Part of
The Acquisition of the Present
Edited by Dalila Ayoun
[Not in series 196] 2015
► pp. 87112
References (50)
References
Abouda, L. 2002. Négation, interrogation et alternance indicatif-subjonctif. French Language Studies 12: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnavielle, T. 2003. Le participe, les formes en -ant: Positions et propositions. Langages 149: 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arteaga-Capen, D. & Herschensohn, J. 2007. Marquage grammatical des syntagmes verbaux et nominaux chez un apprenant avancé. AILE 25: 159–178.Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. 2005. The acquisition of tense and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (eds), 79–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The Second Language Acquisition of French Tense, Aspect, Mood and Modality [AILA Applied Linguistics Series 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The acquisition of future temporality by L2 French learners. Journal of French Language Studies 24: 181–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ayoun, D. & Rothman, J. 2013. Generative approaches to the L2 acquisition of temporal- aspectual-mood systems. In Research Design and Methodology in Studies on Second Language Tense and Aspect, R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (eds), 119–156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartning, I. 2005. Je ne pense pas que ce soit vrai – le subjonctif un trait tardif dans l’acquisition du français L2. In Hommage à Jane Nystedt, M. Metzeltin (ed.), 31–49. Wien: Drei Eidechsen.Google Scholar
Bartning, I., Forsberg Lundell, F. & Hancock, V. 2012. On the role of linguistic contextual factors for morphosyntactic stabilization in high-level L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34: 243–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Tense, Vol. 2. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Carvahlo, P. 2003. “Gérondif”, “participe présent” et “adjectif déverbal” en morphosyntaxe comparative. Langages 149: 100–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. 1999. The Grammar Book. An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course, 2nd edn. Boston MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. 2005. Investigating the pyschological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: obstacles and possibilities. The Modern Language Journal 89: 367- 380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. & Furnham, A. 2000. Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences 28: 355–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B. 2011. Nativelike right dislocation in near-native French. Second Language Research 27: 361–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 2004. Individual differences in second language learning. In The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, A. Davies & C. Elder (eds), 525–551. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. 1990. Biological dimensions of personality. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and research, L.A. Pervin (ed.), 244–276. New York NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. & Eysenck, S.B.J. 1985. Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach. New York NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H.J. & Wilson, G. 1976. Know Your Own Personality. New York NY: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engel, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V. & Lindqvist, C. 2013. Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies 24(2): 1–26.Google Scholar
Grayson, D. 1986. Latent trait analysis of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. Journal of Psychiatry Research 20: 217–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. 2005. Revisiting wh-movement: The availability of an uninterpretable [wh] feature in interlanguage grammars. In Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004), L. Dekydtspotter, D. Sprouse & A. Liljestrand (eds), 124–137. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Liszka, S. 2003. Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers. In The Interface Between Syntax and Lexicon in Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 30], R. van Hout, H. Aafke, F. Kuiken & R. Towell (eds), 21–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, J. 2007. Language Development and Age. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, J. & Arteaga, D. 2009. Tense and verb raising in advanced L2 French. French Language Studies 19: 291–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. 2008. Morpho-syntactic development in the expression of modality: The subjunctive in French L2 acquisition. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée 11: 171–191.Google Scholar
. 2012. From tense and aspect to modality: The acquisition of future, conditional andsubjunctive morphology in L2 French. A preliminary study. Cahiers Chronos 24: 201–223.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (ed.). 2012. High-level Proficiency in Second Language Use. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. 2003. Maturational constraints in SLA. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 539–588. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, F. 1986. Semantics of the English Subjunctive. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Jung, C. 1921[1971]. Psychological Types. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, M., Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. 2003. La subordination dans les récits d’apprenants avancés francophones et germanophones de l’anglais. AILE 19: 41–69.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. 2007. Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lealess, A. 2005. En français il faut qu’on parle bien: Assessing native-like proficiency in L2 French. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.
Lewis, M. 1986. The English Verb. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. 2000. Revisiting Universal Grammar. Revista de Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada 16: 129–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers Briggs, I., McCaulley, M.H., Naomi Quenk, N. & Hammer, A. 1998. MBTI Handbook: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Mountain View CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. LinguisticInquiry 20: 365–424Google Scholar
. 1997. Langage et cognition. Introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Rihs, A. 2012. A defence of the overlap criterion for distinguishing between the French gerund and present participle. Cahiers Chronos 25: 259–275.Google Scholar
Robinson, D., Gabriel, N. & Katchan, O. 1994. Personality and second language learning. Personality and Individual Differences 1: 143–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, P. 2007. Cinque’s functional verbs in French. Language Sciences 29: 755–786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R. & Ayoun, D. 2005. The development of L2 tense/aspect in the Romance languages. In Tense and Aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 29], D. Ayoun & R. Salaberry (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sato, T. 2005. The Eysenck personality questionnaire brief version: Factor structure and reliability. The Journal of Psychology 139: 545–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, U. 2010. The Cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4: 417–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. 2005. The critical period hypothesis: A coat of many colors. IRAL 43: 269–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. L. & Pinchon, J. 1991. Grammaire du français classique et moderne. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ayoun, Dalila
2020. A Longitudinal Study in the L2 Acquisition of the French TAM System. Languages 5:4  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.