Part of
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politenessEdited by Marina Terkourafi
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 14] 2015
► pp. 41–70
Edited by Marina Terkourafi
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 14] 2015
► pp. 41–70
The M-word
A Greek collocation between solidarity and insult
We investigate the conventionalization of mock impoliteness through a study of the Greek collocation re malaka, which can be construed as either solidary (dude) or insulting (asshole). Questionnaire results showed that the solidary sense prevails across the board, in contrast to the insulting sense, about which consensus was much lower. We propose that, when the expression is used between young males in a close relationship, the Banter Principle (Leech 1983) is no longer in operation and no inference is needed to disambiguate the interactional import of the collocation. Rather, the solidary sense, having resulted from a “conventionalization of invited inferences” (Traugott 1999), is activated automatically in this “minimal context” (Terkourafi 2005). Our study has implications for the debates on the inherent nature of im/politeness and on the semantics/pragmatics interface from the perspective of im/politeness research.
References (49)
Allan, K. 2007. The pragmatics of connotation. Journal of Pragmatics 39(6): 1047–1057. 
Androutsopoulos, J. 2001. The language of youth. In Encyclopedic Guide to Language (in Greek), A.F. Christidis (ed.) ⟨[URL]⟩ (17 March 2012).
Asim, J. 2007. The N Word. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Bernal, M. 2008. Do insults always insult? Genuine impoliteness vs. Non-genuine impoliteness in colloquial Spanish. Pragmatics 18(4): 775–802.
Bianchi, C. 2014. Slurs and appropriation: An echoic account. Journal of Pragmatics 66 (5) 35–44.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. 1978/1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Cameron, P. 1969. Frequency and kinds of words in various social settings, or what the hell is going on? Pacific Sociological Review 12: 101–104.
Clark, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367.
. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP.
Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek, Center for the Greek Language, ⟨[URL]⟩
Eder, D. 1990. Serious and playful disputes: Variation in conflict talk among female adolescents. In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation, A. Grimshaw (ed.), 67–84. Cambridge: CUP.
Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.
Haugh, M. 2009. Designing a multimodal spoken component to the Australian National Corpus. In Selected Proceedings of the 2008 HSCNet Workshop on Designing the Australian National Corpus: Mustering Languages, M. Haugh, K. Burridge, J. Mulder & P. Peters (eds), 74–86. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. ⟨[URL]⟩
. 2010. When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 6(1): 7–31.
. 2011. Humour, face and im/politeness in getting acquainted. In Situated Politeness, B.L. Davies, M. Haugh & A.J. Merrison (eds). London: Continuum.
Haugh, M. & Bousfield, D. 2012. Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1099–1114.
Hay, J. 1994. Jocular abuse patterns in mixed-group interaction. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 26–55.
. 2002. Male cheerleaders and wanton women: Humour among New Zealand friends. TeReo (Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand) 45: 3–36.
Holmes, J. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2: 159–185.
Horn, L. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ‘84), D. Schiffrin (ed.), 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Karachaliou, R. & Archakis, A. 2012. The Greek particle re as a marker of unexpectedness: Evidence from the analysis of conversational narratives. In Studies in Greek Linguistics. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Thessaloniki: Institute for Modern Greek Studies.
Karamitsiou, A. 2005. Swearing language and gender: Male and female use of the word malakas among Greek University students. Paper presented at SociolinguistEssex X-2005, University of Essex, UK.
Kasper, G. 1990. Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 193–218.
Kiesling, S. 2004. Dude. American Speech 79(3): 281–305.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: OUP.
Labov W. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Levinson, S.C. 1995. Three levels of meaning. In Grammar and Meaning, F. Palmer (ed.), 90–115. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Loentz, E. 2006. Yiddish, kanak sprak, klezmer, and hip hop: Ethnolect, minority culture, multiculturalism, and stereotype in Germany. Shofar 25(1): 33–62.
McConnell-Ginet, S. 2003. ‘What’s in a name?’ Social labelling and gender practices. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds), 69–97. Oxford: Blackwell.
Slugoski, B.R. & Turnbull, W. 1988. Cruel to be kind and kind to be cruel: Sarcasm, banter and social relations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7(2): 101–121.
Sutton, L. 1995. Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Gender Articulated. Language and the Socially Constructed Self, K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (eds), 279–296. London: Routledge.
Terkourafi, M. 2003. Generalised and particularised implicatures of linguistic politeness. In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 114], P. Kühnlein, H. Rieser & H. Zeevat (eds), 149–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. Pragmatic correlates of frequency of use: The case for a notion of ‘minimal context’. In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, K. Nikiforidou, S. Marmaridou & E. Antonopoulou (eds), 209–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice [LPSP 21], D. Bousfield & M. Locher (eds), 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2009. On de-limiting context. In Contexts and Constructions [Constructional Approaches to Language 9], A. Bergs & G. Diewald (eds), 17–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012a. Politeness and pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, K. Jaszczolt & K. Allan (eds), 617–637. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2012b. Between pragmatics and sociolinguistics: Where does pragmatic variation fit in? In Pragmatic Variation in First and Second Language Contexts: Methodological Issues [IMPACT 31], C. Felix-Brasdefer & D. Koike (eds), 295–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E.C. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds), 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1999. The role of pragmatics in a theory of semantic change. In Pragmatics in 1998 Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. II, J. Verschueren (ed.), 93–102. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
. 2006. Semantic change: Bleaching, strengthening, narrowing, extension. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, K. Brown (ed.), 124–131. Oxford: Elsevier.
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Topics in English Linguistics: Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, K. Davidse, Vandelanotte, L. & Cuyckens, H. (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Trudgill, P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: CUP.
Vergis, N. & Terkourafi, M. 2014. The role of the speaker’s emotional state in im/politeness assessments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology.
Vergis, N. 2015. The Interplay of Pragmatic Inference, Face and Emotion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Vitsos, D. 2009. Ecce Malakas (Idhou o Malakas). Athens: Periplous Editions.
Watts, R. 1989. Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua 8(2–3): 131–66
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Dendenne, Boudjemaa
2023. “Shut up! Don’t say that! You’ve got to say ḤASHĀKEM!” The pragmatics of Ḥashāk and its variants in colloquial Algerian Arabic. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 145 ff. 
Vergis, Nikos
2023. How affect modulates conversational meanings: a review of experimental research: invited review. Cognition and Emotion ► pp. 1 ff.
Teneketzi, Korallia
2022. Impoliteness across social media platforms. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 38 ff.
Karachaliou, Rania & Argiris Archakis
Karachaliou, Rania & Argiris Archakis
2018. Chapter 2. Reactions to jab lines in conversational storytelling. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor [Topics in Humor Research, 7], ► pp. 29 ff.
Vergis, Nikos & Marina Terkourafi
2015. The Role of the Speaker’s Emotional State in Im/politeness Assessments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34:3 ► pp. 316 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.