Chapter published in:
“All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts
Edited by Isabel Moskowich, Inés Lareo and Gonzalo Camiña
[Not in series 237] 2021
► pp. 190208
Works cited

Works cited

Allen, Bryce; Qin, Jian and Lancaster, Frederik Wilfrid
1994Persuasive Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of References in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 1665–1990. Social Studies of Science, 24/2: 279–310.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
2012 “An analysis of hedging in eighteenth century English astronomy texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel and Crespo, Begoña (eds.), Astronomy “playne and simple”. The Writing of Science between 1700 and 1900. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 199–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B.
1986 “Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: typologically regular assymetries”. In Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Johanna (eds.), Evidentiality and the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 273–312.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
1996The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25: 333–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsaglini-Castro, Anabella and Valcarce, Daniel
2020The Coruña Corpus Tool: Ten Years On. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 64: 13–19.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
1988Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward
1988Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Conrad, Susan
2009Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Johanna
1986Evidentiality and the linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie
2003‘This mystery …’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2/4: 313–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27/3: 495–518. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Susan and Biber, Douglas
1999 “Adverbial marking of Stance in speech and writing”. In Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff (eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 56–73.Google Scholar
Crespo, Begoña
2011Persuasion markers and ideology in eighteenth century Corpus of English Philosophy Texts (CEPhiT). Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 17: 199–228.Google Scholar
2021 “Linguistic indicators of persuasion in female authors in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Lareo, Inés and Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.), “All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 147–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, Peter
1997Hedging in academic writing: some theoretical aspects. English for Specific Purposes, 16: 271–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
1998Conditionals and Prediction: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas
2010A corpus-based examination of English if-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn.) London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya
1985Language, Context and Text. Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1993 “Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing”. In Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.), Register analysis. London: Pinter. 57–73.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff
1999Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1996Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17/4: 433–454. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20/3: 341–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2005Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
John, Suganthi
2013 “Identity Without the ‘I’: A Study of Citation Sequences and Writer Identity in Literature Review Sections of Dissertations”. In Tang, Ramona (ed.), Academic Writing in a Second or Foreign Language: Issues and Challenges Facing ESL/EFL academic writers. London: Continuum. 186–203.Google Scholar
Lareo, Inés; Monaco, Leida Maria; Esteve-Ramos, María José and Moskowich, Isabel
(comps.) 2020The Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts (CELiST). A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mele-Marrero, Margarita
2019 “Neither I nor we. Inexplicit authorial voice in eighteenth century academic texts”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Crespo, Begoña; Puente-Castelo, Luis and Monaco, Leida Maria (eds.), Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 215–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel
2016 “Pronouns as stance markers in the Coruña Corpus: an Analysis of the CETA, CEPhiT and CHET”. In Alonso-Almeida, Francisco (ed.), Stancetaking in Late Modern English Scientific Writing. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus. València: Universitat Politécnica de València. 73–91.Google Scholar
2021 “The making of CELiST, a bunch of disciplines”. In Moskowich, Isabel; Lareo, Inés and Camiña, Gonzalo (eds.), “All families and genera”: Exploring the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
1989The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10/1: 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parapar, Javier and Moskowich, Isabel
2007The Coruña Corpus Tool. Revista del Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural, 39: 289–290.Google Scholar
Puente-Castelo, Luis
2017On conditionality: A corpus-based study of conditional structures in Late Modern English scientific texts. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1994Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 11/2: 93–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1981 “Planes of Discourse”. In Rizvi, S. N. A. (ed.), The Two-Fold Voice: Essays in honour of Ramesh Mohan. Saltzburg: Universität Saltzburg. 70–89.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1996Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swales, John
1990Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Pahta, Päivi
1998Vernacularisation of medical writing in English: A corpus-based study of Scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine, 3/2: 157–185.Google Scholar
Tang, Ramona and John, Suganthi
1999The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18: S23–S39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Yiyun, Ye
1991Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics, 12/4: 365–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warchal, Krystyna
2010Moulding interpersonal relations through conditional clauses: Consensus-building strategies in written academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9: 140–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar