Chapter published in:
Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 93106
Atlas, Jay D.
2005Logic, meaning, and conversation. Semantical undeterminacy, implicature and their interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1996Directionality and logical form. On the scope of focusing particles and wh-in-situ. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2004Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 39–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013Logic in grammar. Polarity, free choice and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen
2012The emergence of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cremers, Crit
1993On parsing coordination categorially. Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1988Type raising, functional composition, and nonconstituent conjunction. In Emmon Bach, Richard T. Oehrle & Deirdre Wheeler (eds.), Categorial grammars and natural language structures, 153–197. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1975Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6(3), 353–375.Google Scholar
Fintel, Kai von
1999 NPI licensing, Strawson entailment, and context dependency. Journal of semantics 16(2). 97–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1981Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 155–184.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart
2007Existential import. In Ileana Comorovski and Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: semantics and syntax, 253–271. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2010Quantity implicatures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: variation, licensing, and compositionality. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John
1985A principled exception to the coordinate structure constraint. In William H. Eilfort, Paul D. Kroeber & Karen L. Peterson (eds.), CLS 21, Part 1: Papers from the general session, 133–143. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Goro, Takuya & Sachie Akiba
2004The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. In G. Garding and M. Tsujimura, Proceedings of WCCFL 23, 101–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Guerzoni, Elena
2006Intervention effects on NPIs and feature movement: towards a unified account of intervention. Natural Language Semantics 14(4). 359–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrom, Paul
2008Intervention and NPIs (Guerzoni 2006). Unpublished manuscript, Boston University.Google Scholar
Haslinger, Irene & Marjo van Koppen
2002–3De verbale hendiadys als pseudocoördinatie. Taal en Tongval 15–16. 102–122.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
1988The semantics of non-Boolean and. Journal of Semantics 6(1). 19–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Dutch ENIG: From nonveridicality to downward entailment. Natural language & linguistic theory 28(4). 837–859. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack & Hotze Rullmann
2001Scalarity and polarity. In Jack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann Victor Sanchez-Valencia and Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items, 129–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jong, Franciska de & Henk Verkuyl
1985Generalized quantifiers: the properness of their strength. In Johan van Benthem & Alice ter Meulen, (eds.) Generalized quantifiers in natural language, 21–43. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman
1993Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4). 353–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koppen, Marjo van & Crit Cremers
2008Boolean agreement in Tegelen Dutch. Lingua 118. 1064–1079. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1995The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25(3–4). 209–257.Google Scholar
Kürschner, Wilfried
1983Studien zur negation im Deutschen. Gunter Narr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A.
1980Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. University of Texas at Austin dissertation.Google Scholar
Linebarger, Marcia
1980The grammar of negative polarity. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Linebarger, Marcia C.
1987Negative polarity and grammatical representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 10(3). 325–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana
1994Negative and positive polarity: A binding approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Russell, Benjamin
2006Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics 23(4). 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Valencia, Victor
1991Studies on natural logic and categorial grammar. University of Amsterdam dissertation.Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli
2012The computation of scalar implicatures: Pragmatic, lexical or grammatical? Language and Linguistics Compass 6(1). 36–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmerling, Susan F.
1975Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech Acts, 211–232. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spector, Benjamin
2014Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(11). 1–61.Google Scholar
Steedman, Mark J.
1985Dependency and coördination in the grammar of Dutch and English. Language 61(3). 523–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2004Positive polarity–negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22. 409–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna & Frans Zwarts
1991Unbounded dependencies and algebraic semantics. Lecture notes for the 3rd European Summer School in Language, Logic and Information, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
1993Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. Natural Language Semantics 1(3). 235–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna & Bill Haddican
2004Conjunction meets negation: A atudy in cross‐linguistic variation. Journal of Semantics 21(3). 219–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandeweghe, Willy
1980Ook maar X. Studia Germanica Gandensia 21. 15–56.Google Scholar
Wouden, Ton van der
1994Negative contexts. University of Groningen dissertation.Google Scholar
1997Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans
1986aCategoriale grammatica en algebraïsche semantiek. Een onderzoek naar negatie en polariteit in het Nederlands. University of Groningen dissertation.Google Scholar
1986bPolariteit: De reikwijdte van een lexicale eigenschap. In Cor Hoppenbrouwers, Ineke Schuurman, Ron van Zonneveld & Frans Zwarts (eds.), Syntaxis en lexicon, 157–192. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar