Cover not available
Part of
Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 77–92

Chapter 5
Adposition clusters in Dutch

| University of Leuven

This paper demonstrates that Dutch not only has verb clusters, but also adposition clusters. It identifies the adpositions that participate in clustering and provides quantitative data about their use in corpora of spoken Dutch and written Dutch.

Keywords: adposition, cluster, Dutch, circumposition, stranding, string search, regular expression.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Adposition clustering exists
    • 2.1A first attempt
    • 2.2A second attempt
  • 3.Identifying the clustering adpositions
    • 3.1Retrieval
    • 3.2Filtering
    • 3.3An objection and its rebuttal
  • 4.Properties of the Dutch adposition clusters
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.210.05van
References
Broekhuis, Hans
2013 Syntax of Dutch. Adpositions and Adpositional Phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970 Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar
1973 Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Cremers, Crit
2004 Modal merge and minimal move for dislocation and verb clustering. Journal of Language and Computation 2. 87–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haeseryn, W., K. Romijn, G. Geerts, J. de Rooij & M. C. van den Toorn
1997 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Tweede druk. Groningen: M. Nijhoff & Deurne: Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1973 The base rules for prepositional phrases, In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 345–356. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Wim Goedertier, Frank Van Eynde, Louis Boves, Jean-Pierre Martens, Michael Moortgat & Harald Baayen
2002 Experiences from the Spoken Dutch Corpus Project, In M. Gonzalez Rodriguez & C. P. Saurez Araujo (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 340–347. Paris: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Smessaert, Hans, William Van Belle & Ingrid Van Canegem-Ardijns
2014 Adpositional constructions of location and motion in Dutch. In Nicole Delbecque, Karen Lahousse & Willy Van Langendonck (eds.), Non-nuclear cases. 127–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Van Eynde, Frank & Liesbeth Augustinus
2014 Complement raising, extraction and adposition stranding in Dutch. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 156–175. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Van Noord, Gertjan, Gosse Bouma, Frank Van Eynde, Daniël de Kok, Jelmer van der Linde, Ineke Schuurman, Erik Tjong Kim Sang & Vincent Vandeghinste
2013 Large Scale Syntactic Annotation of Written Dutch: Lassy. In Peter Spyns & Jan Odijk (eds.), Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch, 147–164. Berlin: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, Henk
1978 A case study in syntactic markedness. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Van Eynde, Frank
2019. Clustering and stranding in Dutch. Linguistics 57:5 ► pp. 1025 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.