Chapter published in:
Speaking in a Second Language
Edited by Rosa Alonso Alonso
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 17] 2018
► pp. 225240
Asher, J. J.
(1966) The learning strategy of the Total Physical Response: A review. Modern Language Journal, 50, 79–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist (Ed.), transl. by C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beckner, C., Ellis, N. C., Blythe, R., Holland, J., Bybee, J., Ke, J., Christiansen, M.H. Larsen-Freeman, D. Croft, W. Schoenemann, T.
(2009) Language is a complex adaptative system. Language Learning, 59, 12: 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlitz, M. D.
(1898) The Berlitz Method for Teaching Modern Languages, English Part. 1st book (10th ed. revised). Berlin: Cronbach.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
(2013) Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
(2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35, 243–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T.
(2007) Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning and Technology, 11(3), 38–63.Google Scholar
Collins, L.
(2013) Form-focused instruction. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Cook, V
(1999) Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. Tesol Quarterly 33(2), 185–209 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V.
(2003) Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Multi-competence and nativeness and language pedagogy. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Transfer and the relationship between the languages of multi-competence. In R. Alonso Alonso (ed.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp. 24–37). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., & Cadierno, T.
(2009) Constructing a second language: Introduction to the special edition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 111–139 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C.
(2013) Second language acquisition. In G. Trousdale & T. Hoffmann (Eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 365–378), Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(2016) Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, first published on February 11 2016. doi: Crossref.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S.W.
(2008) Constructing a second language inventory-the accumulation of linguistic resources in L2 English. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. & Cadierno, T.
(2015) Usage-based perspectives on second language learning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. & Theodórsdóttir, G.
(2015) Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 38(2),1–23.Google Scholar
European Commission
Gattegno, C.
(1972) Teaching foreign languages in schools: The silent way. New York, NY: Educational SolutionsGoogle Scholar
Gettys, S.
2017). Teaching students to talk a foreign language: Usage-based instruction. Wilmington, DE: Vernon Press.
Gouin, F.
(1880) Essai sur une réforme des méthodes d’enseignement. Exposé d’une nouvelle méthode linguistique. L’art d’enseigner et d’étudier les langues. Paris: FischbacherGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
(2011) L2 interactional competence and development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornby, A. S.
(1950) The situational approach in language teaching. ELT Journal, 4–6: 4(4): 98–103; 4(5): 121–28; 4(6): 150–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R., & Smith, R.
(2014).The history of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, from a British and European perspective. Language and History, 57(2), 75–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kannellow, V.
(2009) The practice of pronunciation teaching in current ELT manuals and handbook: A review. Speak Out: IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Newsletter, 40, 1–5.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J.
(2011) A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142) New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E.
(Eds.) (2008) Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2011) A complexity approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M.
(1993) The lexical approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Lindstromberg, S., & Boers, F.
(2005) From movement to metaphor with manner-of-movement verbs. Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 241–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowie, W.
(2013) Dynamic systems theory approaches to second language acquisition. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1806–1813). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M.J.
( 2008) Uncovering CLIL. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McNeill, D.
(2012) How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, C.
(2014) Intelligible accented speakers as pronunciation models. In J. Levis & S. McCrocklin (Eds), Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching (PSLLT), (pp. 172–176). Ames, IA: Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(2011) Research timeline: Accent and intelligibility in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 43(3), 316–327 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J. M.
(2014) Intelligible, comprehensible, non-native models in ESL/EFL pronunciation teaching. System, 42, 258–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, P.
(1990) Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J.
(1980) A lexical phrase grammar for ESL.Tesol Quarterly, 14, 337–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S.
(1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Negueruela E.
(2003) A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2013) SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and thebi/multilingual turn. Currents in Language Learning, 63(Supplement 1) .Google Scholar
(2014) Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May, The multilingual turn. Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 32–53). London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
(2015a) Inroads of multicompetence into the mainstream of SLA. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Usage-based SLA: A research habitus whose time has come. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-Based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 353–374). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: A review studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3),193–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sauveur, L.
(1874) Causeries avec mes élèves. Boston, MA: Schönhof and Möller.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH
(1996) Preliminary recommendations on corpus typology. EAGLES Document TCWG-CTYP/P http://​www​.ilc​.cnr​.it​/EAGLES​/corpustyp​/corpustyp​.html.
Skinner, B. F.
(1957) Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(2000) The output hypothesis and beyond. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
The Douglas Fir Group
(2016) A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 19–47 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A.
(2015) Interaction and second language development: A Vygotskian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., & Kinginger, C.
(2013) Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research, 17, 282–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.
(Eds.) (2009) Task-based language teaching. A reader. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M.
(2017) Complex Dynamic Systems theory and L2 pedagogy: Lessons to be learned. In A. E., Tyler, L., Ortega, & M. Uno (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. (pp. 143–162) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.
(1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, J.
(2015), Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.) Usage-Based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–104) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V.
(1994) The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 202–208.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D.
(1976) Notional Syllabuses:A Taxonomy and its Relevance to Foreign Language Curriculum Development. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar