Chapter published in:
Language Dispersal Beyond Farming
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev
[Not in series 215] 2017
► pp. 183–214

The domestications and the domesticators of Asian rice

| Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Rice genetics has now provided molecular evidence for three distinct domestications of Asian rice, giving rise to ahu, indica and japonica rice and subsequently involving the multidirectional introgression of favoured alleles between these three families of Oryza sativa cultivars. The phylogeography of Asian wild and cultivated rice species also permits inferences with regard to the likely geographical range within which these three domestication processes involving Asian cultivated rice unfolded. Evidence from linguistic palaeontology permits the identification of two language families whose linguistic ancestors pose the likeliest candidates for the earliest rice domesticators, Austroasiatic and Hmong-Mien. The linguistic arguments and population genetic evidence on Asian rice are assessed. Recent advances in palaeobotany as well as a number of currently prevalent misunderstandings in rice archaeology are discussed. Another set of evidence from linguistic palaeontology involving reconstructible etyma denoting megafauna in light of the early Holocene distribution of these megafaunal species provides a geographical indication for the location of the early Austroasiatic homeland. Furthermore, the molecular genetics of human populations are discussed in order to shed light on the prehistory and geography of the Austroasiatic, Hmong-Mien and other language families. Finally, a synthesis of the disparate sets of evidence is presented.
Keywords: rice (Oryza sativa), Hmong-Mien, Austroasiatic, phylogeography, preservation bias
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 21 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.08van
References

References

Abdulla, Mahmood Ameen et al.
2009 Mapping human genetic diversity in Asia. Science 326: 1541–1545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, Dharma P.
2002 The earliest pottery and agriculture in South Asia. In The Origins of Pottery and Agriculture, Yoshinori Yasuda (ed.), 81–88. New Delhi: Lusre Press and Roli Books, for the International Center for Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade
2011 Millets, rice, social complexity and the spread of agriculture to the Chengdu plain and southwest China. Rice 4(3): 104–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Rethinking the spread of agriculture to the Tibetan plateau. Holocene 25(9): 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
d’Alpoim Guedes, Jade et al.
2013 Site of Baodun yields earliest evidence for the spread of rice and foxtail millet agriculture to south-west China. Antiquity 87: 758–771. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Moving agriculture onto the Tibetan plateau: the archaeobotanical evidence. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6(3): 255–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William Hubbard & Sagart, Laurent
2014a Baxter-Sagart Old Chinese reconstruction, version 1.1. http://​ocbaxtersagart​.lsait​.lsa​.umich​.edu> (20 September 2014). Crossref
2014b Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul King
1942 Thai, Kadai, and Indonesia: A new alignment in southeastern Asia. American Anthropologist 44: 576–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1972 Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blench, Roger Marsh
2009 If agriculture cannot be reconstructed for Proto-Sino-Tibetan, what are the consequences? Paper presented at the 42nd Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics at Chiang Mai, 3 November.
Blust, Robert
1996 Beyond the Austronesian homeland: The Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology. In Prehistoric Settlement of the Pacific, Ward H. Goodenough (ed.), 117–160. Philadelphia PA: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Cai Xiaoyun et al.
2011 Human migration through bottlenecks from Southeast Asia into East Asia during Last Glacial Maxiumum revealed by Y chromosomes. Public Library of Science 6(8): e24282.Google Scholar
de Candolle, Alphonse-Louis-Pierre Pyrame
1883 Origine des plantes cultivées. Paris: Librairie Germer Ballière et Compagnie.Google Scholar
Castillo, Cristina Cobo et al.
2016 Archaeogenetic study of prehistoric rice remains from Thailand and India: evidence of early japonica in South and Southeast Asia. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 8(3): 523–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca, Menozzi, Paolo & Piazza, Alberto
1994 The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chaubey, Gyaneshwer et al.
2010 Population genetic structure in Indian Austroasiatic speakers: The role of landscape barriers and sex-specific admixture. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(2): 1013–1024. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jiongjiong et al.
2008 A triallelic system of S5 is a major regulator of the reproductive barrier and compatibility of indica-japonica hybrids in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(32): 11436–11441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Fahu et al.
2015 Agriculture facilitated permanent human occupation of the Tibetan Plateau after 3600 B.P. Science 347 (6219): 248–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jae Young et al.
2017 The rice paradox: Multiple origins but single domestication in asian rice. Molecular Biology and Evolution Crossref. Crossref
Civáň, Peter, Craig, Hayley, Cox, Cymon J. & Brown, Terence A.
2015 Three geographically separate domestications of Asian rice. Nature Plants, 1, article No. 15164 <Crossref>. See van Driem (2011: 131–132) for additional references on rice and the population genetics of rice.Google Scholar
Crawford, Gary W. & Shen, Chen
1998 The origins of rice agriculture: Recent progress in East Asia. Antiquity 72: 858–866. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, Richard D.
1970 Rebel Haunts and Lotus Huts: Problems in the Ethnohistory of the Yao. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Derenko, Miroslava et al.
2007 Y-chromosome haplogroup N dispersal from south Siberia to Europe. Journal of Human Genetics 52: 763–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard
2005 The contribution of linguistic palaeontology to the homeland of Austroasiatic. In The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together the Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds), 77–80. London: Routledge Curzon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The four registers of Pearic. Paper presented at the 22nd Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society , Agay, 2 June 2012.
van Driem, George
2001 Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, containing an Introduction to the Symbiotic Theory of Language, 2 Vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2005 Tibeto-Burman vs. Indo-Chinese: Implications for population geneticists, archaeologists and prehistorians. In The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together the Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds), 81–106. London: Routledge Curzon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 The diversity of the Tibeto-Burman language family and the linguistic ancestry of Chinese. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 1(2): 211–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Rice and the Austroasiatic and Hmong-Mien homelands. In Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, Nick J. Enfield (ed.), 361–389. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
2012 The ethnolinguistic identity of the domesticators of Asian rice. Comptes Rendus Palévol 11(2): 117–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014a Trans-Himalayan. In Trans-Himalayan Linguistics, Nathan Hill & Thomas Owen-Smith (eds), 11–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014b A prehistoric thoroughfare between the Ganges and the Himalayas. In 50 Years after Daojali-Hading: Emerging Perspectives in the Archaeology of Northeast India, Tiatoshi Jamir & Manjil Hazarika (eds), 60–98. New Delhi: Research India Press.Google Scholar
2015a Health in the Himalayas and the Himalayan homelands. In Tibetan and Himalayan Healing, Charles Ramble & Ulrike Roesler (eds), 161–194. Kathmandu: Vajra Publications.Google Scholar
2015b The Himalayas as a prehistoric corridor for the peopling of East and Southeast Asia. In Nepal: An Introduction to the Natural History, Ecology and Human Environment in the Himalayas, Georg Miehe & Colin Pendry (eds), 318–325. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh.Google Scholar
2017 The epistemological event horizon in archaeology. In Prehistory and Archaeology of Northeast India, Manjil Hazarika (ed.), xv–xvii. New Delhi: OUP.Google Scholar
Forrest, Robert Andrew Dermod
1948 The Chinese Language. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q., Harvey, Emma & Qin, Ling
2007 Presumed domestication? Evidence for wild rice cultivation and domestication in the fifth millennium BC of the Lower Yangtze region. Antiquity 81: 316–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q. & Qin, Ling
2009 Water management and labour in the origins and dispersal of Asian rice. World Archaeology 41 (1): 88–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q. et al.
2009 The domestication process and domestication rate in rice: Spikelet bases from the Lower Yangtze. Science 323: 1607–1610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q. & Qin, Ling
2010 Declining oaks, increasing artistry, and cultivating rice: The environmental and social context of the emergence of farming in the Lower Yangtze Region. Environmental Archaeology 15 (2): 139–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q. et al.
2010 Consilience of genetics and archaeobotany in the entangled history of rice. Archaeological and Anthropologiocal Sciences 2(2): 115–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q.
2012 Pathways to Asian civilizations: Tracing the origins and spread of rice and rice cultures. Rice 4 (3–4): 78–92.Google Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q., Weisskopf, Alison R. & Castillo, Cristina Cobo
2016 Pathways of rice diversification across Asia. Archaeology International 19: 84–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garris, Amanda J., Tai, Thomas H., Coburn, Jason, Kresovich, Steve & McCouch, Susan
2005 Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L. Genetics 169: 1631–1638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackinger, Sophie et al.
2016 Wide distribution and altitude correlation of an archaic high-altitude adaptive EPAS1 haplotype in the Himalayas. Human Genetics 135 (4): 393–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hazarika, Manjil
2005 Neolithic Culture of Northeast India with Special Reference to the Origins of Agriculture and Pottery. MA thesis, Deccan College, Pune.Google Scholar
2006 Neolithic culture of northeast India: A recent perspective on the origins of pottery and agriculture. Ancient Asia 1: 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Prehistoric cultural affinities between Southeast Asia, East Asia and Northeast India: An exploration. In Unearthing Southeast Asia’s Past, Vol. 1, Marijke J. Klokke & Véronique Degroot (eds), 16–25. Singapore: National University.Google Scholar
2014 Austroasiatic and Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Dispersals in Northeast India: An Archaeological Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Bern.Google Scholar
2017 Prehistory and Archaeology of Northeast India. New Delhi: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Heine-Geldern, Robert
1917 Kopfjagd und Menschenopfer in Assam und Birma und ihre Ausstrahlungen nach Vorderindien. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien XXXVII: 1–65.Google Scholar
Higham, Charles & Lu, Tracey
1998 The origins and dispersal of rice cultivation. Antiquity 72: 867–877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ho Dah-an (何大安)
2016 Such errors could have been avoided: Review of Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction by William H. Baxter and Laurent Sagart. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 44(1): 175–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Yaowu, Wang, Shougong, Luan, Fengshi, Wang, Changsui & Richards, Michael P.
2008 Stable isotope analysis of humans from Xiaojingshan site: Implications for understanding the origin of millet agriculture in China. Journal of Archaeological Science 35: 2960–2965. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Xuehui et al.
2012 A map of rice genome variation reveals the origin of cultivated rice. Nature 490: 497–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huerta-Sánchez, Emilia et al.
2014 Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature 512: 194–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilumäe, Anne-Mai et al.
2016 Human Y chromosome haplogroup N: A non-trivial time-resolved phylogeography that cuts across language families. American Journal of Human Genetics 99: 163–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karafet, Tatiana M., Fernando L. Mendez, Herawati Sudoyo, J. Stephen Lansing and Michael F. Hammer
2015 Improved phylogenetic resolution and rapid diversification of Y-chromosome haplogroup K-M526 in Southeast Asia. European Journal of Human Genetics 23: 369–373.Google Scholar
Karmin, Monika et al.
2015 A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Research 25 (4): 459–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kivisild, Toomas
2014 Mapping chromosome diversity in Eurasia. Paper presented at the conference Migrations and Transfers in Prehistory Asian and Oceanic Ethnolinguistic Phylogeography, University of Bern, 28 to 30 July.
von Klaproth, Julius Heinrich
1823 Asia Polyglotta. Paris: A. Schubart.Google Scholar
1830 Réponse à quelques passages de la préface du roman chinois intitulé: Hao khieou tchhouan, traduit par M. J. F. Davis. Journal Asiatique V: 97–122.Google Scholar
Kovach, Michael J., Sweeney, Megan T. & McCouch, Susan
2007 New insights into the history of rice domestication. Trends in Genetics 23(11): 578–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, Michael J., Calingacion, Mariafe N., Fitzgerald, Melissa A. & McCough, Susan R.
2009 The origin and evolution of fragrance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 (34): 14444–14449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsona, Greger et al.
2014 Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(17): 6139–6146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li Liu
2015 A long process towards agriculture in the middle Yellow River valley, China: Evidence from macro- and micro-botanical remains. Journal of Indo-Pacific Archaeology 35: 3–14.Google Scholar
Londo, Jason P., Chiang, Yu-chung, Hung, Kuo-Hsiang, Chiang, Tzen-Yuh & Schaal, Barbara A.
2006 Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultuvated rice, Oryza sativa . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(25): 9578–9583. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, Felipe R. et al.
2014 A genetic mechanism for Tibetan high-altitude adaptation. Nature Genetics 46(9): 951–958. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lou, Haiyi et al.
2015 A 3.4-kb copy-number deletion near EPAS1 is significantly enriched in high-altitude Tibetans but absent from the Denisovan sequence. American Journal of Human Genetics 97 (1): 54–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Dongsheng et al.
2016 Ancestral origins and genetic history of Tibetan highlanders. American Journal of Human Genetics 99 (3): 580–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Tracey (= Lǚ Lièdān
) 2006 The occurrence of cereal cultivation in China. Asian Perspectives 45 (2): 129–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
) 2009 Prehistoric coexistence: The expansion of farming society from the Yangtze River Valley to western South China. Asian Perspectives (Senri Ethnological Studies) 74: 47–52.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McNally, Kenneth L. et al.
2009 Genome-wide SNP variation reveals relationships among landraces and modern varieties of rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(30): 12273–12278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mirabal, Sheyla et al.
2009 Y chromosome distribution within the geolinguistic landscape of northwestern Russia. European Journal of Human Genetics 2009: 1–14.Google Scholar
Molina, Jeanmaire et al.
2011 Molecular evidence for a single evolutionary origin of domesticated rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(20): 8351–8356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Friedrich Max
1872 Über die Resultate der Sprachwissenschaft: Vorlesung gehalten in der kaiserlichen Universitæt zu Strassburg am XXIII. Mai MCCCCLXXII. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner & London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Nakamura Shin-ichi
2010 The origin of rice cultivation in the Lower Yangtze region. China. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 2(2): 107–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nasu, Hirō, Momohara, Arata, Yasuda, Yoshinori & He, Jiejun
2006 The occurrence and identification of Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv. (foxtail millet) grains from the Chengtoushan site (ca. 5800 cal B.P.) in central China, with reference to the domestication centre in Asia. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 16(6): 481–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostapirat, Weera
2005 Kra-Dai and Austronesian: Notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. In The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Linguistics and Genetics, Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds), 107–131. London: Routledge Curzon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Austro-Tai revisited. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistic Society, Chulalongkorn University, 29 May.
Oxenham, Marc F. et al.
2015 Emergence and diversification of the Neolithic in southern Vietnam: Insights from coastal Rach Nui. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 10(3): 309–338. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pal, J. N.
1990 The early farming culture of northern India. Bulletin of Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute 49: 297–304.Google Scholar
Parsons, B. J., Newbury, H. J. & Jackson, M. T.
1999 The genetic structure and conservation of aus, aman and boro rices from Bangladesh. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46(6): 587–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pictet, Adolphe
1859, 1863 Les origines indo-européennes ou les aryas primitifs: Essai de paléontologie linguistique (première partie, seconde partie). Paris: Joël Cherbuliez.Google Scholar
Poloni, Estella Simone et al.
1997 Human genetic affinities for Y chromosome P49a,f/TaqI haploptypes show strong correspondence with linguistics. American Journal of Human Genetics 61: 1015–1035 (cf. the erratum published in 1998 in the American Journal of Human Genetics 62: 1267). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poloni, Estella Simone, Ray, Nicolas, Schneider, Stefan & Langaney, André
2000 Languages and genes: Modes of transmission observed through the analysis of male-specific and female-specific genes. In Proceedings: Evolution of Language, 3rd International Conference 3–6 April 2000, Jean-Louis Dessalles & Laleh Ghadakpour (eds), 185–186. Paris: École Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin George
1983 The Chinese and their neighbours in prehistoric and early historic times. In The Origins of Chinese Civilization, David N. Keightley (ed.), 411–466. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha
2004 Vocabulary of environment and subsistence in the Hmong-Mien protolanguage. In Hmong/Miao in Asia, Nicholas Tapp, Jean Michaud, Christian Culas & Gary Yia Lee (eds), 147–165. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.Google Scholar
2010 Hmong-Mien Language History. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Reddy, B. Mohan et al.
2007 Austro-Asiatic tribes of Northeast India provide hitherto missing genetic link between South and Southeast Asia. Public Library of Science One 2 (11): e1141. Crossref.Google Scholar
Rootsi, Siiri et al.
2007 A counter-clockwise northern route of the Y-chromosome haplogroup N from Southeast Asia towards Europe. European Journal of Human Genetics 15: 204–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruddiman, William F., Guo, Zhengtang, Zhou, Xin, Wu, Hanbin & Yu, Yanyan
2008 Early rice farming and anomalous methane trends. Quaternary Science Reviews 27: 1291–1295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, Sanghamitra et al.
2006 A prehistory of Indian Y chromosomes: Evaluating demic diffusion scenarios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(4): 843–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, Gustave
1901 Review: Elements of Siamese Grammar by O. Frankfurter, PhD. Bangkok: Printed at the American Presbyterian Mission Press, Leipzig, Karl W. Hiersemann 1900, T‘oung Pao (Série II) II: 76–87.Google Scholar
1902 Siamese Studies [T‘oung Pao, New Series II, Volume II, Supplement]. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sharma, Govardhan R., Misra, V. D., Mandal, D., Misra, B. B. & Pal, J. N.
1980 Beginnings of Agriculture: From Hunting and Food Gathering to Domestication of Plants and Animals. Allahabad: Abhinav Prakashan.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul & Blench, Roger
2011 The Austroasiatic Urheimat: The southeastern riverine hypothesis. In Dynamics of Human Diversity: The Case of Mainland Southeast Asia, Nick J. Enfield (ed.), 317–345. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Silva, Fabio et al.
