References

References

Amsen, E.
(2014, January 22). The Twitter view on peer review. F1000Research. Retrieved from http://​blog​.f1000research​.com​/2014​/01​/22​/the​-twitter​-view​-on​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020) Google Scholar
Brown, A. M. L.
(2015, November 10). How not to be Reviewer #2. Retrieved from https://​amlbrown​.com​/2015​/11​/10​/how​-not​-to​-be​-reviewer​-2/ (28 January, 2020)
Cohen, P.
(2010, August 23). Scholars test web alternative to peer review. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://​www​.nytimes​.com​/2010​/08​/24​/arts​/24peer​.html (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
Digital Pedagogy Lab
. (n.d.). Hybrid pedagogy: A digital journal of learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://​www​.digitalpedagogylab​.com​/hybridped​/submissions/ (21 February, 2017).
Elsevier
(2017) Scopus®. Retrieved from https://​www​.elsevier​.com​/solutions​/scopus (4 January, 2017).
Ferguson, C., Marcus, A., & Oransky, I.
(2014, November 26). Publishing: The peer-review scam. Nature, 515(7528). Retrieved from http://​www​.nature​.com​/news​/publishing​-the​-peer​-review​-scam​-1​.16400 (28 January, 2020). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hames, I.
(2013, March). COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. Committee on Publication Ethics. Retrieved from https://​publicationethics​.org​/files​/Peer%20review%20guidelines​.pdf (28 January, 2020).
(2015, June 22). Re: The problem(s) with credit for peer review [Blog comment]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Society for Scholarly Publishing. Retrieved from https://​scholarlykitchen​.sspnet​.org​/2015​/06​/17​/the​-problems​-with​-credit​-for​-peer​-review​/#comment​-59452 (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
Hartshorn, K. J.
(2016) The status of peer review in applied linguistics research. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(2), 155–181.Google Scholar
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P.
(2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6). Retrieved from https://​journals​.plos​.org​/plosone​/article​?id​=10​.1371​/journal​.pone​.0127502 (28 January, 2020). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucey, B.
(2013, September 27). Peer review: How to get it right – 10 tips. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/higher​-education​-network​/blog​/2013​/sep​/27​/peer​-review​-10​-tips​-research​-paper (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
McDermott, J. [ at redpenblackpen]
(2014, February 10). What peer review feels like. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/what​-peer​-review​-feels​-like/ (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
(2014, September 5). The dawn of peer review. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/the​-dawn​-of​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
(2015, April 22). Your manuscript on peer review. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/your​-manuscript​-on​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
(2016, January 21). Making a super villain. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/category​/comic/ (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
Mehmani, B.
(2016, September 22). Is open peer review the way forward? Elsevier. Retrieved from https://​www​.elsevier​.com​/reviewers​-update​/story​/innovation​-in​-publishing​/is​-open​-peer​-review​-the​-way​-forward (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
Milstein, S.
(2002, August 12). New Economy; Web-based peer-review programs are reducing turnaround time, postage bills and workload at many scholarly journals. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://​www​.nytimes​.com​/2002​/08​/12​/business​/new​-economy​-web​-based​-peer​-review​-programs​-are​-reducing​-turnaround​-time​-postage​.html (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
Movie-Moments
(2016, May 2). My life is good, really good – Nacho Libre, Jack Black. [Fair use movie clip]. From J. Black, D. Klawans, J. Pistor, & M. White (Producers) & J. Hess (Director), Nacho Libre [Motion Picture, 2006]. Hollywood, CA: Paramount Pictures. Retrieved from https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=A4w5slsO​_C0 (14 February, 2017).Google Scholar
Moylan, E.
(2015, March 26). Inappropriate manipulation of peer review. BioMed Central Blog. Retrieved from http://​blogs​.biomedcentral​.com​/bmcblog​/2015​/03​/26​/manipulation​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
Publons
. (n.d.). Track more of your research impact. Retrieved from https://​publons​.com​/about​/home/ (28 January, 2020).
Research Wahlberg [ at ResearchMark]
. (n.d.). Media tweets by Research Wahlberg. Retrieved from https://​twitter​.com​/ResearchMark​/media (28 January, 2020). Also available at https://​pbs​.twimg​.com​/media​/Czpgde3XEAA71oS​.jpg (28 January, 2020).
Retraction Watch
(2017) Archive for the ‘self peer review’ category. Retrieved from http://​retractionwatch​.com​/category​/by​-reason​-for​-retraction​/self​-peer​-review/ (4 January, 2017).
Reviewer 2 Must Be Stopped!
(n.d.) In Facebook [Public Group]. Retrieved from https://​www​.facebook​.com​/groups​/reviewer2/ (4 January, 2017).
Romano, A.
(2015, August 21). Academic journals are facing a battle to weed out fake peer reviews. The Daily Dot. Retrieved from http://​www​.dailydot​.com​/parsec​/academic​-journals​-retraction​-peer​-review​-scam/ (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
Ross-Hellauer, T.
(2016, October 30). Defining open peer review: Part one – competing definitions. [Blog]. OpenAIRE blog. Retrieved from https://​blogs​.openaire​.eu​/?p​=1371 (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. N.
(1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
SciRev
(2013–2017) All reviews received by SciRev. Retrieved from https://​scirev​.sc​/reviews/ (2 February, 2017).
Shaw, C.
(2013, October 4). Hundreds of open access journals accept fake science paper. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/higher​-education​-network​/2013​/oct​/04​/open​-access​-journals​-fake​-paper> (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
Shema, H.
(2014, June 28). An introduction to open peer review. [Blog]. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://​blogs​.scientificamerican​.com​/information​-culture​/an​-introduction​-to​-open​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020). Google Scholar
Swain, M.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tennant, J.
(2017, February 1). Who isn’t profiting off the backs of researchers? Discover Magazine. Retrieved from https://​www​.discovermagazine​.com​/technology​/who​-isnt​-profiting​-off​-the​-backs​-of​-researchers (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
TESOL
(2015) How to get published in TESOL and applied linguistics serials. Retrieved from https://​www​.tesol​.org​/docs​/default​-source​/books​/how​-to​-get​-published​-in​-applied​-linguistics​-serials​.pdf (28 January, 2020).
Vines, T.
(2015, June 17). The problem(s) with credit for peer review [Blog comment]. Retrieved from https://​scholarlykitchen​.sspnet​.org​/2015​/06​/17​/the​-problems​-with​-credit​-for​-peer​-review​/#comment​-59438 (28 January, 2020).
Wiley Author Services
 at yourpapersucks
. (n.d.). Shit my reviewers say: Collecting the finest real specimens of reviewer comments since 1456. Tumblr. Retrieved January 4 2017, from http://​shitmyreviewerssay​.tumblr​.com/ (14 February, 2017).Google Scholar

Additional resources

Beall, J.
(2017) List of standalone journals: Potential, possible, or probable scholarly open-access journals. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. Retrieved from https://​scholarlyoa​.com​/individual​-journals/ (4 January, 2017).Google Scholar
Committee on Publication Ethics
(2017) Resources. Retrieved from http://​publicationethics​.org​/resources (4 January, 2017).
Guardian News and Media
(2017) Publishing. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/higher​-education​-network​/publishing (4 January, 2017).Google Scholar
Springer Nature
(2017) Specials: The future of publishing. Nature. Retrieved January 4 2017, from http://​www​.nature​.com​/news​/specials​/scipublishing​/index​.html (4 January, 2017).Google Scholar
Wager, E., Simera, I., Kowalczuk, M., & Boughton, S.
(Eds.) (2017) Research integrity and peer review. BioMed Central. Retrieved January 4 2017, from http://​researchintegrityjournal​.biomedcentral​.com​/about (4 January, 2017).Google Scholar
Ware, M.
(2016) Peer review survey 2015. Publishing Research Consortium. Retrieved from http://​publishingresearchconsortium​.com​/index​.php​/133​-prc​-projects​/research​-reports​/prc​-peer​-review​-survey​-2015 (28 January, 2020).Google Scholar
Wiley Author Services
(2000–2016) Journal reviewers. Retrieved from https://​authorservices​.wiley​.com​/Reviewers​/journal​-reviewers​/index​.html (14 February, 2017).