Cover not available
Part of
Language Dispersal Beyond Farming
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev
[Not in series 215] 2017
► pp. 275–290

Chapter 12
Agricultural terms in Indo-Iranian

| Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
The article investigates the agricultural lexicon of Indo-Iranian, especially its earlier records, and what it may tell us about the spread of farming. After some general remarks on “Neolithic” vocabulary, a short overview of the animal husbandry terminology shows that this field of vocabulary was evidently well-established in Proto-Indo-Iranian, with many cognate terms. Words for cattle, horses, sheep and goats are well developed and mostly inherited, while evidence for pigs is more limited, ad the words for donkey and camel look like common loans. A more extensive discussion of plant terminology reveals that while some generic terms for grain are inherited, more specific words for different kinds of cereals show few inherited terms and/or irregular variation, and the same is even clearer for pulses and some other vegetables. The terminology for agricultural terminology is largely different from that of most European branches of Indo-European. The conclusion is that the cultural background behind these linguistic data points to spreading of a mainly pastoralist culture in the case of Indo-Iranian.
Keywords: Indo-Iranian, husbandry terms, plant cultivation, agricultural technology, pastoralist
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Neolithic” vocabulary
    • 2.1General remarks
    • 2.2Terms for domestic animals
    • 2.3Agricultural plants
      • 2.3.1Cereals
        • 1.General terms
        • 2.‘Barley’ Hordeum vulgare
        • 3.‘Wheat’ Triticum sp.
        • 4.‘Oats’ Avena sativa
        • 5.‘Rye’ Secale cereale
        • 6.‘Rice’ Oryza sativa
        • 7.‘Broomcorn millet’ Panicum miliaceum
        • 8.‘Foxtail millet’ Setaria (italica)
      • 2.3.2Pulses
        • 1.‘Bean’ Vicia faba (Europe); ‘Vetch’ Vicia ervilia, Vicia sativa and ‘Munɡ bean’ Vigna radiata (< Iran); ‘Black bean’ Vigna mungo (< India)
        • 2.‘Lentil’ Lens culinaris
        • 3.For different types of ‘peas’, there is a variety of different terms, partly overlapping with those for other pulses
      • 2.3.3Some other vegetables
        • 1.‘Onion’ Allium cepa and ‘Leek’ Allium ampeloprasum
        • 2.‘Garlic’ Allium sativum
    • 2.4Agricultural technology
      • 1.‘Field, cultivated plants’
      • 2.‘To plough’, ‘to sow’
      • 3.‘Plough’ and its parts
  • 3.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 21 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.12kum
References (38)
References
Abaev, Vladimir Iljič. 1979. Istoriko-Ėtimologičeskij Slovar’ Osetinskogo Jazyka, Vol. 3. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Adams, Douglas Q. 1999. A Dictionary of Tocharian B [Leiden Studies in Indo-European 10]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bailey, Harold Walter. 1960. Indagatio Indo-Iranica. TPS 59: 62–86.Google Scholar
. 1979. Dictionary of Khotan Saka. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bartholomae, Christian. 1904. Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav. 2005. Review of Witczak 2003. Sborník Prací Filozofické Fakulty Brněnské Univerzity [Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis A 53]. Linguistica Brunensia, 219–225.Google Scholar
. 2017. On Indo-European ‘barley’. In Etymology and the European lexicon. In Proceedings of the 14th Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17–22 September 2012, Copenhagen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Anette Olsen (eds), 53–67. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Edelman, Joy=Ėdel’man, Džoj Iosifovna. 2011. Etimologičeskij slovar’ iranskix jazykov. Tom 4, i-k. Moscow: Vostočnaja Literatura.Google Scholar
Emmerick, Ronald E. 1966. Some reinterpretations in the Avesta. TPS 65: 1–23.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1973. Once again on Iranian *ādu- . TPS 72: 137.Google Scholar
Henkelman, Wouter. 2010. “Consumed before the King.” The Table of Darius, that of Irdabama and Irtaštuna, and that of his Satrap, Karkiš. In Der Achämenidenhof / The Achaemenid Court. Akten des 2. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum Thema “Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen”, Landgut Castelen bei Basel, 23–25. Mai 2007, Bruno Jacobs, Robert Rollinger (ed.), Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Hock, Wolfgang et al. 2015. Altlitauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, unter der Leitung von W. H. und der Mitarbeit von Elvira-Julia Bukevi und Christiane Schiller bearbeitet von Rainer Fecht, Anna Helene Feulner, Eugen Hill und Dagmar S. Wodtko, 2 Vols. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Hyllested, Adam. 2017. Again on pigs in ancient Europe: The Fennic connection. In Etymology and the European lexicon. Proceedings of the 14th Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17–22 September 2012, Copenhagen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Anette Olsen (eds), 183–196. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Katz, Hartmut. 1983. Hethitisch hišša- und Zubehör. Orientalia 52: 116–122.Google Scholar
