References

(Studies with asterisks are included in this synthesis)

*Ahn, S. (2012) The relationships between grammatical sensitivity, noticing of recasts, and learning of Korean objective relative clauses through conversational interaction. Applied Language Learning, 22, 47–68.Google Scholar
Ammar, A., & Spada, N.
(2006) One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.
(2015) Working memory in second language learning. In Z. Wen, M. Mota, & A. McNeil (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 17–28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
*Baralt, M. (2010) Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S.
(1959) Modern Language Aptitude Test. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation/Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
*Chen, X. (2013) Chinese EFL learners’ noticing of recasts: Its relation to target structures, uptake, and working memory capacity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
*Dai, B. (2013) Individual differences in learners’ working memory, noticing of L2 forms in recasts, and their L2 development in task-based Interactions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1995) Uptake as language awareness. Language Awareness, 4, 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R.
(2005) Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9, 147–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Fujii, A. (2005) Individual differences in task performance: Aptitude profiles, orientation to form, and second language production in the EFL classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M.
(1997) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
*Goo, J. (2012) Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granena, G.
(2015) Cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning and information-processing styles: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 577–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015) The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Lado, B. (2008) The role of bilingualism, type of feedback, and cognitive capacity in the acquisition of non-primary languages: A computer-based study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
*Lai, C., Fei, F., & Roots, R. (2008) The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26, 70–90.Google Scholar
*Li, S. (2010) Corrective feedback in perspective: The interface between feedback type, proficiency, the choice of target structure, and learners’ individual differences in working memory and language analytic ability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
(2013a) Oral corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 68(2). 169–198.Google Scholar
(2013b) The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) The construct validity of language aptitude: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 801–342 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Cognitive differences in instructed second language acquisition. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.) Handbook of instructed second language learning (pp. 396–417). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Li, S., Shintani, N., & Ellis, R.
(2012) Doing meta-analysis in SLA: Practices, choices, and standards. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 384, 1–17.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., Smith, B. K., Bunting, M. F., & Doughty, C. J.
(2013) Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M.
(2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S., & Philp, J.
(2006) Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2004) Different effects of prompts and effects in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
(1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M.
(2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A.
(2006) Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010) Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60, 501–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J.
(1998) Conversational interaction and second language development: recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fuji, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002) Individual differences in working memory, noticing of feedback, and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Mackey, A., & Sachs, R. (2012) Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 62, 704–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2005) Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*McMullin, J. (1988) The effects of gender and the total physical response strategy on the retention of French commands by seventh-grade black students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
*Nagata, H., Aline, D., & Ellis, R. (1999) Modified input, language aptitude, and the acquisition of word meanings. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 133–149). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Payne, J., & Ross, B. (2005) Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9, 35–54.Google Scholar
*Payne, S., & Whitney, P. (2002) Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7–32.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F.
(2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Révész, A. (2012) Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2002) Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In P. Robinson (Ed.): Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 113–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Sachs, R. (2010) Individual differences and the effectiveness of visual feedback on reflexive binding in Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
*Sagarra, N. (2007) From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 230–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1994) Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Explicit and implicit learning of language (pp. 165–209). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
*Sheen, Y. (2007) The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–321). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P.
(2012) Language aptitude. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381–395). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2015) Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 367–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007) How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.): Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 171–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wen, Z.
(2015) Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In Z. Wen, B. Mailce, & A. McNeill (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing (pp. 41–62). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Winke, P.
(2005) Individual differences in adult Chinese second language acquisition: The relationships between aptitude, memory, and strategies for language learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Yalçın, Ş., Çeçen, S., & Erçetin, G.
(2016) The relationship between aptitude and working memory: an instructed SLA context. Language Awareness, 25, 144–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
*Yilmaz, Y. (2013) Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G.
(2016) The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 147–161.Google Scholar
*Zhao, Y. (2015) The effects of explicit and implicit recasts on the acquisition of two grammatical structures and the mediating role of working memory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Chalmers, James, Susana A. Eisenchlas, Andrew Munro & Andrea C. Schalley
2021. Sixty years of second language aptitude research: A systematic quantitative literature review. Language and Linguistics Compass 15:11 DOI logo
Fu, Mengxia & Shaofeng Li
Fu, Mengxia & Shaofeng Li
Jiang, Ci, Fang Liu, Yifei Gong, Yi Cao & Jianlin Chen
2023. How do Chinese-English Bilinguals and Tibetan-Chinese-English Trilinguals Differ in Explicit and Implicit Aptitude?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:3  pp. 869 ff. DOI logo
Li, Shaofeng
2018. Chapter 2. Data collection in the research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback. In Critical Reflections on Data in Second Language Acquisition [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 51],  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Pawlak, Miroslaw
2020. Chapter 3. The effect of proficiency, gender, and learning style on the occurrence of negotiated interaction in communicative task performance. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53],  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz, Simón, Patrick Rebuschat & Detmar Meurers
2021. The effects of working memory and declarative memory on instructed second language vocabulary learning: Insights from intelligent CALL. Language Teaching Research 25:4  pp. 510 ff. DOI logo
TEIMOURI, YASSER, FARHAD TABANDEH & SOMAYEH TAHMOURESI
2022. The Hare and the Tortoise: The Race on the Course of L2 Learning. The Modern Language Journal 106:4  pp. 764 ff. DOI logo
Torres, Julio
2023. Exploring working memory and language dominance in heritage bilinguals’ writing processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:3  pp. 710 ff. DOI logo
Wen, Zhisheng (Edward) & Peter Skehan
2021. Stages of Acquisition and the P/E Model of Working Memory: Complementary or contrasting approaches to foreign language aptitude?. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 41  pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Mingfei & Simin Zeng
2023. Optimal timing of treatment for errors in second language learning – A systematic review of corrective feedback timing. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.