Chapter published in:
Speaking in a Second Language
Edited by Rosa Alonso Alonso
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 17] 2018
► pp. 105125


Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T.
(1989) Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 17–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
(2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bulté, B.
(2013) The development of complexity in second language acquisition: A dynamic systems approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Brussels.Google Scholar
Caspi, T.
(2010) A dynamic perspective on second language development. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Chan, H.
(2015) A dynamic approach to the development of lexicon and syntax in a second language. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Chan, H., Verspoor, M., & Vahtrick, L.
(2015) Dynamic development in speaking versus writing in identical twins. Language Learning, 65(2), 298–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S., Harlaar, N., Haworth, C. M., & Plomin, R.
(2010) Two by two: A twin study of second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 21(5), 635–640.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dykstra-Pruim, P.
(2003) Speaking, writing, and explicit-rule knowledge: Toward an understanding of how they interrelate. TT –Foreign Language Annals TA -, 36(1), 66–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J.
(1995) Language as a dynamical system. In T. van Gelder (Ed.), Mind in motion: Explorations of the dynamics of cognition (pp. 195–225). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F.
(2010) Bilingual life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayiou-Thomas, M. E.
(2008) Genetic and environmental influences on early speech, language and literacy development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 397–408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U.
(2002) A dynamic model of multilingualism. Perspective of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2004) PopTools Version 2.6.2. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO. Retrieved from http://​www​.cse​.csiro​.au​/poptoolsGoogle Scholar
Hosenfeld, B., Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Van den Boom, D. C.
(1997) Indicators of discontinuous change in the development of analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 367–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, K. W.
(1970) Do sentences in the second language grow like those in the first? TESOL Quarterly, 4, 195–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(1997) Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition,. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. Retrieved from http://​www​.scopus​.com​/inward​/record​.url​?eid​=2​-s2​.0​-0040151244​&partnerID​=40​&md5​=68465fc5cd8f0bc3db4bf803ce3ce4ce
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A.
(2002) Macro- and microdevelopmental research: assumptions, research strategies, constraints, and utilities. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 243–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lowie, W.
(2013) The CEFR and the dynamics of second language learning: Trends and challenges. Language Learning in Higher Education, 2(1), 17–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowie, W., Van Dijk, M., Chan, H. P., & Verspoor, M. H.
(2017) Finding the key to successful L2 learning in groups and individuals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching.7(1), 127–148. Google Scholar
Lowie, W., Van Dijk, M., Chan, H., & Verspoor, M.
(2017b) Finding the key to successful L2 learning in groups and individuals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 771(7), 127–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, X.
(2012) The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A.
(1999) Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macwhinney, B.
(2005) The emergence of linguistic form in time. Connection Science, 17, 191–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Durán, P.
(2004) Lexical diversity and language development. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
North, B.
(2007) The CEFR illustrative descriptor scales. Modern Language Journal, 91, 656–659.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penris, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2017) Academic writing development: A complex, dynamic process. In S. E. Pfenninger & J. Navracsics (Eds.), Future research directions for applied linguistics (pp. 215–242). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development. Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pine, K. J., Lufkin, N., Kirk, E., & Messer, D.
(2007) A microgenetic analysis of the relationship between speech and gesture in children: Evidence for semantic and temporal asynchrony. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(2), 234–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Port, R., & van Gelder, T.
(1995) Mind as motion: Exploration in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.
(2010) Dynamic patterns in the development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study on the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 532–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stromswold, K.
(2001) The heritability of language: A review and metaanalysis of twin, adoption, and linkage studies. Language, 77(4), 674–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Why aren’t identical twins identical? Genetic, prenatal and postnatal factors. Cognition, 101, 333–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B.
(1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M. H., & Lowie, W.
(2011) Variability and DST. In M. Verspoor, K. De Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P.
(1998) A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond. Psychological Review, 5, 634–677.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental Psychology (pp. 640–672). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M.
(2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X.
(2012) A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 239–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., & Van Dijk, M.
(2013) Variability in a dynamic systems approach. In C. A. Chapelle, The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 2051–6059). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, N.
(2012) The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 576–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Hae-Young, K., & Inagaki, S.
(1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Wu, J. R. W.
(2012) GEPT and English language teaching and testing in Taiwan. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(1), 11–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yip, V., & Matthews, S.
(2007) The bilingual child: Early development and language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://​www​.cambridge​.org​/catalogue​/catalogue​.asp​?isbn​=9780521544764CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Chang, Pengyun & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2021. A CDST Perspective on Variability in Foreign Language Learners’ Listening Development. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Jong, Nivja H.
2020.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
van Batenburg, Eline, Ron Oostdam, Amos van Gelderen, Ruben Fukkink & Nivja de Jong
2020. The effects of instructional focus and task type on pre-vocational learners’ ability in EFL oral interaction. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 171:2  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Yu & Shoucun Tao
2020.  In Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 54],  pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.