Chapter 1
Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach
Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors
Article outline
- Motivation for the volume
- The organizing Research Network (ReN)
- Intended audience
- Structure of the volume
- Learner IDs (Chapters 2–6)
- Instructor IDs (Chapters 7–12)
- Other interlocutors (Chapter 13)
-
References
References
References
Adams, R., Nuevo, A., & Egi, T.
(
2011)
Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions? Modern Language Journal, 95(Suppl. 1), 42–63.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arabski, J., & Wojtaszek, A.
(
2011)
Individual learner differences in SLA. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S.
(
2015)
The psychology of the language learner revisited. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R., & He, X.
(
1999)
The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285–301.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A.
(
1994)
Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings.
Language Learning, 44(3), 449–491.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M.
(
2003)
Input and interaction. In
C. Doughty &
M. H. Long (Eds.),
The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
(
2015)
Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In
B. VanPatten &
J. Williams (Eds.),
Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 180–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A., & Pica, T.
(
1998)
The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition [Special issue].
Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 299–307.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(
2010)
Factors influencing oral corrective feedback provision in the Spanish foreign language classroom: Investigating instructor native/nonnative speaker status, SLA education, & teaching experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(
2013)
Instructor characteristics and classroom-based SLA of Spanish. In
K. L. Geeslin (Ed.),
The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 530–546). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(
2016a)
Factors influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback decisions.
Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 255–275.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(
2016b)
Spanish instructors’ operationalization and interpretation of task complexity and sequencing in non-experimental foreign language lessons.
The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 467–486.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(
2017)
L2 instructor individual characteristics. In
S. Loewen &
M. Sato (Eds.),
The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 451–467). New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hatch, E.
(
1978)
Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In
E. Hatch (Ed.),
Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 401–435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hatch, E.
(
1983)
Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, S.
(
2010)
The effectiveness of corrective feedback: A meta-analysis.
Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, S.
(
2013)
The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory.
Modern Language Journal, 97, 634–654.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. H.
(
1996)
The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In
W. C. Ritchie &
T. K. Bhatia (Eds.),
Handbook of research on second language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academy Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Long, M. H.
(
2007)
Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacIntyre, P. D., Burns, C., & Jessome, A.
(
2011)
Ambivalence about communicating in a second language: A qualitative study of French immersion students’ willingness to communicate.
Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 81–96.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A.
(
2006)
Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning.
Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A.
(Ed.) (
2007)
Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A.
(
2012)
Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P.
(
2010)
Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity.
Language Learning, 60, 501–533.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
(
2007)
Interaction in SLA: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. In
A. Mackey (Ed.),
Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J.
(
2003)
Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads.
Language Learning, 53, 35–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackey, A., & Polio, C.
(
2009)
Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass. New York, NY: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C.
(
2003)
Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates.
Language Learning, 53(1), 123–163.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonough, K.
(
2005)
Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moskovsky, C., Alrabai, F., Paolini, S., & Ratcheva, S.
(
2013)
The effects of teachers’ motivational strategies on learners’ motivation: A controlled investigation of second language acquisition.
Language Learning, 63(1), 34–62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pawlak, M.
(
2012)
New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pica, T.
(
1994)
Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493–527.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polio, C., Gass, S. M., & Chapin, L.
(
2006)
Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 237–267.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reynolds-Case, A.
(
2012)
Exploring how non-native teachers can use commonalties with students to teach the target language.
Hispania, 95(3), 523–537.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, L., & Meyer, A.
(Eds.) (
2012)
Individual differences in second language learning [Special issue].
Language Learning, 62(Suppl. 2), 1–4.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, R.
(
1990)
The role of consciousness in second language learning.
Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, R.
(
2001)
Attention. In
P. Robinson (Ed.),
Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sheen, Y.
(
2008)
Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning.
Language Learning, 58, 835–874.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sheen, Y.
(
2011)
Corrective feedback, individual differences, and second language learning. New York, NY: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swain, M.
(
1995)
Three functions of output in second language learning. In
G. Cook &
B. Seidlhofer (Eds.),
Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swain, M.
(
2005)
The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In
E. Hinkel (Ed.),
Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–484). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolff, C. E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P.
(
2014)
Keeping an eye on learning: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events.
Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 68–85.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.