Cover not available
Part of
Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 16] 2017
► pp. 225–253

Chapter 10
Linguistic variation in instructor provision of oral input

 | Indiana University
 | Indiana University
 | Texas Tech University
 | Indiana University
The current study examines the variable use of verbal subjects (e.g., explicit yo hablo vs. null hablo ‘[I] speak’), in oral production by five native-speaking instructors directed to Spanish foreign language (FL) learners in a university setting. Our data consisted of instructors’ oral presentation of grammar-focused tasks in one to three Spanish FL lessons. Results demonstrate individual differences in patterns of use by instructor, and are interpreted in the context of learners’ acquisition of subject expression (e.g., Abreu, 2009; Geeslin, 2011a, 2011b; Geeslin, Linford, & Fafulas, 2015; Geeslin, Linford, Fafulas, Long, & Díaz-Campos, 2012) and patterns of variable use by native speakers across out-of-classroom settings and tasks (e.g., Abreu, 2009; Geeslin, 2006; Geeslin & Gudmestad, 2008a, 2008b). An exploration of individual characteristics such as country of origin (i.e., regional dialect), age of learning of English, years in the United States, and years teaching Spanish provides further evidence of the complex nature of this phenomenon. Future areas of investigation of instructor classroom input, particularly in relation to learner opportunities for use and development of variable structures, are outlined.
Keywords: FL classroom, input, instructors, Spanish subject expression, variable structure
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background
    • The role of input in second language (L2) development
    • Instructor oral input in the classroom: Factors affecting variability
    • Subject expression in Spanish: A test case for instructor-produced input
    • The L2 acquisition of subject expression
    • The present study
    • Method
      • Participants
    • Procedure
    • Coding and analysis
  • Results
    • Group findings
    • Findings by individual instructor
  • Discussion
    • Research question 3: Distribution of subject forms
    • Research question 4: Linguistic factors influencing individual use
  • Conclusions and future directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.16.10gur
References (80)
References
Abreu, L. (2009). Spanish Subject Personal Pronoun Use by Monolinguals, Bilinguals and Second Language Learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
(2012). Subject pronoun expression and priming effects among bilingual speakers of Puerto Rican Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin & M. Díaz Campos (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 1–8). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Barcroft, J. (2003). Effects of questions about word meaning during L2 Spanish lexical learning. Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 546–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., & Langman, J. (2004). Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42(4), 303–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R., & Pease-Alvarez, L. (1997). Null pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s narrative discourse. Language Variation and Change, 9(3), 349–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. (1994). Switch reference, verb class, and priming in a variable syntax. In K. Beals (Ed.), Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on variation in linguistic theory, 30, 27–45.Google Scholar
Cameron, R., & Flores-Ferrán, N. (2004). Perseveration of subject expression across regional dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 1(1), 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., & Child, M. (2011). Subject pronoun expression in a variety of Spanish in contact with Portuguese. In J. Michnowicz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 14–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., & Shin, N. (2015). Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1–4), 161–170.Google Scholar
Cots, J. M., & Díaz, J. P. (2005). Constructing social relationships and linguistic knowledge through non-native-speaking teacher talk. In E. Llurda (Ed.), Non-native language teachers: Perceptions, challenges and contributions to the profession (pp. 107–28). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2011). Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system (Vol. 3). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Enríquez, E. V. (1984). El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Editorial CSIC-CSIC Press.Google Scholar
Erker, D., & Guy, G. R. (2012). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language, 88(3), 526–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, N. (2004). Spanish subject personal pronoun use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can we rest the case of English contact? Language Variation and Change, 16(1), 49–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaies, S. J. (1979). Linguistic input in first and second language learning. In F. R. Eckman & A. J. Hasting (Eds.), Studies in first and second language acquisition (pp. 185–193). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gámez, P. B., & Levine, S. C. (2013). Oral language skills of Spanish-speaking English language learners: The impact of high-quality native language exposure. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(04), 673–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2015). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 180–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. (2006). Linguistic contextual features and variation in L2 data elicitation. In C. Klee & T. Face (Eds.), Selected Proceedings from the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as a First and Second Language (pp. 74–85). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2011a). The acquisition of variation in second language Spanish: How to identify and catch a moving target. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics (pp. 303–320). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b). Variation in L2 Spanish: The state of the discipline. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 4(2), 461–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L. & Gudmestad, A. (2008a). Comparing interview and written elicitation tasks in native and non-native use: Do speakers do what we think they do? In J. Bruhn de Garavito & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, (pp. 64–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2008b). Variable subject expression in second-language Spanish: A comparison of native and non-native speakers. In M. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.) Selected Proceedings of the Second Language Research Forum, (pp. 69–85). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Using sociolinguistic analyses of discourse-level features to expand research on L2 variation in forms of Spanish subject expression. In L. Plonsky & M. Schierloh (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2009 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 16–30). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Linford, B., & Fafulas, S. (2015). Variable subject expression in second language Spanish. In A. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A Cross-dialectal perspective (pp. 191–210). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Linford, B., Fafulas, S., Long, A., & Díaz-Campos, M. (2012). The L2 development of subject form variation in Spanish: The individual vs. the group. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 156–174). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y. (2014). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016a). Factors influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback decisions. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 255–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b). Spanish instructors’ operationalization and interpretation of task complexity and sequencing in non-experimental foreign language lessons. The Language Learning Journal 44(4), 467–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Geeslin, K. L., Daidone, D., Linford, B., Long, A. Y., Michalski, I., & Solon, M. (2018). Examining multifaceted sources of input: Variationist and usage-based approaches to understanding the L2 Classroom. In A. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy (pp. 293–313). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hamayan, E. V., & Tucker, G. R. (1980). Language input in the bilingual classroom and its relationship to second language achievement. TESOL Quarterly, 14(4), 453–468.Google Scholar