. 2003. Studien zu den älteren indoiranischen Lehnwörtern in den uralischen Sprachen, aus dem Nachlaß hrsg. von Paul Widmer, Anna Widmer und Gerson Klumpp. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2016. Is ancient old and modern new? Fallacies of attestation and reconstruction (with special focus on Indo-Iranian). In Proceedings of the 27th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, October 23rd and 24th, 2015, David M. Goldstein, Stephanie W. Jamison, Brent Vine (eds), 79–96. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Kuz’mina, Elena E. 2007. The origins of the Indo-Iranians, J. P. Mallory (ed.). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lubotsky, Alexander M. 2001. The Indo-Iranian substratum. In Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European. Linguistic and archaeological considerations. Papers presented at an international symposium held at the Tvärminne Research Station of the University of Helsinki, 8–10 January 1999, Christian Carpelan, Asko Parpola, Petteri Koskikallio (eds), 301–317. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
2002. Scythian Elements in Old Iranian. In Indo-Iranian Languages and Peoples [Proceedings of the British Academy 116], Nicholas Sims-Williams (ed.), 189–202. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1992, 1996, 2001. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen, 3 Vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg. 1929. Indo-Iranian Frontier Languages, Vol. I: Parači and Ormuri. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
. 1938. Indo-Iranian Frontier Languages, Vol. II: Iranian Pamir Languages (Yidgha-Munji, Sanglechi-Ishkashmi and Wakhi). Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
. 1974. Etymological Vocabulary of the Shughni Group. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
. 2003. A New Etymological Vocabulary of Paṣ̌to, compiled and edited by J. Elfenbein, D. N. MacKenzie and Nicholas Sims-Williams. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, Alexander S. 2014. Greek εἱαµενή, Vedic yávasa- . Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 68: 127–140.Google Scholar
Pachalina, Tat’jana N. 1983. Issledovanie po sravnitel’no-istoričkoj fonetike pamirskich jazykov. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Parpola, Asko. 2012. The Dāsas of the Ṛgveda as Proto‒Sakas of the Yaz I‒related cultures: With a revised model for the protohistory of Indo-Iranian speakers. In Archaeology and Language: Indo-European Studies Presented to James P. Mallory, Martin E. Huld, Karlene Jones-Bley, Dean Miller (eds), 221–264. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Pinault, Georges-Jean. 1997. Terminologie de petit bétail en Tokharien. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 2: 175–218.Google Scholar
Rastorgueva, Vera S. & Edelman, Joy I.=Ėdel’man, Džoj Iosifovna. 2000, 2003, 2007. Etimologičeskij slovar’ iranskix jazykov. Tom 1, a-ā; Tom 2, b-d; Tom 3 f-h. Moscow: Vostočnaja Literatura.Google Scholar
Rédei, Károly. 1986. Zu den indogermanisch-uralischen Sprachkontakten. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Adriano. 2010. Possiamo continuare a connettere ir. *ādu- a ie. ‘mangiare’? In Scritti in onore di Eric Pratt Hamp per il suo 90. compleanno, G. Belluscio, A. Mendicino (eds), 331–344. Cosenza: Università della Calabria, Centro Editoriale e Librario.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei. 1988. Indoevropejsko-servernokavkazskije izoglossy. In Drevnij Vostok: Etnokul’turnye svjazi LXXX, G. M. Bongrad-Levin, V. G. Arzinba (ed.), 112–163. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Steblin-Kamenskij, Ivan M. 1999. Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ vachanskogo jazyka. St. Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1969. Etyma latina II (7–18). In Studi linguistici in onore di Vittore Pisani, Vol. II, 963–994. Brescia: Paideia.Google Scholar
Vine, Brent. 2009. A yearly problem. In East and West, Papers in Indo-European Studies, Kazuhiko Yoshida & Brent Vine (eds), 205–224. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Witczak, Krzysztof Tomasz. 2003. Indoeuropejskie nazwy zbóż. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lódzkiego.Google Scholar
Witzel, Michael. 2009. The linguistic history of some Indian domestic plants. Journal of BioSciences 34 (6): 829–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhivlov, Mikhail. 2014. Studies in Uralic vocalism III. Journal of Language Relationship / Voprosy jazykovogo rodstva 12: 113–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Camiel Hamans & Hans Henrich Hock
2024. Language, History, Ideology, DOI logo
Kroonen, Guus, Anthony Jakob, Axel I. Palmér, Paulus van Sluis, Andrew Wigman & Søren Wichmann
2022. Indo-European cereal terminology suggests a Northwest Pontic homeland for the core Indo-European languages. PLOS ONE 17:10 ► pp. e0275744 ff. DOI logo
Telezhko, G. M.
2022. Research on the Structure of Indo-European Dialect Continuum by Comparing Swadesh Lists of the Closest Descendant Languages. Discourse 8:2 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Nelson, Sarah, Irina Zhushchikhovskaya, Tao Li, Mark Hudson & Martine Robbeets
2020. Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 DOI logo
Robbeets, Martine & Chuan-Chao Wang
2020. About millets and beans, words and genes. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.