Cover not available
Part of
Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist: The life histories of some applied linguists
Edited by Rod Ellis
[Not in series 203] 2016
► pp. 253–274

The Road Travelled

ORCID logo
Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.203.11gas
References
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S
(1974) Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behney, J., & Gass, S
(2013) Interaction and the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy: A study using syntactic priming. In J. Schwieter (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism (Language Learning & Language Teaching 38) (pp. 43–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M
(1973) Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1974a) Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1974b) You can’t learn without goofing. In J. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 95–123). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(1985) Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V., & Rodman, R
(1988) Introduction to linguistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Ard, J
(1984) L2 acquisition and the ontology of language universals. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Second language acquisition and language universals (Typological Studies in Language 5) (pp. 33–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1980) L2 data: their relevance for language universals. TESOL Quarterly,14, 443–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A
(2002) Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez, M., & Fernández, M
(1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S, & Mackey, A
(2016) Stimulated recall in second language research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S
(1979) Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981) Variability in L2 experimental data. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 85–98.Google Scholar
(1982a) Pragmatic and semantic constraints in Bikol relativization. Linguistics, 19, 1095–1106.Google Scholar
(1982b) From theory to practice. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL ’81 (pp. 129–139). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
(1983) Second language acquisition and language universals. In R. DiPietro, W. Frawley, & A. Wedel (Eds.), The First Delaware Symposium on Language Studies: Selected papers (pp. 249–260). Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
(1984) A review of interlanguage syntax: Language transfer and language universals. Language Learning, 34(2), 115–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Second language acquisition and linguistic theory: The role of language transfer. In S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 384–403). Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Grammar instruction, selective attention and learner processes. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (134–141). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(1993a) English language teaching from a learning perspective. In Explorations and innovations in ELT methodology (pp. 53–77). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
(1993b) Second language acquisition: Past, present and future. Second Language Research, 9(2), 99–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) The reliability of L2 grammaticality judgments. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 303–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1995a) Learning and teaching: The necessary intersection. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 3–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(1995b) Universals, SLA, and language pedagogy. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage. Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 31–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Sentence matching: A reexamination. Second Language Research, 17(4), 421–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Generalizability: What are we generalizing anyway? In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle, & P. Duff (Eds.), Generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple research perspectives (Language Learning & Language Teaching 12) (pp. 209–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Ard, J
(1981) Predicting the distribution of relative clause types in discourse. General Linguistics, 21, 1–10.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A
(2000) Stimulated Recall in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2007) Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2012) Research methodologies in second language acquisition. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2016) Stimulated recall in second language research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2002) Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Madden, D
(Eds.) (1985) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Polio, C
(1997) Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 499–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Schachter, J
(Eds.) (1989) Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (1996) Second language classroom research: Issues and opportunities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L
(1983) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1994) Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L
(2005) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez, M., & Fernandez, M
(1999) The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4): 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, S.G
. (translator) (1968) Veloci e furiosi. Roma: L’Editrice dell’Automobile.Google Scholar
Houck, N., & Gass, S
(1996) Non-native refusals: A methodological perspective. In S. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language (pp. 45–64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Krashen, S
(1977) Some issues relating to the monitor model. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ‘77: Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 144–158). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
(1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackey, A
(1999) Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 567–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S
(2005) Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2016) Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K
(2000) How do learners perceive implicit negative feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega
(2009) Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M
(1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Spinner, P., & Gass, S
in press). Second Language Acquisition and Linguistics: A Bidirectional Perspective. Linguistics Vanguard.
Tarone, E., Gass, S., & Cohen, A
(Eds.) (1994) SResearch methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thomas, M
(2013) The doctorate in second language acquisition: An institutional history. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 509–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Ahn, J
(2015) Testing the Dual Processing Theory in the context of captions: An eye-tracking Study. AAAL, Toronto, Canada. March.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Isbell, D
(2016) TESOL PRESENTATION.Google Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T
(2010) The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65–86.Google Scholar
(2013) Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 254–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar