Chapter published in:
Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing
Edited by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 18] 2018
► pp. 5980
References

References

Bennett, K.
(2007) Epistemicide! The tale of a predatory discourse. The Translator, 13(2), 151–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Duszak, A.
(1997) Introduction. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 1–8). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fløttum, K., Dahl, T., & Kinn, T.
(2006) Academic voices: Across languages and disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gotti, M.
(Ed.) (2009) Commonality and individuality in academic discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Harwood, N.
(2005) ‘We do not seem to have a theory … The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Political scientists on the functions of personal pronouns in their writing: An interview-based study of ‘I’ and ‘we’. Text & Talk, 27(1), 27–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1998) Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Bondi, M.
(Eds.) (2006) Academic discourse across disciplines. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Diani, G.
(Eds.) (2009) Academic evaluation: Review genres in university settings. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Sancho Guinda, C.
(Eds) (2012) Stance and voice in written academic genres. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R.
(2011a) The construction of the author’s voice in academic writing: The interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors. Text & Talk, 31(2) 173–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011b) The study of authorial voice: Using a Spanish–English corpus to explore linguistic transference. Corpora, 6(1), 1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Lafuente Millán, E.
(Eds.) (2010) Constructing interpersonality: Multiple perspectives on written academic genres. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Molino, A.
(2010) Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive study of English and Italian linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 86–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P.
(2007) ‘I/we focus on…’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 143–162.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P., & Šinkūnienė, J.
(2016) Self-reference in research articles across Europe and Asia: A review of studies. Brno Studies in English, 42(1), 71–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sala, M.
(2008) Argumentative styles as cultural identity traits in legal studies. Linguistica e Filologia 27, 93–113.Google Scholar
Sanderson, T.
(2008) Interaction, identity and culture in academic writing: The case of German, British and American academics in the humanities. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen (Eds.), Corpora and discourse: The challenges of different settings (pp. 57–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
(2008) WordSmith Tools (version 5). Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Shaw, P.
(2003) Evaluation and promotion across languages. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 343–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M.
(1997) English as Tyrannosaurus rex . World Englishes, 16(3), 373–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Šinkūnienė, J.
(2014) Lietuviškojo humanitarinių ir socialinių mokslų diskurso ypatybės: Mokslo studija [Insights into Lithuanian scientific discourse of the Humanities and Social Sciences]. Vilnius: VU leidykla.Google Scholar
Tang, R., & John, S.
(1999) The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S23–S39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varttala, T.
(2001) Hedging in scientifically oriented discourse: Exploring variation according to discipline and intended audience (ms). [Electronic dissertation]. University of Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
Vassileva, I.
(1998) Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vladimirou, D.
(2007) ‘I suggest that we need more research’. Personal reference in linguistics journal articles. In C. Gabrielatos, R. Slessor, & J. W. Unger (Eds.), Papers from the Lancaster University postgraduate conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching. Volume 1. Papers from LAEL PG 2006 (pp. 139–157). Lancaster: Department of Linguistics and English Language Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Yakhontova, T.
(2002) ‘Selling’ or ‘telling’? The issue of cultural variation in research genres. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 216–232). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hůlková, Irena, Olga Dontcheva-Navratilova, Renata Jančaříková & Josef Schmied
2019. Intercultural variation in academic discourse: Theme zones and the build-up of coherence in research articles. Topics in Linguistics 20:2  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Murillo, Silvia
2018.  In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.