Chapter published in:
Applied Linguistics in the Middle East and North Africa: Current practices and future directions
Edited by Atta Gebril
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 15] 2017
► pp. 185–202

Chapter 8
A Qatari case for authenticity in the investigation of reading abilities and strategies

This chapter argues that schools in the Middle East should incorporate “multilingual reading” tasks where conceptual knowledge is developed through integrating knowledge from sources in more than one language. Making a case for increased research on such tasks and the language use strategies that students employ when performing them, the chapter presents an assessment instrument developed as part of a nation-wide project aimed at improving Qatari middle-grade students’ science reading. To consider the instrument’s validity, a theoretical model of multilingual reading as well as the context and typical tasks where the ability might be used are discussed. This is followed by a description of the pilot instrument with an evaluation of its innovations and limitations.

Keywords: multilingual reading, science reading, situational model of reading, reading tasks, reading assessment, assessment instruments, reading strategies, Arabic, English, Qatar
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Multilingual reading ability
  • Test-takers and multilingual reading tasks in Qatar
  • Designing a multilingual reading assessment
    • Instrument
    • Administration
    • Evaluation of instrument
      • Response rates
      • Inferences about text models
      • Inferences about situational model
      • Inferences about strategy use
  • Conclusions and implications
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Published online: 18 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.15.08rey
References
Abbott, M. L.
(2006) ESL reading strategies: Differences in Arabic and Mandarin speaker test performance. Language Learning, 56(4), 633–670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S.
(2003) Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic-Hebrew-English-speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing, 16(7), 611–634. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Afflerbach, P.
(2011) Understanding and using reading assessment, K–12. Newark, DE: International Reading Assoc.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, P., Kapinus, B., Guthrie, J. T., Meter, P. V., & Mitchell, A.
(1994) Reading assessment: Performance assessments in reading and language arts. The Reading Teacher, 48(3), 266–271.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C., & Urquhart, A. H.
(Eds.) (1984) Reading in a foreign language: A reading problem or a language problem. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Alsheikh, N. O.
(2014) The perceived and actual use of metacognitive reading strategies by the UAE high school students. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(1), 140–153.Google Scholar
Alsheikh, N. O., & Mokhtari, K.
(2011) An examination of the metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 151–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. J.
(1991) Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F.
(1990) Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
(1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A.
(2010) Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L.
(1995) Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, D. J., Augustine, C. H., Zellman, G. L., Ryan, G. W., Goldman, C. A., Stasz, C., & Constant, L.
(2007) Education for a new era: Design and implementation of K-12 education reform in Qatar [Monograph No. RAND_MG548]. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://​www​.rand​.org​/pubs​/monographs​/MG548/
Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E.
(2008) The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 209–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chamot, A. U., Anstrom, K., Bartoshesky, A., Belanger, A., Delett, J., Karwan, V., Meloni, C., Kadah, R., & Keatley, C.
(2004) The elementary immersion learning strategies resource guide (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Capital Language Resource Center. Retrieved from http://​www​.nclrc​.org​/eils/
Clarke, M. A.
(1979) Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29(1), 121–150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L.
(2003) Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D.
(2011) Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Weaver, S. J.
(2006) Styles and strategies-based instruction: A teachers’ guide. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E.
(2007) Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J.
(1979) Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A.
(2012) Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enright, M., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Schedl, M.
(2000) TOEFL 2000 reading framework. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://​www​.ets​.org​/Media​/Research​/pdf​/RM​-00​-04​-Enright​.pdf
Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I.
(2010) Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 157–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, K. S.
(1970) Psycholinguistic universals in the reading process. Journal of Typographic Research, 4(2), 103–110.Google Scholar
Grabe, W.
(2008) Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
ICT Qatar
(2011) Qatar Digital Media Report 2011. Doha, Qatar: Supreme Council of Information & Communication Technology. Retrieved from http://​www​.ictqatar​.qa​/en​/documents​/document​/qatar​-digital​-media​-report​-2011
(2013) Qatar’s ICT Landscape 2013: Households and Individuals. Doha, Qatar: Supreme Council of Information & Communication Technology. Retrieved from http://​www​.ictqatar​.qa​/sites​/default​/files​/documents​/Qatar%20ICT%20Landscape​_EN​.pdf
(2014) Qatar’s ICT Landscape 2014: Households and Individuals. Retrieved from http://​www​.ictqatar​.qa​/en​/documents​/document​/qatars​-ict​-landscape​-2014​-households​-and​-individuals
Koda, K.
(2005) Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E., & Erler, L.
(2008) Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 90–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, D.
(2009) Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. System, 37(4), 640–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Changes in awareness of academic reading strategies among Arab medical students. Arab World English Journal, 3(2), 4–30.Google Scholar
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W.
(2007) Listen and learn: A systematic review of the evidence that podcasting supports learning in higher education. In C. McLoughlin & M. J. W. Lee (Eds.), (Vol. 2007; pp. 1669–1677). Presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. Retrieved from http://​www​.editlib​.org​/p​/25596/
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R.
(Eds.) (2007) Reading strategies of first- and second-language learners: See how they read pp. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.Google Scholar
Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R.
(2006) Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2, 265–286.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D.
(2015) Qatari middle school students’ perceptions of strategies for L1 and L2 reading. In C. Gitsaki & T. Alexiou (Eds.), Current trends in second/foreign language teaching and teacher education: Research perspectives (pp. 28–45). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Rupp, A. A., Ferne, T., & Choi, H.
(2006) How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: A cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23(4), 441–474. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J. H., & Bossers, B.
(1998) Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48(1), 71–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N.
(2000) Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Riggenbach & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 200–219). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
The Design-Based Research Collective
(2003) Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M.
(2004) Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 19–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Snellings, P., Simis, A., & Stevenson, M.
(2003) Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2 and L1 reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(1), 7–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., Stoel, R. D., de Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J.
(2007) Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 477–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zellman, G. L., Ryan, G. W., Karam, R., Constant, L., Salem, H., Gonzalez, G. C., Goldman, C. A., Al-Thani, H., & Al-Obaidli, K.
(2009) Implementation of the K-12 education reform in Qatar’s schools (No. RAND_MG880). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://​www​.rand​.org​/pubs​/monographs​/MG880/