Article published in:
Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist: The life histories of some applied linguists
Edited by Rod Ellis
[Not in series 203] 2016
► pp. 155174
References

References

Barron, C.
(1991) Material thoughts: ESP and culture. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 173–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazerman, C.
(1988) Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, C., & Paradis, J.
(Eds.) (1991) Textual dynamics of the professions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bizzell, P.
(1992) Academic discourse and critical consciousness (in English). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Blue, G.
(1988) Individualising academic writing tuition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Academic writing: Process and product (ELT Documents 129). London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar
Candlin, C., & Hyland, K.
(Eds.) (1999) Writing: Texts, processes and practices. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Christie, F.
(1987) Genres as choice. In I. Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 22–34). Deakin, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, F., & Martin, J.R.
(Eds.) (1997) Genre in institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Devitt, A.J.
(2004) Writing genres. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Ewer, J.R., & Latorre, G.
(1969) A course in basic scientific English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1988) Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 20–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T., &. Waters, A.
(1987) English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1990) A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21(1), 66–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Hedging in scientific research articles (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000/2004) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman & Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2003) Dissertation acknowledgments: The anatomy of a Cinderella genre. Written Communication, 20(3), 242–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004a) Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005a) Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2005b) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education 16, 363–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The presentation of self in scholarly life: Identity and marginalization in academic homepages. English for Specific Purposes, 30(4), 286–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Bondi, M.
(Eds.) (2006) Academic discourse across disciplines. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(1992) Go for gold: Integrating process & product in ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 11(3), 225–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Milton, J.
(1997) Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 183–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
(2009) “The leading journal in its field”: Evaluation in journal descriptions. Discourse Studies,11(6), 703–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) ‘She has received many honours’: Identity construction in article bio statements. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 155–165 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K.
(1981) The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B.
(1987) Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, S.
(1991) A genre-based approach to the teaching of report writing. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 3–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J.
(1987) Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Mulkay, M.
(1979) Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Munby, J.
(1978) Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, G.
(1991) Lexical cohesion and specialised knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes, 14, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
(2011) Genres across the disciplines. Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raimes, A.
(1991) Instructional balance: From theories to practices in the teaching of writing. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics (pp. 238–249). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, L., Tarone, E., & Hanzeli, V.
(Eds.) (1981) English for academic and technical purposes: Studies in honor of Louis Trimble. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Selinker, L., Todd-Trimble, M., & Trimble, I.
(1976) Presuppositional rhetorical information in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 281–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spack, R.
(1988) Initiating ESL students into the academic discourse community: How far should we go? TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 29–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(ed.) (1985) Episodes in ESP. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E.
(2001) Corpus linguistics at work (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, L.
(1985) English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tse, P., & Hyland, K.
(2006) ‘So what is the problem this book addresses?’ Interactions in book reviews. Text and Talk, 27, 767–790. CrossrefGoogle Scholar