Chapter published in:
Language Dispersal Beyond Farming
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Alexander Savelyev
[Not in series 215] 2017
► pp. 275–290

Chapter 12
Agricultural terms in Indo-Iranian

| Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
The article investigates the agricultural lexicon of Indo-Iranian, especially its earlier records, and what it may tell us about the spread of farming. After some general remarks on “Neolithic” vocabulary, a short overview of the animal husbandry terminology shows that this field of vocabulary was evidently well-established in Proto-Indo-Iranian, with many cognate terms. Words for cattle, horses, sheep and goats are well developed and mostly inherited, while evidence for pigs is more limited, ad the words for donkey and camel look like common loans. A more extensive discussion of plant terminology reveals that while some generic terms for grain are inherited, more specific words for different kinds of cereals show few inherited terms and/or irregular variation, and the same is even clearer for pulses and some other vegetables. The terminology for agricultural terminology is largely different from that of most European branches of Indo-European. The conclusion is that the cultural background behind these linguistic data points to spreading of a mainly pastoralist culture in the case of Indo-Iranian.
Keywords: Indo-Iranian, husbandry terms, plant cultivation, agricultural technology, pastoralist
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Neolithic” vocabulary
    • 2.1General remarks
    • 2.2Terms for domestic animals
    • 2.3Agricultural plants
      • 2.3.1Cereals
        • 1.General terms
        • 2.‘Barley’ Hordeum vulgare
        • 3.‘Wheat’ Triticum sp.
        • 4.‘Oats’ Avena sativa
        • 5.‘Rye’ Secale cereale
        • 6.‘Rice’ Oryza sativa
        • 7.‘Broomcorn millet’ Panicum miliaceum
        • 8.‘Foxtail millet’ Setaria (italica)
      • 2.3.2Pulses
        • 1.‘Bean’ Vicia faba (Europe); ‘Vetch’ Vicia ervilia, Vicia sativa and ‘Munɡ bean’ Vigna radiata (< Iran); ‘Black bean’ Vigna mungo (< India)
        • 2.‘Lentil’ Lens culinaris
        • 3.For different types of ‘peas’, there is a variety of different terms, partly overlapping with those for other pulses
      • 2.3.3Some other vegetables
        • 1.‘Onion’ Allium cepa and ‘Leek’ Allium ampeloprasum
        • 2.‘Garlic’ Allium sativum
    • 2.4Agricultural technology
      • 1.‘Field, cultivated plants’
      • 2.‘To plough’, ‘to sow’
      • 3.‘Plough’ and its parts
  • 3.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 21 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.215.12kum
References

