, C.
1921[1971] Psychological Types. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, M., Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C.
2003 La subordination dans les récits d’apprenants avancés francophones et germanophones de l’anglais. AILE 19: 41–69.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
2007 Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lealess, A.
2005 En français il faut qu’on parle bien: Assessing native-like proficiency in L2 French. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.
Lewis, M.
1986 The English Verb. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.
2000 Revisiting Universal Grammar. Revista de Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada 16: 129–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers Briggs, I., McCaulley, M.H., Naomi Quenk, N. & Hammer, A.
1998 MBTI Handbook: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Mountain View CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y.
1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. LinguisticInquiry 20: 365–424Google Scholar
1997 Langage et cognition. Introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rihs, A.
2012 A defence of the overlap criterion for distinguishing between the French gerund and present participle. Cahiers Chronos 25: 259–275.Google Scholar
Robinson, D., Gabriel, N. & Katchan, O.
1994 Personality and second language learning. Personality and Individual Differences 1: 143–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, P.
2007 Cinque’s functional verbs in French. Language Sciences 29: 755–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R. & Ayoun, D.
2005 The development of L2 tense/aspect in the Romance languages. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, T.
2005 The Eysenck personality questionnaire brief version: Factor structure and reliability. The Journal of Psychology 139: 545–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, U.
2010 The Cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 417–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D.
2005 The critical period hypothesis: A coat of many colors. IRAL 43: 269–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
2011 Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L.
2009 Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. L. & Pinchon, J.
1991 Grammaire du français classique et moderne. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar