The use of I and we in research writing has been acknowledged as one of the most
powerful means to mark author stance, however there are substantial differences in personal pronoun preferences
depending on the disciplinary and cultural background of the writer. This chapter investigates the use of personal
pronouns in linguistic research articles written by Lithuanian scholars in English and in Lithuanian, and by British English speakers in English. The results suggest that most Lithuanian scholars choose a more explicit author
stance expression when they write in English, even though the frequencies and some functions of I and
we in the English speakers’ texts tend to be different from those in the Lithuanian
and promotion across languages. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 2, 343–357.
Swales, J. M.
as Tyrannosaurus rex. World
Englishes, 16(3), 373–382.
(2014) Lietuviškojo humanitarinių ir socialinių mokslų diskurso ypatybės: Mokslo
studija [Insights into Lithuanian scientific discourse of the
Humanities and Social
Sciences]. Vilnius: VU leidykla.
Tang, R., & John, S.
‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person
pronoun. English for Specific
Purposes, 18, S23–S39.
in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience
(ms). [Electronic dissertation]. University of Tampere, Finland.
am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French,
Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 8(2), 163–190.
suggest that we need more research’. Personal reference in linguistics journal
articles. In C. Gabrielatos, R. Slessor, & J. W. Unger (Eds.), Papers
from the Lancaster University postgraduate conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching. Volume 1. Papers
from LAEL PG
2006 (pp. 139–157). Lancaster: Department of Linguistics and English Language Lancaster University.
or ‘telling’? The issue of cultural variation in research
genres. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic
discourse (pp. 216–232). Harlow: Longman.
Cited by 7 other publications
2023. Rhetorical structure and linguistic features of research article abstracts in the humanities: the case of Lithuanian, English, and Russian. Taikomoji kalbotyra :19 ► pp. 33 ff.
Hůlková, Irena, Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova, Renata Jančaříková & Josef Schmied
2019. Intercultural variation in academic discourse: Theme zones and the build-up of coherence in research articles. Topics in Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 33 ff.
Jürine, Anni, Djuddah Leijen, Helen Hint, Jolanta Sinkuniene, Diāna Laiveniece, Christer Johansson & Nicholas Groom
2021. Academic Writing in the Baltic States. Educare :1 ► pp. 27 ff.
2023. Speaker stance and engagement across disciplines in Lithuanian university lectures: the case of mes ‘we’ in medicine and business administration. Taikomoji kalbotyra :19 ► pp. 14 ff.
2021. Self-mention in the academic discourse of ELF writers. Topics in Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 32 ff.
Ruskan, Anna, Helen Hint, Djuddah Arthur Joost Leijen & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2023. Lithuanian academic discourse revisited: Features and patterns of scientific communication. Open Linguistics 9:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.