References

Abaev, Vladimir Iljič
1979 Istoriko-Ėtimologičeskij Slovar’ Osetinskogo Jazyka, Vol. 3. Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Adams, Douglas Q.
1999 A Dictionary of Tocharian B [Leiden Studies in Indo-European 10]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bailey, Harold Walter
1960 Indagatio Indo-Iranica. TPS 59: 62–86.Google Scholar
1979 Dictionary of Khotan Saka. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bartholomae, Christian
1904 Altiranisches Wörterbuch. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav
2005 Review of Witczak 2003. Sborník Prací Filozofické Fakulty Brněnské Univerzity [Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis A 53]. Linguistica Brunensia, 219–225.Google Scholar
2017 On Indo-European ‘barley’. In Etymology and the European lexicon. In Proceedings of the 14th Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft 17–22 September 2012, Copenhagen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Anette Olsen (eds), 53–67. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Edelman, Joy=Ėdel’man, Džoj Iosifovna
2011 Etimologičeskij slovar’ iranskix jazykov. Tom 4, i-k. Moscow: Vostočnaja Literatura.Google Scholar
Emmerick, Ronald E.
1966 Some reinterpretations in the Avesta. TPS 65: 1–23.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P.
1973 Once again on Iranian *ādu- . TPS 72: 137.Google Scholar
Henkelman, Wouter
2010 “Consumed before the King.” The Table of Darius, that of Irdabama and Irtaštuna, and that of his Satrap, Karkiš. In Der Achämenidenhof / The Achaemenid Court. Akten des 2. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum Thema “Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen”, Landgut Castelen bei Basel, 23–25. Mai 2007, Bruno Jacobs, Robert Rollinger (ed.), Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Hock, Wolfgang et al.
2015 Altlitauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, unter der Leitung von W. H. und der Mitarbeit von Elvira-Julia Bukevi und Christiane Schiller bearbeitet von Rainer Fecht, Anna Helene Feulner, Eugen Hill und Dagmar S. Wodtko, 2 Vols. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Hyllested, Adam
2017 Again on pigs in ancient Europe: The Fennic connection. In Etymology and the European lexicon. Proceedings of the 14th Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 17–22 September 2012, Copenhagen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander & Birgit Anette Olsen (eds), 183–196. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Katz, Hartmut
1983 Hethitisch hišša- und Zubehör. Orientalia 52: 116–122.Google Scholar
2003 Studien zu den älteren indoiranischen Lehnwörtern in den uralischen Sprachen, aus dem Nachlaß hrsg. von Paul Widmer, Anna Widmer und Gerson Klumpp. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin Joachim
2016 Is ancient old and modern new? Fallacies of attestation and reconstruction (with special focus on Indo-Iranian). In Proceedings of the 27th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Los Angeles, October 23rd and 24th, 2015, David M. Goldstein, Stephanie W. Jamison, Brent Vine (eds), 79–96. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Kuz’mina, Elena E.
2007 The origins of the Indo-Iranians, J. P. Mallory (ed.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lubotsky, Alexander M.
2001 The Indo-Iranian substratum. In Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European. Linguistic and archaeological considerations. Papers presented at an international symposium held at the Tvärminne Research Station of the University of Helsinki, 8–10 January 1999, Christian Carpelan, Asko Parpola, Petteri Koskikallio (eds), 301–317. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
2002 Scythian Elements in Old Iranian. In Indo-Iranian Languages and Peoples [Proceedings of the British Academy 116], Nicholas Sims-Williams (ed.), 189–202. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred
1992, 1996, 2001 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindoarischen, 3 Vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg
1929 Indo-Iranian Frontier Languages, Vol. I: Parači and Ormuri. Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
1938 Indo-Iranian Frontier Languages, Vol. II: Iranian Pamir Languages (Yidgha-Munji, Sanglechi-Ishkashmi and Wakhi). Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
1974 Etymological Vocabulary of the Shughni Group. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
2003 A New Etymological Vocabulary of Paṣ̌to, compiled and edited by J. Elfenbein, D. N. MacKenzie and Nicholas Sims-Williams. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Nikolaev, Alexander S.
2014 Greek εἱαµενή, Vedic yávasa- . Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 68: 127–140.Google Scholar
Pachalina, Tat’jana N.
1983 Issledovanie po sravnitel’no-istoričkoj fonetike pamirskich jazykov. Moscow: “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Parpola, Asko
2012 The Dāsas of the Ṛgveda as Proto‒Sakas of the Yaz I‒related cultures: With a revised model for the protohistory of Indo-Iranian speakers. In Archaeology and Language: Indo-European Studies Presented to James P. Mallory, Martin E. Huld, Karlene Jones-Bley, Dean Miller (eds), 221–264. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Pinault, Georges-Jean
1997 Terminologie de petit bétail en Tokharien. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 2: 175–218.Google Scholar
Rastorgueva, Vera S. & Edelman, Joy I.=Ėdel’man, Džoj Iosifovna
2000, 2003, 2007 Etimologičeskij slovar’ iranskix jazykov. Tom 1, a-ā; Tom 2, b-d; Tom 3 f-h. Moscow: Vostočnaja Literatura.Google Scholar
Rédei, Károly
1986 Zu den indogermanisch-uralischen Sprachkontakten. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Adriano
2010 Possiamo continuare a connettere ir. *ādu- a ie. ‘mangiare’? In Scritti in onore di Eric Pratt Hamp per il suo 90. compleanno, G. Belluscio, A. Mendicino (eds), 331–344. Cosenza: Università della Calabria, Centro Editoriale e Librario.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei
1988 Indoevropejsko-servernokavkazskije izoglossy. In Drevnij Vostok: Etnokul’turnye svjazi LXXX, G. M. Bongrad-Levin, V. G. Arzinba (ed.), 112–163. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Steblin-Kamenskij, Ivan M.
1999 Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ vachanskogo jazyka. St. Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald
1969 Etyma latina II (7–18). In Studi linguistici in onore di Vittore Pisani, Vol. II, 963–994. Brescia: Paideia.Google Scholar
Vine, Brent
2009 A yearly problem. In East and West, Papers in Indo-European Studies, Kazuhiko Yoshida & Brent Vine (eds), 205–224. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Witczak, Krzysztof Tomasz
2003 Indoeuropejskie nazwy zbóż. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lódzkiego.Google Scholar
Witzel, Michael
2009 The linguistic history of some Indian domestic plants. Journal of BioSciences 34 (6): 829–833. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhivlov, Mikhail
2014 Studies in Uralic vocalism III. Journal of Language Relationship / Voprosy jazykovogo rodstva 12: 113–148.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Nelson, Sarah, Irina Zhushchikhovskaya, Tao Li, Mark Hudson & Martine Robbeets
2020. Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 Crossref logo
Robbeets, Martine & Chuan-Chao Wang
2020. About millets and beans, words and genes. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.