2015 Modelling the geographical origin of rice cultivation in Asia using the rice archaeological database. PLOS One 21. <Crossref>.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley
2005 (posthumous). Proto-East-Asian and the origin and dispersal of languages of East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific. In The Peopling of East Asia: Putting Together Archaeology, Lingtuistics and Genetics, Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds), 182–197. London: Routledge Curzon (Editorial misrepresentations that had crept into Starosta’s posthumously published East Asian phylogeny were rectified that same year (cf. van Driem 2005)). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Chris J. et al.
2016 Between China and South Asia: A Middle Asian corridor of crop dispersal and agricultural innovation in the Bronze Age. The Holocene 26(10): 1541–1555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strecker, David
1987 The Hmong-Mien languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 10(2): 1–11.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Megan T. & McCouch, Susan R.
2007 The complex history of the domestication of rice. Annals of Botany 100: 951–957. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, Megan T. et al.
2007 Global dissemination of a single mutation conferring white pericarp in rice. Public Library of Science – Genetics 3(8): 1418–1424.Google Scholar
Vavilov, Nikolaj Ivanovič
1926 Centry proisxoždenija kulturnyx rastenij (Studies on the origin of cultivated plants). Trudy po Prikladnoj Botanike, Genetike i Selekcii (Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding) 16(2): 1–248.Google Scholar
Wang, Chuan-Chao, Yan, Shi, Qin, Zhen-Dong, Lu, Yan & Ding, Qi-Liang
2013 Late Neolithic expansion of ancient Chinese revealed by Y chromosome haplogroup O3a1c-002611. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 51 (3): 280–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Steve, Lehman, Heather, Barela, Timothy, Hawks, Sean & Harriman, David
2010 Rice or millets: Early farming strategies in prehistoric central Thailand. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 2(2): 79–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, Kun et al.
2013 Identification of a Tibetan-specific mutation in the hypoxic gene EGLN1 and its contribution to high-altitude adaptation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(8): 1889–1898. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Shi et al.
2011 An updated tree of Y-chromosome haplogroup O and revised phylogenetic positions of mutations P164 and PK4. European Journal of Human Genetics 19(9): 1013–1015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Xiaoyan et al.
2016 New radiocarbon evidence on early rice consumption and farming in South China. The Holocene 7. <Crossref>.Google Scholar
Yao, Xiaotian et al.
2017 Improved phylogenetic resolution for Y-chromosome haplogroup O2a1c-002611. Scientific Reports 7: 1146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhao Zhijun
2010 New data and new issues for the study of the origin of rice agriculture in China. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 2 (2): 99–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhāng Hóngmíng
1998 Chinese etyma for river. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 26(1): 1–47.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Chaubey, Gyaneshwer & George van Driem
2020. Munda languages are father tongues, but Japanese and Korean are not. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 Crossref logo
Kutanan, Wibhu, Jatupol Kampuansai, Metawee Srikummool, Andrea Brunelli, Silvia Ghirotto, Leonardo Arias, Enrico Macholdt, Alexander Hübner, Roland Schröder, Mark Stoneking & Connie Mulligan
2019. Contrasting Paternal and Maternal Genetic Histories of Thai and Lao Populations. Molecular Biology and Evolution 36:7 ► pp. 1490 ff. Crossref logo
Kutanan, Wibhu, Dang Liu, Jatupol Kampuansai, Metawee Srikummool, Suparat Srithawong, Rasmi Shoocongdej, Sukrit Sangkhano, Sukhum Ruangchai, Pittayawat Pittayaporn, Leonardo Arias, Mark Stoneking & Bing Su
2021. Reconstructing the Human Genetic History of Mainland Southeast Asia: Insights from Genome-Wide Data from Thailand and Laos. Molecular Biology and Evolution Crossref logo
Nelson, Sarah, Irina Zhushchikhovskaya, Tao Li, Mark Hudson & Martine Robbeets
2020. Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 Crossref logo
Tagore, Debashree, Farhang Aghakhanian, Rakesh Naidu, Maude E. Phipps & Analabha Basu
2021. Insights into the demographic history of Asia from common ancestry and admixture in the genomic landscape of present-day Austroasiatic speakers. BMC Biology 19:1 Crossref logo
van Schendel, Willem
2020.  In Shadow Exchanges along the New Silk Roads, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.