Chapter published in:
Crossroads Semantics: Computation, experiment and grammar
Edited by Hilke Reckman, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, Maarten Hijzelendoorn and Rint Sybesma
[Not in series 210] 2017
► pp. 249261
References

References

As, Saskia van
1992Doubletten en het Humboldtiaans principe: Het geval nu/nou. Forum der Letteren 33. 284–301.Google Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der
1984From temporal adverb to modal particle – some comparative remarks on Polish “czasem” (“sometimes”). Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics 18. 91–99.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny & Kim Verheij
2013Als dát geen insubordinatie is! De pragmatiek van zelfstandige conditionele zinnen. In Theo Janssen & Jan Noordegraaf (eds.), Honderd jaar taalwetenschap. Artikelen aangeboden aan Saskia Daalder bij haar afscheid van de Vrije Universiteit, 13–28. Amsterdam, St. Neerlandistiek VU & Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar
Cremers, Crit
2016Algebras of our mind, windmills of language: the wenn/ob/oder-complex. Paper presented at LUSH, Leiden University, May 2016.
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foolen, Ad
2003Niederländisch toch und Deutsch doch: Gleich oder doch nicht ganz? Linguistik online 13(1).Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2012On the grammar of optative constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guerzoni, Elena & Yael Sharvit
2014‘Whether or not anything’ but not ‘whether anything or not’. In Luka Crnič and Uli Sauerland (eds.), The art and craft of semantics: A festschrift for Irene Heim. Vol. 1, 199–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn
1997Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. 2nd ed. Groningen: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1972On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman
1993Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4). 353–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kirsner, Robert & Jeanine Deen
1990Het mes snijdt aan twee kanten. On the semantics and pragmatics of the Dutch final particle hoor . In Margriet Bruijn Lacy (ed.), The Low Countries: Multidisciplinary studies, 1–12. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Paardekooper, P. C.
1971Beknopte ABN-syntaksis. 4th ed. ’s-Hertogenbosch: Malmberg.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2003Between epistemic modality and degree: the case of really . In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer & Manfred Krug (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 191–221. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renkema, Jan, et al.
2016Taal is taal. De interactieve ‘basta’-functie van een schijnbare tautologie. Neder-L 2016 http://​www​.janrenkema​.nl​/file​/artikel​/taal​_is​_taal​.pdf.
Snel, Barbara
Vismans, Roel
1994Modal particles in Dutch directives: A study in functional grammar. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam dissertation.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Jan Beavin Bavelas & Don D. Jackson
1967Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Wouden, Ton van der
2015A marked construction to mark a marked phenomenon: how to shift topics in Dutch, or, the Barabbas construction. In Sander Lestrade, Peter de Swart & Lotte Hogeweg (eds.), Addenda: artikelen voor Ad Foolen, 539–572. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. http://​repository​.ubn​.ru​.nl​/bitstream​/handle​/2066​/141617​/141617​.pdf​?sequence​=1
Zwarts, Frans
1995Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25(3–4). 286–312.Google Scholar