Hancin-Bhatt, B. (2008). Second language phonology in optimality theory. In J. G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 117–146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernández, T. A. (2011). Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 159–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, J. G. (1986). Functional compensation for/s/deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language, 62(3), 609–621. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knaus, V., & Nadasdi, T. (2001). Etre ou ne pas être in immersion French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. E. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning, 26(1), 125–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2009). Input enhancement in the classroom. Hispania, 92(2), 300–326.Google Scholar
Linford, B., & Shin, N. L. (2013). Lexical frequency effects on L2 Spanish subject pronoun expression. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, G. Lord, A. de Prada Pérez, & J. E. Aaron (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 175–189). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academy Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 379, 259–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123–123). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lubbers Quesada, M. (2015). The L2 acquisition of Spanish subjects: Multiple perspectives (Vol. 50). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E. (2001). Analysing student teachers’ codeswitching in foreign language classrooms: Theories and decision making. Modern Language Journal, 85(4), 531–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E., & Tian, L. (2015). Exploring teachers’ oral explanations of new English lexical items in a Chinese university: Comparisons with dictionary information. System, 52, 78–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., & Rehner, K. (2001). Variation in the spoken French of Ontario French immersion students: The case of juste vs. seulement vs. rien que. Modern Language Journal, 85(3), 398–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F. (2004). From data to theory: The over-representation of linguistic knowledge in SLA. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 139–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nadasdi, T. (2001). Agreeing to disagree: Variable subject-verb agreement in immersion French. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 79–101.Google Scholar
Nadasdi, T., Mougeon, R., & Rehner, K. (2001). The marking of future time in the spoken French of immersion students. Unpublished manuscript, University of Alberta, Canada. Cited in Rehner et al., (2003).Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A. C. (2012). Spanish in New York. Language contact, dialectal leveling, and structural continuity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philp, J., & Tognini, R. (2009). Language acquisition in foreign language contexts and the differential benefits of interaction. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 245–266.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 52–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quesada, M. L., & Blackwell, S. E. (2009). The L2 acquisition of null and overt Spanish subject pronouns: A pragmatic approach. In J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford, & F. M. Martín (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 117–130). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ranson, D. L. (1991). Person marking in the wake of /s/ deletion in Andalusian Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 3, 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regan, V. (2004). The relationship between the group and the individual and the acquisition of native speaker variation patterns: A preliminary study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 42(4), 335–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehner, K. (1998). Variation in the spoken French of grade 9 and 12 students from extended French programmes in the Greater Toronto area: Negative particle NE, expressions of restriction, and markers of consequence (Unpublished master’s thesis). York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
Rehner, K., & Mougeon, R. (1999). Variation in the spoken French of immersion students: To ne or not to ne, that is the sociolinguistic question. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(1), 124–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rehner, K., Mougeon, R., & Nadasdi, T. (2001, October). Expressing the notion of consequence in immersion French. Paper presented at the 30th annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, Raleigh, NC.
(2003). The learning of sociolinguistic variation by advanced FSL learners: The case of nous versus on in immersion French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 127–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Abbuhl, R. (2013). Optimizing the noticing of recasts via computer‐delivered feedback: Evidence that oral input enhancement and working memory help second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 196–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. W. (2004). Investigating variation and change in written documents. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 67–96). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, N. L., & Otheguy, R. (2009). Diminishing sensitivity to continuity of reference: Subject pronoun use in New York City. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana & Vervuert.Google Scholar
Shin, J. E., & Kellogg, D. (2007). The novice, the native, and the nature of language teacher expertise. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solon, M., Long, A. Y., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2017). Task complexity, language-related episodes, and production of L2 Spanish vowels. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. E. (2010). Testing convergence via code-switching: Priming and the structure of variable subject expression. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(3), 1–27.Google Scholar
(2011). Using structural variability to evaluate convergence via code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(3), 241–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. E. (2007). Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19(2), 101–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, C. E., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2012). What do subject pronouns do in discourse? Cognitive, mechanical and constructional factors in variation. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(4), 711–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., Cardoso, W., White, J., & Horst, M. (2012). A frequency‐based approach to L2 phonological learning: Teacher input and student output in an intensive ESL context. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 176–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (2015). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, L. (1990). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(2), 121–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. C. C. (2010). Recasts in the EFL classroom: A comparison of native and nonnative teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, Austin. Google Scholar
Zyzik, E. (2017). Subject expression in L2 Spanish: Convergence of generative and usage-based perspectives? Second Language Research, 33(1), 33–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura, Lara Bryfonski & Derek Reagan
2024. Teacher IDs and task adaptations. In Individual Differences and Task-Based Language Teaching [Task-Based Language Teaching, 16], ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Stephen Fafulas
2022. Linguistic variation and second language Spanish. In Variation in Second and Heritage Languages [Studies in Language Variation, 28], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2020. Variationist perspective(s) on interlocutor individual differences. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and Their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2021. Sophisticated language use in context. In Advancedness in Second Language Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 31], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L.
2021. Sociolinguistic Competence in Second Languages. In Research Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics [Springer Texts in Education, ], ► pp. 879 ff. DOI logo
Geeslin, Kimberly L. & Travis Evans-Sago
2020. Bilingualism, second language acquisition, and language contact. In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura
2020. Synthesizing cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and Their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Long, Avizia Y. & Kimberly L. Geeslin
2020. Examining the role of instructor first language in classroom-based oral input. In Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and Their Individual Differences [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 53], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.