References

References

Amsen, E.
(2014, January 22). The Twitter view on peer review. F1000Research. Retrieved from http://​blog​.f1000research​.com​/2014​/01​/22​/the​-twitter​-view​-on​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020)
Brown, A. M. L.
(2015, November 10). How not to be Reviewer #2. Retrieved from https://​amlbrown​.com​/2015​/11​/10​/how​-not​-to​-be​-reviewer​-2/ (28 January, 2020)
Cohen, P.
(2010, August 23). Scholars test web alternative to peer review. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://​www​.nytimes​.com​/2010​/08​/24​/arts​/24peer​.html (28 January, 2020).
Digital Pedagogy Lab
. (n.d.). Hybrid pedagogy: A digital journal of learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://​www​.digitalpedagogylab​.com​/hybridped​/submissions/ (21 February, 2017).
Elsevier
(2017) Scopus®. Retrieved from https://​www​.elsevier​.com​/solutions​/scopus (4 January, 2017).
Ferguson, C., Marcus, A., & Oransky, I.
(2014, November 26). Publishing: The peer-review scam. Nature, 515(7528). Retrieved from http://​www​.nature​.com​/news​/publishing​-the​-peer​-review​-scam​-1​.16400 (28 January, 2020). Crossref link
Hames, I.
(2013, March). COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. Committee on Publication Ethics. Retrieved from https://​publicationethics​.org​/files​/Peer%20review%20guidelines​.pdf (28 January, 2020).
(2015, June 22). Re: The problem(s) with credit for peer review [Blog comment]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Society for Scholarly Publishing. Retrieved from https://​scholarlykitchen​.sspnet​.org​/2015​/06​/17​/the​-problems​-with​-credit​-for​-peer​-review​/#comment​-59452 (28 January, 2020).
Hartshorn, K. J.
(2016) The status of peer review in applied linguistics research. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(2), 155–181.
Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P.
(2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6). Retrieved from https://​journals​.plos​.org​/plosone​/article​?id​=10​.1371​/journal​.pone​.0127502 (28 January, 2020). Crossref link
Lucey, B.
(2013, September 27). Peer review: How to get it right – 10 tips. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/higher​-education​-network​/blog​/2013​/sep​/27​/peer​-review​-10​-tips​-research​-paper (28 January, 2020).
McDermott, J. [ at redpenblackpen]
(2014, February 10). What peer review feels like. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/what​-peer​-review​-feels​-like/ (28 January, 2020).
(2014, September 5). The dawn of peer review. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/the​-dawn​-of​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020).
(2015, April 22). Your manuscript on peer review. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/your​-manuscript​-on​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020).
(2016, January 21). Making a super villain. The Mad Scientist Confectioner’s Club. [Blog]. Retrieved from http://​jasonya​.com​/wp​/category​/comic/ (28 January, 2020).
Mehmani, B.
(2016, September 22). Is open peer review the way forward? Elsevier. Retrieved from https://​www​.elsevier​.com​/reviewers​-update​/story​/innovation​-in​-publishing​/is​-open​-peer​-review​-the​-way​-forward (28 January, 2020).
Milstein, S.
(2002, August 12). New Economy; Web-based peer-review programs are reducing turnaround time, postage bills and workload at many scholarly journals. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://​www​.nytimes​.com​/2002​/08​/12​/business​/new​-economy​-web​-based​-peer​-review​-programs​-are​-reducing​-turnaround​-time​-postage​.html (28 January, 2020).
Movie-Moments
(2016, May 2). My life is good, really good – Nacho Libre, Jack Black. [Fair use movie clip]. From J. Black, D. Klawans, J. Pistor, & M. White (Producers) & J. Hess (Director), Nacho Libre [Motion Picture, 2006]. Hollywood, CA: Paramount Pictures. Retrieved from https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=A4w5slsO​_C0 (14 February, 2017).
Moylan, E.
(2015, March 26). Inappropriate manipulation of peer review. BioMed Central Blog. Retrieved from http://​blogs​.biomedcentral​.com​/bmcblog​/2015​/03​/26​/manipulation​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020).
Publons
. (n.d.). Track more of your research impact. Retrieved from https://​publons​.com​/about​/home/ (28 January, 2020).
Research Wahlberg [ at ResearchMark]
. (n.d.). Media tweets by Research Wahlberg. Retrieved from https://​twitter​.com​/ResearchMark​/media (28 January, 2020). Also available at https://​pbs​.twimg​.com​/media​/Czpgde3XEAA71oS​.jpg (28 January, 2020).
Retraction Watch
(2017) Archive for the ‘self peer review’ category. Retrieved from http://​retractionwatch​.com​/category​/by​-reason​-for​-retraction​/self​-peer​-review/ (4 January, 2017).
Reviewer 2 Must Be Stopped!
(n.d.) In Facebook [Public Group]. Retrieved from https://​www​.facebook​.com​/groups​/reviewer2/ (4 January, 2017).
Romano, A.
(2015, August 21). Academic journals are facing a battle to weed out fake peer reviews. The Daily Dot. Retrieved from http://​www​.dailydot​.com​/parsec​/academic​-journals​-retraction​-peer​-review​-scam/ (28 January, 2020).
Ross-Hellauer, T.
(2016, October 30). Defining open peer review: Part one – competing definitions. [Blog]. OpenAIRE blog. Retrieved from https://​blogs​.openaire​.eu​/?p​=1371 (28 January, 2020).
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. N.
(1986) Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
SciRev
(2013–2017) All reviews received by SciRev. Retrieved from https://​scirev​.sc​/reviews/ (2 February, 2017).
Shaw, C.
(2013, October 4). Hundreds of open access journals accept fake science paper. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/higher​-education​-network​/2013​/oct​/04​/open​-access​-journals​-fake​-paper> (28 January, 2020).
Shema, H.
(2014, June 28). An introduction to open peer review. [Blog]. Scientific American. Retrieved from https://​blogs​.scientificamerican​.com​/information​-culture​/an​-introduction​-to​-open​-peer​-review/ (28 January, 2020).
Swain, M.
(1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tennant, J.
(2017, February 1). Who isn’t profiting off the backs of researchers? Discover Magazine. Retrieved from https://​www​.discovermagazine​.com​/technology​/who​-isnt​-profiting​-off​-the​-backs​-of​-researchers (28 January, 2020).
TESOL
(2015) How to get published in TESOL and applied linguistics serials. Retrieved from https://​www​.tesol​.org​/docs​/default​-source​/books​/how​-to​-get​-published​-in​-applied​-linguistics​-serials​.pdf (28 January, 2020).
Vines, T.
(2015, June 17). The problem(s) with credit for peer review [Blog comment]. Retrieved from https://​scholarlykitchen​.sspnet​.org​/2015​/06​/17​/the​-problems​-with​-credit​-for​-peer​-review​/#comment​-59438 (28 January, 2020).
Wiley Author Services
 at yourpapersucks
. (n.d.). Shit my reviewers say: Collecting the finest real specimens of reviewer comments since 1456. Tumblr. Retrieved January 4 2017, from http://​shitmyreviewerssay​.tumblr​.com/ (14 February, 2017).

Additional resources

Beall, J.
(2017) List of standalone journals: Potential, possible, or probable scholarly open-access journals. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. Retrieved from https://​scholarlyoa​.com​/individual​-journals/ (4 January, 2017).
Committee on Publication Ethics
(2017) Resources. Retrieved from http://​publicationethics​.org​/resources (4 January, 2017).
Guardian News and Media
(2017) Publishing. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://​www​.theguardian​.com​/higher​-education​-network​/publishing (4 January, 2017).
Springer Nature
(2017) Specials: The future of publishing. Nature. Retrieved January 4 2017, from http://​www​.nature​.com​/news​/specials​/scipublishing​/index​.html (4 January, 2017).
Wager, E., Simera, I., Kowalczuk, M., & Boughton, S.
(Eds.) (2017) Research integrity and peer review. BioMed Central. Retrieved January 4 2017, from http://​researchintegrityjournal​.biomedcentral​.com​/about (4 January, 2017).
Ware, M.
(2016) Peer review survey 2015. Publishing Research Consortium. Retrieved from http://​publishingresearchconsortium​.com​/index​.php​/133​-prc​-projects​/research​-reports​/prc​-peer​-review​-survey​-2015 (28 January, 2020).
Wiley Author Services
(2000–2016) Journal reviewers. Retrieved from https://​authorservices​.wiley​.com​/Reviewers​/journal​-reviewers​/index​.html (14 February, 2017).