Article published in:
Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist: The life histories of some applied linguists
Edited by Rod Ellis
[Not in series 203] 2016
► pp. 89118
References

References

Aston, G.
(1986) Trouble shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bui, X.G.
(2010) Exploring task-internal and task-external readiness: The effects of topic familiarity and strategic planning in topic-based task performance at different proficiency levels. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
(2014) Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning and proficiency levels. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. Processing perspectives on task performance, 63–94).Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M.
(Eds.) Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing London Longman
Bygate, M., Tonkyn, A. & Williams, E.
(1994) Grammar and the language teacher. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Candlin, C.
(1987) Towards task based language learning. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp. 5–22). London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carpenter, H.
(2008) A behavioural and electrophysiological investigation of different aptitudes for L2 grammar in learners equated for proficiency level. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.
(1977) Psychology and language. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch.Google Scholar
Crookes, G.
(1986) Task classification: A cross-disciplinary review (Centre for Second Language Classroom Research: Technical Report No. 6). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
(1989) Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1987) Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 12–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005a) (Ed.). Planning and task performance in a second language (Language Learning & Language Teaching 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005b) Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In Ellis (Ed.) (pp. Planning and task performance in a second language, 3–34). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P.
(1998) A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Ohta, A.S.
(2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer-assistance in secondary language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(1996) The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The effect of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3, 185–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A synthesis of the Ealing research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency investigating complexity, Accuracy and fluency in SLA (Language Learning & Language Teaching 32) (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P. & Skehan, P.
(2013) The effects of post-task activities on the accuracy of language during task performance. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(3), 249–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johns, T.F., & Dudley-Evans, A.
(1979) An experiment in team-teaching of overseas postgraduate students of transportation and plant biology. In E. Smythe (Ed.), Team teaching in ESP (ELTDOCs 106). London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Jupp, T., & Hodlin, S.
(1975) Industrial English. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Li, Qian
(2010) Focus on form in task based language teaching: Exploring the effects of post-task activities and task practice on learners’ oral performance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
(2014) Get it right in the end: The effects of post-task transcribing on learners’ oral performance. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. Processing perspectives on task performance, 129–154).Google Scholar
Long, M., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R.
(1993) Grammar and task based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. (pp. 123–167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Luo, S.
(2007) Re-examining factors that affect task difficulty in task-based language assessment. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Mackey, A.
(1999) Input, interaction, and second language development: An empiricial study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehnert, U.
(1998) The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., Brown, J.D., Hudson, T., & Yoshioka, J.
(1998) Designing second language performance assessments (Technical Report No. 18). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
O’Neill, R., Kingsbury, R., & Yeadon, T.
(1972) Kernel Lessons. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pang, F. & Skehan, P.
(2014) Self-reported planning behaviour and second language performance in narrative retelling. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. Processing perspectives on task performance, 95–128). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1999) Words and rules. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Robertson, F.
(1988) Airspeak – Radiotelephony communication for pilots. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (Task-based Language Teaching 2) (pp. 3–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH.
(1991) Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1980a) Memory, language aptitude, and second language performance. Polyglot, 2(Fiche 3).Google Scholar
(1980b) Language aptitude: A review. English Language Research Journal, 1. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
(1980c) Team teaching and the role of the ESP teacher. In G. Greenall & J.E. Price (Eds.), Study modes and academic development of overseas students. ELTDOCs: The British Council.Google Scholar
(1981) ESP teachers, computers, and research. In J. Higgins (Ed.), Computers in EAP (ELTDOCs). London: The British Council.Google Scholar
(1984) Issues in the testing of English for Specific Purposes. Language Testing, 1(2), 202–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In V. Cook (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1988) Language testing: State of the art review: Part I. Language Teaching, 21(4), 211–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1992) Strategies in second language acquisition (Thames Valley University Working Papers in English Language Teaching, No.1). London: Thames Valley University.Google Scholar
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxord University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Focus on form, tasks, and technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal, 16(5), 391–411 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Task research and language teaching: Reciprocal relationships. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Form-meaning relationships in language pedagogy: Essays in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 55–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009a) Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. In B. Richards, H. Daller, D.D. Malvern, & P. Meara (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. Processing perspectives on task performance, 211–260). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2014) Processing perspectives on task performance (Task-based Language Teaching 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z.
(2011) The task is not enough: Conceptualisation, rehearsal, and monitoring in task based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P., & Ducroquet, L.
(1988) A comparison of first and foreign language learning ability (Working Documents No. 8). London: ESOL Department, Insitute of Education, London University.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
(1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 215–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Task structure and processing conditions in narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Pre-task and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task-based performance in a second Language (Language Learning & Language Teaching 11) (pp. 193– 216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: A meta-analysis of the Ealing research. In S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard & I. Vedder (Eds.). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language use, learning, and teaching. Brussels: University of Brussels Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Henderson, W.
(1979) The team teaching of introductory economics to overseas students. In E. Smyth (Ed.). Team teaching (ELTDOCs) London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Shum, S.
(2014) Structure and processing condition in video-based narrative retelling. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. Processing perspectives on task performance, 187–210). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P.
(2005) Planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language, (pp. 239–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.
(2009) Modelling speech production and performance: Evidence from five types of planning and two task structures. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., & Skehan, P.
(2014) Structure, lexis, and time perspective: Influences on task performance. In Skehan (Ed.) (pp. Processing perspectives on task performance, 155–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z.
.(2009) Effects of working memory capacity on L2 task-based speech planning and performance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Willis J., & Willis, D.
(1988) Collins Cobuild English course. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Willis, D., & Willis, J.
(2007) Doing task based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, A.
(2008) Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar