Cover not available
Part of
Creole Studies – Phylogenetic Approaches
Edited by Peter Bakker, Finn Borchsenius, Carsten Levisen and Eeva M. Sippola
[Not in series 211] 2017
► pp. 369–373

Chapter 16
Feature pools show that creoles are distinct languages due to their special origin

| Aarhus University
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 31 May 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.211.16bak
References (11)
References
Bakker, P. 2014a. Creolistics: Back to square one? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(1): 177–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. Creoles and typology: Problems of sampling and definition. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29(2): 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, P., Daval-Markussen, A., Parkvall, M. & Plag. I. 2013. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. In Creole Languages and Linguistic Typology [Benjamins Current Topics 57], P. Bhatt & T. Veenstra (eds), 9–45. Appeared originally in 2011. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, M. 2009. APiCS, WALS, and the creole typological profile (if any). Paper presented at the 1st APiCS conference, Leipzig, 5–8 November.Google Scholar
Daval-Markussen, A. 2013. First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 45(2): 274–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In print. Creole typology in the age of APiCS. Journal of Language Contact.
Holm, J. & Patrick P. L. (eds). 2007. Comparative Creole Syntax. Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. 1998. Identifying the creole prototype. Vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. C. 2015. Conclusion: feature distribution in the West Africa-Surinam Trans-Atlantic Sprachbund. In Surviving the Middle Passage. The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, P. C. Muysken, N. Smith, in collaboration with R. D. Borges (eds), 393–408. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, M. 2008. The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Language Complexity. Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion series 94]. M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (eds), 265–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B. 2009. The morphosyntax of varieties of English worldwide: A quantitative perspective. Lingua 119: 1643–1663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bakker, Peter
2017. Reply to Enoch Aboh’s rejoinder to my article on his book ‘The emergence of hybrid grammars’. <i>WORD</i> 63:3 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Bakker, Peter
2019. Nominal Contact in Michif. By Carrie Gillon, Nicole Rosen, with Verna Demontigny. (Oxford Studies of Endangered Languages). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. xxi + 202. US$85.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9780198795339.. International Journal of American Linguistics 85:1 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.