References

References

Ames, C.
(1992) Classrooms: Goal, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borg, S.
(2003) Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers, think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43, 391–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borg, S., & Liu, Y.
(2013) Chinese college English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 270–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, D. M., Holten, C. A., Goodwin, J. M.
(1993) Responding to dialogue journals in teacher preparation: What’s effective? TESOL Journal, 2, 15–19.Google Scholar
Coughlan, P., & Duff, P.
(1994) Same task, different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173–194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cumming, A.
(2006) Introduction, purpose, and conceptual foundations. In A. Cumming (Ed.), Goals for academic writing: ESL students and their instructors (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Tseng, W. T.
(2009) Motivational processing in interactional tasks in: A. Mackey & C. Polio, (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 117–134). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E.
(1998) Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
(2006) Input, interaction and output: An overview. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (Eds.). AILA Review, 19 (pp. 3–17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2015) Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams, (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 180–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A.
(2017) Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L.
(2011) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 61 s1, 189–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, J.
(1990) Models of supervision: choices. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 156–166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Révész, A.
(2012) Tasks, teacher feedback, and learner modified output in naturally occurring classroom interaction. Language Learning, 62, 851–879. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
He, T.
(2005) Effects of mastery and performance goals on the composition strategy use of adult EFL writers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 407–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S.
(2002) Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M.
(2000) Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S.
(1999) Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421–452. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, Y., & Izumi, S.
(2004) Investigating the effects of oral output on the learning of relative clauses in English: Issues in the psycholinguistic requirements for effective output tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 587–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. E.
(1992) Learning to teach: Instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 507–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 765–770. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., Wa-Mbalaka, S.
(2006) Investigating the empirical link between interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, M.
(2005) Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D.
(2000) Multiple-site practicum: Opportunities for diverse learning and teaching experiences. TESOL Journal, 9, 18–21.Google Scholar
Loucks-Horsley, S.
(1996) Professional development for science education. In R. W. Bybee, (Ed.), National standards and the science curriculum (pp. 83–90). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
(2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Polio, C., & McDonough, K.
(2004) The relationship between experience, education, and teachers’ use of incidental focus-on-form techniques. Language Teaching Research, 8, 301–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. M.
(2012) Interactionist approaches. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2005) Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. Modern Language Journal, 90, 33–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A.
(2006) Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 31–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moersch, C.
(1995) Level of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 22, 40–42.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H.
(2006) Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 31–65 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muranoi, H.
(2007) Output practice in the L2 classroom. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 51–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J.
(2003) Task-based learning: The interaction between tasks and learner. ELT Journal, 57, 352–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musumeci, D.
(1996) Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross purposes. Applied Linguistics, 17, 286–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Numrich, C.
(1996) On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 131–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, M.
(1995) The teacher change cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 705–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pica, T.
(2002) Subject matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C., Gass, S. M., & Chapin, L.
(2006) Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 237–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosaen, C., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., Terpstra, M.
(2008) Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 347–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M., & Oteíza, T.
(2004) The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 67–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input and second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing are not enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158–164.Google Scholar
(2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Uggen, M.
(2012) Re-investigating the noticing function of output. Language Learning, 62, 506–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K.
(2006) Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, C., & Harvey, J.
(2010) Raising teachers’ awareness about corrective feedback through research replication. Language Teaching Research, 14, 421–443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J.
(2004) Perspectives on task-based instruction: Understanding our practices, acknowledging different practitioners. In B. Leaver & J. Willis (Eds.), Task-based instruction in foreign language education (pp. 3–46). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Zyzik, E., & Polio, C.
(2008) Incidental focus on form in university Spanish literature classes. Modern Language Journal, 92, 53–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar