Cover not available
Part of
Japanese Mood and Modality in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application
Edited by Ken-Ichi Kadooka
[Not in series 234] 2021
► pp. 133–176

Chapter 5
The cognitive and linguistic reasoning process of the speaker’s choice of modal expressions

Modality from the perspective of pragmatic impairment

| Aomori Chuo Gakuin University
The inability to use modality appropriately observed in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is generally viewed as pragmatic impairment. This current study explores the divergent modal usage of ASD individuals, viewing it as a pragmatic impairment to be examined from neurological, cognitive, and linguistic perspectives. Based on statistical data derived from observations of how ASD persons use modal expressions while speaking, this paper clarifies the nature of their pragmatic impairment and proposes a new model for research. Although Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) did not explore the cognitive side of language use, the current study supports the view that pragmatic competency is primarily a neurocognitive and secondarily a linguistic function. This is evidenced by the empirical studies of lexicogrammatical choices made by individuals with cognitive disability such as ASD, as the current study shows. The central issue is that seeing pragmatic impairment from the neurocognitive perspective tells us how various factors (in addition to language) are integrated when normal people engage in conversational exchange in interpersonal situations.
Keywords: Pragmatic impairment, modality, SFL, ASD, clinical linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework of SFL
    • 2.1Synoptic view of the text defined in SFL
    • 2.2Language as system network
    • 2.3Theoretical framework of modality in SFL constructs
    • 2.4Grammatical metaphor / metaphorical realization
    • 2.5Orientation
  • 3.General picture of ASD from the neurological perspective
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Corpus data and materials
      • 1.Corpus
      • 2.Participants
      • 3.Materials
    • 4.2Procedure
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Theory of Mind (ToM)
    • 6.2Executive function (EF)
    • 6.3Central coherence (CC)
    • 6.4Preference for expectation and inclination
  • 7.The process leading to pragmatic impairment
    • Procedure 1: Consideration of contexts of culture and situation
    • Procedure 2: Text-making processes in semantics, choices of lexicogrammar, and actual utterances
  • 8.Determinant factor of making choices
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations for grammatical items
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.234.04kat
References (78)
References
Abell, F., Happe, F., Frith, U. (2000). “Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development”. Cognitive Development 15, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) : Fifth Edition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1985). “Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind?’”. Cognition, 21, 37–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Lieslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1986). “Mechanical, behavioral and intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 113–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, K., and Wellman, H. (1995). Children talk about the mind. NY.: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, C. S. (2003). Structure and Function: An Introduction to Three Major Structural Functional Theories. Part 1: Approaches to the Simplex Clause. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., and Frith, U. (2002). “Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes” Brain, 125, 1839–1849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Fine, C., Lumsden, J. and Blair, R. J. R. (2001). “Dissociation between ‘theory of mind’ and executive functions in a patient with early left amygdala damage”. Brain, 124, 287–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frith, U. (1989). AUTISM: Explaining the Enigma. UK: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., Brooks, P. J., and Samuels, M. C. (1996). “Inference and action in early causal reasoning.” Developmental Psychology. 32:120–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, K. (2013). Taijin Kankei no Gengogaku: Poraitonesu kara no Nagame [Linguisitics of Interpersonal Relations: A view from Politeness]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
(2016). “Kino bunpo de no joho taikei / modarithi no teigi [Definition of mood system / modality in functional grammar].” Kadooka, K., Igarashi, K., Iimura, R., Fukuda, K. and S. Kato, Kino Bunpo ni yoru Nihongo modarithi Kenkyu [Studies in Japanese Modality Based on Functional Grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio. 113–172.Google Scholar
Fukui, T. (2010). “Some hints to understand executive function .” Japanese Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol.12. No.3・4.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. and Aslington, J. W. (1988). “Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction”. Child Development, 59(1), 26–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. (1976). Beyond Culture. N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). “Functional Diversity in Language as seen from a Consideration of Modality and Mood in English. Foundations of Language”, International Journal of Language and Philosophy, 6, 322–61.Google Scholar
(1978). Language as a Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: EdwardArnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning.: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Happe, F. G. E. (1994). “An Advanced Test of Theory of Mind: Understanding of Story Characters’ Thoughts and Feelings by Able Autistic, Mentally Handicapped, and Normal Children and Adults.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24. 129–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, B., Ide, S., Ikuta, S., Kawasaki, A. and Ogino, T. (1986). “Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English”. Journal of Pragmatics 10, 347–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobson, R. P., Ouston, J. and Lee, A. (1989). “Emotion-related and abstract concepts in autistic people: evidence from the British Picture Vocabulary Scale.” Journal of Autism ad Developmental Disorders, 4, 601–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, S. (1992). “On the Notion of Wakimae: Toward an Integrated Framework of Linguistic Politeness.” Mosaic of Language: Essays in Honour of Professor Natsuko Okuda. Mejiro Linguistic Sciety (MLS), 298–305.Google Scholar
(2006). Wakimae-no Goyoron [Pragmatics of Wakimae]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Kadooka, K., Iimura, R., Igarashi, K., Fukuda, K. and Kato, S. (2016). Kino Bunpo ni yoru Nihongo modarithi Kenkyu [Studies in Japanese Modality Based on Functional Grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kamio, A. (1997). Territory of Information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kandabashi, J. (1990). Seishinryouho mensetsu no kotsu [A knack for psychiatric interview]. Tokyo: Iwasaki Gakujutsu Shuppansha.Google Scholar
Kato, S. (2016a). Psychotherapy rinsho gengoron [Clinical linguistics for psychotherapy]. Tokyo: Akashi Shoten. Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
(2016b). “Tekusuto bunseki no naka de taijinteki shigen wo kangaeru [Thinking of interpersonal language resources in text analysis].” Kino Bunpo ni yoru Nihongo Modarithi Kenkyu [Studies in Japanese Modality Based on Functional Grammar]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers. 229–294.Google Scholar
(2019). “Jiheisho spectrum shogai no goyoronteki shogai kara toraeru ninchishinkeigaku/gengogakuteki gensho toshite no modarithi [Looking at Modality as a Neurocognitive and Linguistic Phenomenon from the Perspective of Pragmatic Impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder].” Japanese Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 10, 73–97.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, Y., Senju, A., Tojo, Y., Osanai, H., and Hasegawa, T. (2009). “Faces do not capture special attention in children with autism spectrum disorder: A change blindness study”. Child Development, 80, 1421–1433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klin, A. (2000). “Attributing Social Meaning to Ambiguous Visual Stimuli in Higher-functioning Autism and Asperger Syndrome: The Social Attribution Task.” J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 831–846. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Litowitz, B. (2005). “The Origins of Ethics: Deontic Modality.” International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies. 2(3):249–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, I. and McDonald, S. (2003). “Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders”. Brain and language, 85, 451–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1985). “Process and text: Two aspects of semiosis”: In J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse, Vol. I (pp. 248–274). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
(1991). “Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory”. Social Semiotics, 1 (1), 99–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992). English Text. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999). “Modeling Context: A Crooked Path of Progress in Contextual Linguistic”. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and Context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 25–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical Cartography. Tokyo: International Language Science Publisher.Google Scholar
McDonald, S. (1999). “Exploring the Process of Inference Generation in Sarcasm: A Review of Normal and Clinical Studies.” Brain and Language, 68, 486–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, P. (2004). Narrative Counseling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. and Roeck, A. D. (1997). “Autism and meta-representation: the case of epistemic modality”. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 113–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oi, M. (2006). “Koukinou Kouhansei hattatsushogai ni tomonau goyo shogai: tokuchou, haikei, shien [Pragmatic disorder with high-functioning pervasive developmental disorders].” The Japanese journal of communication disorders, 23, 87–104.Google Scholar
Ozonoff, S. (1997). “Components of executive function in autism and other disorders.” In J. Russell (Ed.), Autism as an Executive Disorder. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 179–211.Google Scholar
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F. and Rogers, S. J. (1991). “Executive function deficits in high functioning autistic individuals: relationship to theory of mind”. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, M. (1983a). “The acquisition of modal expressions.” Unpublished paper given at 1983 BAAI Annual Meeting Leicester Polytechnic.Google Scholar
(1983b). Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
(1991). “Production and comprehension of modal expressions by children with a pragmatic disability.” First Language, 11(33);416–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, M. R. and Firth, C. (1991). “Production and comprehension of modal expressions by children with a pragmatic disability”. First Language, 11, 61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perner, J. (1993). “The theory of mind deficit in autism: rethinking the metarepresentation theory.” In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg and D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding Other Mind. 112–137. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., and Bloom, P. (1990). “Natural Language and Natural Selection.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13 (4), 707–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, S. J. and Dawson, G. (2010). Early Start Denver Model for Young Children with Autism. N.Y.: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Roth, D. and Leslie, A. M. (1991). “The recognition of attitude conveyed by utterance: a study of preschool and autistic children”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 315–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. (1995). “At two with nature: agency and the development of self-world dualism.” In J. L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, and N. Eilan (Eds.) The body and the self. Cambridge: MIT Press; 127–51.Google Scholar
(1996). Agency: its role in mental development. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1997). “How executive disorders can bring about an inadequate ‘theory of mind’”. In J. Russell (Ed.), Autism as an Executive Disorder. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 256–304.Google Scholar
Senju, A., Tojo, Y., Dairoku, H., and Hasegawa, T. (2004). “Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism”. Journal of Child Psychol, Psychiatry, 45, 445–458.Google Scholar
Senju, J. (2014). “Kyoukan to jiheisho supekutoramusho [Empathy and autism spectrum symptoms].” Kyokan [empathy]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, Publishers.Google Scholar
Shatz, M., Wellman, H. M., and Silber, S. (1983). “The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state.” Cognition, 14(3), 301-321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2005). “Pragmatics”. In F. Jackson and M. Smith (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, 468–501. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, T. (2004). Komyunikeishon shougai toshite no jiheishou [Autism as communication disorder]. Advances in Research on Autism and Developmental Disorder, Vol.8, 3–23. Tokyo: Seiwa Shoten Publishers.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1992). “Autistic children’s talk about psychological states: deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind”. Child Development, 63, 161–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995). “Once upon a ribbit”: stories narrated by autistic children”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 45–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). “Language acquisition and theory of mind: contributions from the study of autism.” In L. B. Adamson and M. A. Romski (Eds.), Communication and Language Acquisition: Discoveries from Atypical Development, 135–60. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Teruya, K. (2007). A Systemic Functional Grammar of Japanese, Volume 1. N.Y.: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thomas, P., Kearney, G., Napier, E., Ellis, E., Leuder, I. and Johnson, M. (1996). “Speech and language in first onset psychosis differences between people with schizophrenia, mania, and controls”. British Journal of Psychiatry 168:337–343. Pubmed?. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P., King, K., Fraser, W. I. and Kendell, R. E. (1990). “Linguistic performance in schizophrenia: a comparison of acute and cronic patients”. British Journal of Psychiatry 156: 204–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vivanti, G. and Rogers, S. J. (2014). “Autism and the mirror neuron system: insights from learning and teaching.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 369: 20130184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volkmar, F. R. and Klin, A. (1993). “Social development in autism: historical and clinical perspectives”. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding Other Mind. 40–55. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. and McAnulty, L. (2000). “What do you have in mind? Belifs, knowledge and pragmatic impairment ”. In N. Muller (Ed.), Pragmatics and Clinical Applications, 29–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. (1983). “Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception.” Cognition, 13: 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziatas, K., Durkin, K. and Pratt, C. (2003). “Differences in assertive speech acts produced by children with autism Asperger syndrome, specific language impairment, and normal development.” Development and Psychopathology, 15, 73–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar