Cover not available
Part of
Developmental Perspectives in Written Language and Literacy: In honor of Ludo Verhoeven
Edited by Eliane Segers and Paul van den Broek
[Not in series 206] 2017
► pp. 257–273

Individual variation in syntactic processing in the second language

Electrophysiological approaches

| | Department of Psychology and Center for Language Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA
|
This chapter reviews research on how individual differences in linguistic and cognitive abilities influence syntactic processing in the second language (L2). We briefly discuss individual variability in L2 syntactic processing through the lens of behavioral measurements, followed by a more extensive review of electrophysiological (i.e., Event-Related Potentials, ERP) studies on L2 syntactic processing. Relative to the behavioral literature, fewer ERP studies have examined individual variability in L2 syntactic processing and the large majority of these studies focused on only two factors: Age of Acquisition and L2 proficiency. We also discuss studies that used correlational and regression analyses and oscillatory neural dynamics and complex network analysis. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of studies that examined inter-individual variation in ERP response profiles associated with L2 and L1 syntactic processing in L2 learners, and the application of the Response-Dominance Index to quantify individual variability in ERP response profiles.
Keywords: second language processing, syntactic processing, individual differences, electrophysiology, event-related potentials, neurocognition, psycholinguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Individual differences in second language syntactic processing: Electrophysiological studies
    • 1.1EEG and ERP methodology
    • 1.2Age of acquisition
    • 1.3L2 proficiency
    • 1.4Studies comparing different L2 learner groups who vary on L2 proficiency
    • 1.5Longitudinal studies of L2 learners who develop L2 proficiency over time
    • 1.6Learning of artificial languages to track changes in proficiency within short timeframe
  • 2.Advanced EEG/ERP analyses to study individual differences in syntactic processing
    • 2.1Correlational and regression analyses
    • 2.2Oscillatory neural dynamics and complex network analysis
    • 2.3Inter-individual variation in electrophysiological response profiles
  • 3.Conclusions
  • Authors’ note
  • References
Published online: 21 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.206.16van
References (62)
References
Abdollahi, F., & Van Hell, J. G. (2016). Neurocognitive correlates of syntactic processing in child and adult second language learners. Poster presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Society for Cognitive Neuroscience. New York, April 2–5.Google Scholar
Allen, H. W. (2010). Language-learning motivation during short-term study abroad: An activity theory perspective. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 27–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, I., Takashima, A., Van Hell, J. G., Janzen, G., & McQueen, J. M. (2015). Changes in theta and beta oscillations as signatures of novel word consolidation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 1286–1297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bastiaansen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). Oscillatory neuronal dynamics during language comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 179–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2015). Frequency-based segregation of syntactic and semantic unification during online sentence level language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 2095–2107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batterink, L., & Neville, H. J. (2013). Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 936–951. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 9–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowden, H. W., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 13, 2492–2511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffarra, S., Molinaro, N., Davidson, D., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 31–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, E. (2012). Difference speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 219–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D., & Indefrey, P. (2009). An event-related potential study on changes of violation and error responses during morphosyntactic learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 433–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. (2005). Investigating the social and emotional dimensions of instructed language learning: obstacles and possibilities. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 367–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diaz, B., Erdocia, K., de Menezes, R. F., Mueller, J. L., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Laka, I. (2016). Electrophysiological correlates of second-language syntactic processes are related to native and second language distance regardless of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 133.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Individual differences in sentence processing. In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 353–364). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 78–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. PNAS, 99, 529–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabner, R. H., Brunner, C., Leep, R., Neuper, C., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2007). Event-related EEG beta and alpha band oscillatory responses during language translation. Brain Research Bulletin, 72, 57–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grey, S. E., Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2017). How right is left? Handedness modulates neural responses during morphosyntactic processing. Brain Research, 1669, 27–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Williams, J. J., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual differences in incidental language learning: Phonological working memory, learning styles, and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, J., Guo, T., Yan, Y., Jiang, N., & Peng, D. (2009). ERP evidence for different strategies employed by native speakers and L2 learners in sentence processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A. (2001). What’s different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 193–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2015). Individual differences in the second language processing of object-subject ambiguities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 129–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. W. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 42, 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holbcomb, P. J. (2000). The P600 as an index of integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapa, L. L., & Colombo, J. (2014). Executive function predicts artificial language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 237–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kielar, A., Meltzer, J. A., Moreno, S., Alain, C., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Oscillatory responses to semantic and syntactic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2840–2862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolk, H., & Chwilla, D. (2007). Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language, 100, 257–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Litcofsky, K. A. & Van Hell, J. G. (2017). Switching direction affects switching costs: Behavioral, ERP, and time-frequency analyses of intra-sentential codeswitching. Neuropsychologia, 97, 112–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., & Osterhout, L. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60, 123–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meulman, N., Wieling, M., Sprenger, S. A., Stowe, L. A., & Schmid, M. S. (2015). Age effects in L2 grammar processing as revealed by ERPs and how (not) to study them. PLOS One, 10(12), e0143328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molinaro, N., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 30, 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K. (2014). Electrophysiological approaches to understanding second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 15–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potentials study. Language Learning, 60, 154–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 933–947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. L., Hahne, A., Fujii, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and nonnative speakers’ processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1229–1244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005). An ERPs study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1212–1228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 785–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, M., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., & Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second-language processing. Language Learning, 56, 199–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2752–2765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez, A., Gillon Dowens, M., Molinaro, N., Iturria-Medina, Y., Barraza, P., García-Pentón, L., & Carreiras, M. (2015) Complex brain network properties in late L2 learners and native speakers. Neuropsychologia, 68, 209–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. (2012). Individual differences in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 62, 172–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 45–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, S., Gugler, M. F., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2030–2048. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinhauer, K., White, E. J., & Drury, J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25, 13–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 367–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (2014). Brain-based individual differences in on-line L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 277–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in syntactic processing mechanisms. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Newman, A. J. (2014). Modeling nonlinear relationships in ERP data using mixed-effects regression with R examples. Psychophysiology, 52, 124–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Tanner, D. (2012). Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation. Language Learning, 62,148–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26, 43–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constrains on functional specializations for language processing: ERPs and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, S., & Mueller, H. M. (2012). “Too many betas do not spoil the broth”: The role of beta brain oscillations in language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(201), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, E. J., Genesee, F., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: Proficiency based changes and first language background effects in adult learners. PLOS One, 7(12), e52318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Wicha, Nicole Y. Y., Eva María Moreno & Haydée Carrasco‐Ortíz
2019. Real‐Time Measures of the Multilingual Brain. In The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism, ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Birdsong, David
2018. Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.