Cover not available
Part of
Becoming and Being an Applied Linguist: The life histories of some applied linguists
Edited by Rod Ellis
[Not in series 203] 2016
► pp. 253–274

The Road Travelled

ORCID logo
Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.203.11gas
References (60)
References
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24, 235–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behney, J., & Gass, S. (2013). Interaction and the Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy: A study using syntactic priming. In J. Schwieter (Ed.), Innovative research and practices in second language acquisition and bilingualism (Language Learning & Language Teaching 38) (pp. 43–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23, 245–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1974a). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1974b). You can’t learn without goofing. In J. Richards (Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 95–123). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V., & Rodman, R. (1988). Introduction to linguistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Ard, J. (1984). L2 acquisition and the ontology of language universals. In W. Rutherford (Ed.), Second language acquisition and language universals (Typological Studies in Language 5) (pp. 33–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1980). L2 data: their relevance for language universals. TESOL Quarterly,14, 443–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2002). Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez, M., & Fernández, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49, 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S, & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall in second language research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning, 29, 327–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1981). Variability in L2 experimental data. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6 (1), 85–98.Google Scholar
. (1982a). Pragmatic and semantic constraints in Bikol relativization. Linguistics, 19, 1095–1106.Google Scholar
. (1982b). From theory to practice. In M. Hines & W. Rutherford (Eds.), On TESOL ’81 (pp. 129–139). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
. (1983). Second language acquisition and language universals. In R. DiPietro, W. Frawley, & A. Wedel (Eds.), The First Delaware Symposium on Language Studies: Selected papers (pp. 249–260). Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
. (1984). A review of interlanguage syntax: Language transfer and language universals. Language Learning, 34(2), 115–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1988). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory: The role of language transfer. In S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 384–403). Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1991). Grammar instruction, selective attention and learner processes. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch (134–141). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. (1993a). English language teaching from a learning perspective. In Explorations and innovations in ELT methodology (pp. 53–77). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
. (1993b). Second language acquisition: Past, present and future. Second Language Research, 9(2), 99–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). The reliability of L2 grammaticality judgments. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 303–322). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. (1995a). Learning and teaching: The necessary intersection. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham & R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 3–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. (1995b). Universals, SLA, and language pedagogy. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage. Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp. 31–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2001). Sentence matching: A reexamination. Second Language Research, 17(4), 421–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Generalizability: What are we generalizing anyway? In M. Chalhoub-Deville, C. Chapelle, & P. Duff (Eds.), Generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple research perspectives (Language Learning & Language Teaching 12) (pp. 209–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Ard, J. (1981). Predicting the distribution of relative clause types in discourse. General Linguistics, 21, 1–10.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated Recall in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. (2007). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. (2012). Research methodologies in second language acquisition. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. (2016). Stimulated recall in second language research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (2002). Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 249–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Madden, D. (Eds.), (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Polio, C. (1997). Replication and reporting: A commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4), 499–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Schachter, J. (Eds.). (1989). Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (Eds.). (1996). Second language classroom research: Issues and opportunities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (1983). Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., Alvarez, M., & Fernandez, M. (1999). The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning, 49(4): 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giuliani, S.G. (translator) (1968). Veloci e furiosi. Roma: L’Editrice dell’Automobile.Google Scholar
Houck, N., & Gass, S. (1996). Non-native refusals: A methodological perspective. In S. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication in a second language (pp. 45–64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1977). Some issues relating to the monitor model. In H. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL ‘77: Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 144–158). Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 567–587. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive implicit negative feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Spinner, P., & Gass, S. (in press). Second Language Acquisition and Linguistics: A Bidirectional Perspective. Linguistics Vanguard.
Tarone, E., Gass, S., & Cohen, A. (Eds.). (1994). SResearch methodology in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (2013). The doctorate in second language acquisition: An institutional history. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 509–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Ahn, J. (2015). Testing the Dual Processing Theory in the context of captions: An eye-tracking Study. AAAL, Toronto, Canada. March.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Isbell, D. (2016). TESOL PRESENTATION.Google Scholar
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65–86.Google Scholar
. (2013). Factors influencing the use of captions by foreign language learners: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 254–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar