Cover not available
Part of
“All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo and Gonzalo Camiña
[Not in series 237] 2021
► pp. 1–20

Chapter 1
The making of the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts (CELiST), a bunch of disciplines

ORCID logo | University of A Coruña
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Biology or something else?
  • 2.The structure of CELiST
  • 3.The authors in CELiST
    • 3.1The sex of the authors
    • 3.2Geography
  • 4.The texts in CELiST
    • 4.1The genres in CELiST
  • Notes
  • Works cited
Published online: 10 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.237.01mos
References

Works cited

Adams, Valerie
1988 An Introduction to Modern English Word-Formation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aston, Guy
1997 “Small and large corpora in language learning”. In Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, and Melia, Barbara and James (eds.), Practical applications in language corpora. Lodz: Lodz University Press. 51–62.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
1999 Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan
1982 The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1988 Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Beddoes, Thomas
1799 Contributions to physical and medical knowledge, principally from the West of England, collected by Thomas Beddoes, M.D. Printed by Biggs & Cottle, for T. N. Longman and O. Rees, Paternoster-Row, London.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña
2015 Women writing science in the eighteenth century: some hints about their language use. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies, 24/2: 103–128.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña and Moskowich, Isabel
2010 CETA in the Context of the Coruña Corpus. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25/2: 153–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Involved in Writing Science: Nineteenth-Century Women in the Coruña Corpus. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2/5: 76–88.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert
2001 “Large corpora, small corpora and the learning of language”. In Ghadessy, Moshen; Henry, Alex and Roseberry, Robert L. (eds.), Small corpus studies and ELT. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne
2004 “The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language”. In Connor, Ulla and Upton, Thomas A. (eds.), Discourse in the Professions. Perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freire-Picos, María Angeles
2014 “Hacia la igualdad de género en las evaluaciones de calidad científica”. In Díaz López, Ana Jesús; González Penín, Anabel and Aguayo Lorenzo, Eva (eds.), II Xornada Universitaria Galega en Xénero, XUGeX: roles de xénero nun mundo globalizado. Universidade da Coruña 2014, 57–60. Retrieved February 18, 2020, from [URL]
Fyfe, Aileen and Røstvik, Camilla Mørk
2018 How female fellows fared at the Royal Society. Nature, 555: 159–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harari, Yuval N.
2014 Sapiens. A Brief History of Mankind. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Hume, David
1748 An Inquiry concerning Human Understanding, published by Andrew Millar. London: Strand.Google Scholar
Kastovsky, Dieter
2009 “Astronaut, astrology, astrophysics: About Combining Forms, Classical Compounds and Affixoids”. In McConchie, Rod W.; Honkapohja, Alpo and Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX 2. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 1–13.Google Scholar
Lareo, Inés; Monaco, Leida Maria; Esteve-Ramos, María José and Moskowich, Isabel
(comps.) 2020 The Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts (CELiST). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malpas, Jeff
2012 Donald Davidson. The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Retrieved February 17, 2020, from [URL]
Millward, Celia M. and Hayes, Mary
2012 A Biography of the English Language. Boston: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Monaco, Leida-Maria
2016 “Abstractness as diachronic variation in CEPhiT: Biber’s Dimension 5 applied”. In Moskowich, Isabel and Crespo, Begoña (eds.), ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 99–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel
2019 “An introduction to CHET, the Corpus of History English Texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Crespo, Begoña; Puente-Castelo, Luis and Monaco, Leida-Maria (eds.), Writing history in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel and Crespo, Begoña
2007 “Presenting the Coruña Corpus: A Collection of Samples for the Historical Study of English Scientific Writing”. In Pérez Guerra, Javier et al. (eds.), Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed: New Insights into Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang. 341–357.Google Scholar
2016 Classifying communicative formats in CHET, CECHeT and others. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 1: 308–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel; Lareo, Inés; Camiña, Gonzalo and Crespo, Begoña
(comps.) 2012 Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED. Oxford English Dictionary
Retrieved February 11, 2020, from [URL]
Puente-Castelo, Luis
2017 On conditionality: A corpus-based study of conditional structures in Late Modern English scientific texts. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Rees, Emma L. E.
2003 Margaret Cavendish: gender, genre, exile. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
UNESCO
1988 Proposed International Standard Nomenclature for Fields of Science and Technology. UNESCO/ROU257 rev. 1. Paris.Google Scholar
Watts, Ruth
2007 Women in Science: A Social and Cultural History. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whaley, Leigh Ann
2003 Women’s History as Scientists. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO, INC.Google Scholar