Cover not available
Part of
Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by Eliane Segers and Paul van den Broek
[Not in series 206] 2017
► pp. 237–255

Development of qualifiers in children’s written stories

| | Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
|
In general, stories written by children in which many details are used are perceived as being more attractive. However, the use of stylistic elements in children’s writings has scarcely been described. We investigated stories written by 320 elementary school children from grades 3 to 6, focusing on the qualifiers they used to describe persons, objects and actions: names, relationships, intensifiers, adjectives and adverbs, sizes, prices, colors, details, and words to express modality, place and directions. The results showed a significant growth from grade 3 to 6 in the number of qualifiers. Dutch-L1 outperformed Dutch-L2 children in almost all these qualifiers. Girls used significantly more names, intensifiers, adjectives and adverbs in their description of persons, objects and actions than boys.
Keywords: qualifiers, stylistic development, written stories, children, elementary school, lexical variation, writing skills, gender differences in language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Informants
    • 2.2Instrumentation
    • 2.3Analyses and coding of qualifiers in the texts of the Writing Cohesion Task
    • 2.4Word Definition Task (25 items)
    • 2.5Procedure
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Tokens and types
    • 3.2Qualifiers
    • 3.3Name
    • 3.4Relation
    • 3.5Intensifiers
    • 3.6Adjective/adverb
    • 3.7Size
    • 3.8Price
    • 3.9Color
    • 3.10Detail
    • 3.11Modality/place/direction
    • 3.12Word Definition Task
    • 3.13Relation between the use of qualifiers and vocabulary
  • 4.Conclusions and discussion
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 21 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.15ver
References (26)
References
Cito. (2004). Balans van het schrijfonderwijs op de basisschool [Balance of teaching writing skills in elementary school]. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar
Gein, J. van de (2004). Balans van taalkwaliteit in schrijfwerk uit het primaire onderwijs [Balance of the qualities of writing skills in elementary school]. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar
Heesters, K. (2000). Een wereld vol verhalen. Ontwikkeling van verhaalstructuur bij 9- tot 13-jarige eerste- en tweedetaalsprekers van het Nederlands [A world full of stories. Development in story structure in 9 to 13 year old speakers of Dutch L1 and Dutch L2]. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
Heilmann, J., Miller, J. F., Nockerts, A., & Dunaway, C. (2010). Properties of the narrative scoring scheme using narrative retells in young school-age children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 154–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ketelaars, M. P., Jansonius, K., Cuperus, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Narrative competence and underlying mechanisms in children with pragmatic language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 281–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhlemeier, H., Van Til, A., Feenstra, H., & Hemker, B. (2013). Balans van de schrijfvaardigheid in het basis- en speciaal basisonderwijs 2 [Balance of the writing skills in elementary and special education]. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar
Kulkofsky, S., & Klemfuss, J. Z. (2008). What the stories children tell can tell about their memory: narrative skill and young children’s suggestibility. Development Psychology, 44 (5), 1442–1456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Available at [URL].Google Scholar
Miller. J., Iglesias, A., Heilmann, J., Fabiano, L., Nockerts, A., & Francis, D. (2006). Oral language and reading in bilingual children. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(1), 30–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulken, M. van, & Schellens, P. J. (2012). Over loodzware bassen en wapperende broekspijpen: Gebruik en perceptie van taalintensiverende stijlmiddelen [About heavy basses and flying trouser-legs: Use and perception of stylistic intensifiers]. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34(1), 26–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, M. L., Gillam, R. B., Peña, E. D., & Gully-Faehnle, A. (2003). Measures of language development in fictional narratives of Latino children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 332–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. (2009). Young minds in a social world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, H. van. (1994). Sekseverschillen in taalproductie bij jongens en meisjes [Gender differences in language production of boys and girls]. Tilburg: Master thesis Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z. (2002). Narrative competence among monolingual and bilingual school children in Miami. In D. K. Oller & R. E. Eilers (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 135–174). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Roth, F., Speece, D. L., Cooper, D. H., & De la Paz, S. (1996). Unresolved mysteries: How do metalinguistic and narrative skills connect with early reading? The Journal of Special Education, 30(3), 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., & Spooren, W. (2009). The cognition of discourse coherence. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse of course (pp. 197–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, S., & Shaffer, D. (2000). Vividness can undermine or enhance message processing: The moderating role of vividness congruency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(7), 769–779. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uccelli, P., & Páez, M. M. (2007). Narrative and vocabulary development of bilingual children from kindergarten to first grade: Developmental changes and associations among English and Spanish skills. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38(3), 225–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L., & Vermeer, A. (1993). Taaltoets Allochtone Kinderen Bovenbouw [Language proficiency test for elementary school children in grades 4 to 6]. Tilburg: Zwijsen.Google Scholar
. (1996). Taalvaardigheid in de bovenbouw [Language proficiency in the higher grades of elementary school]. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
. (2001). Taaltoets Alle Kinderen. Diagnostische toets voor de mondelinge vaardigheid Nederlands bij kinderen van groep 1 tot en met 4 [Language test for all children: Diagnostic test for oral proficiency in Dutch for children from Kindergarten to grade 2]. Arnhem: Cito.Google Scholar
Vermeer, A. (2016). Acquisition order of connectives in stories of Dutch L1 and L2 children from 4 to 8. In J. Evers-Vermeul, L. Rasier, & E. Tribushinina (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and language teaching (pp. 191–206. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Vermeer, A., & Assem, G. van den (2012). Ontwikkeling van schrijfvaardigheid in groep 5 tot en met 8 [Development in writing skills in grade 3 to grade 6]. In N. de Jong, K. Juffermans, M. Keijzer, & L. Rasier (Eds.), Artikelen van de zevende Anéla-conferentie [Papers of the 7th Anéla conference] (pp. 86–95). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Zandbergen, E. (1994). Betekenisrelaties in teksten van kinderen [Coherence relations in children’s writings]. Tilburg: Master thesis Tilburg University.Google Scholar