Cover not available
Part of
English Pronunciation Instruction: Research-based insights
Edited by Anastazija Kirkova-Naskova, Alice Henderson and Jonás Fouz-González
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 19] 2021
► pp. 197–222

Chapter 9
Rationale and design of a study of foreign-accented academic English

| Grenoble Alpes University
| Grenoble Alpes University

This chapter explores the intersection of English Medium Instruction (EMI) and Foreign-Accented Speech (FAS), particularly in French higher education, while outlining the developmental phases of the nascent IP-CAFES research project. Pertinent research into cognitive load, accentedness, and prosody is summarised before we describe the creation of a specialised corpus and an experimental protocol using content from that corpus. Pedagogical implications are also addressed, for both speaker and listener training.

Keywords: accent perception tests, comprehensibility, English Medium Instruction, foreign-accented speech, interphonology, prosody, suprasegmental features
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Context
    • European EMI: Speakers and listeners
    • Complex learning, cognitive load, and accentedness
    • Prosody and comprehensibility
    • Language transfer and its impact
  • IP-CAFES project
    • Research questions and hypotheses
    • Collecting the corpus recordings
    • Selecting and creating the stimuli
    • Creating and administering the perception tests
    • Using qualitative and quantitative data
  • Pedagogical implications
    • Course content and format
    • Speaker training
    • Listener training
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.19.09fro
References
Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K.
(1992) The relationship between native speaker judgments of non-native pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A.
(2003) Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boula de Mareüil, P., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B.
(2006) The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent. Phonetica, 63(4), 247–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2020) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.1.09) [Computer software]. [URL]
Carter, R.
(1998) Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT Journal, 52(1), 43–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter-Thomas, S., & Jacques, M.-P.
(2017) Interdisciplinary and interlinguistic perspectives on academic discourse: The mode variable. CHIMERA. Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 1–11. [URL]
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. M.
(2010) Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J.
(1991) Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M.
(2005) The creation of a prosodically transcribed intercultural corpus: The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English (prosodic). ICAME Journal, 29, 47–68. [URL]
Coughlin, C., & Tremblay, A.
(2012) The role of prosodic information in L2 speech segmentation. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Online proceedings of the 35th Boston University conference on language development [Supplement] (pp. 1–18). Cascadilla Press. [URL]
Cristia, A., Seidl, A., Vaughn, C., Schmale, R., Bradlow, A., & Floccia, C.
(2012) Linguistic processing of accented speech across the lifespan. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 479, 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W.
(1997) Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40(2), 141–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, A.
(2013) Native speakers and native users: Loss and gain. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Meo, A.
(2012) How credible is a non-native speaker? Prosody and surroundings. In M. G. Busà, & A. Stella (Eds.), Methodological perspectives on second language prosody. Papers from ML2P (pp. 3–9). Padua: Cooperativa Libraria Editrice Università di Padova (CLEUP).Google Scholar
De Meo, A., Vitale, M., Pettorino, M., Cutugno, F., & Origlia, A.
(2013) Imitation/self-imitation in computer-assisted prosody training for Chinese learners of L2 Italian. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Aug. 2012 (pp. 90–100). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
(2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42(4), 476–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
(2013) English-Medium Instruction at universities: Global challenges. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dolbec, J., & Santi, S.
(1995) Effet du filtre linguistique sur la perception de l’accent: Etude exploratoire [Effect of the linguistic filter on accent perception]. Travaux de l’Institut de Phonétique d’Aix, 16, 41–60. [URL]
Dupoux, E., & Peperkamp, S.
(1999) Fossil markers of language development: Phonological “deafness” in adult speech processing. In B. Laks & J. Durand (Eds.), Cognitive Phonology (pp. 168–190). Oxford University Press. [URL]
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastian-Galles, N.
(2001) A robust method to study stress-deafness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606–1618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R.
(1977) Markedness and the constrastive analysis hypotheis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
European Ministers of Higher Education
(1999) The Bologna declaration of 19 June 1999: Joint declaration of the European ministers of education. European Association of Institutions in Higher Education (EURASHE). [URL]
Feldon, D. F., Callan, G., Juth, S., & Jeong, S.
(2019) Cognitive load as motivational cost. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 319–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E.
(1995) Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues in cross-language speech research (pp. 233–272). York Press.Google Scholar
(2018) It’s input that matters most, not age. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21 (5), 919–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Schirru, C. & MacKay, I.
(2003) Interaction between the native and second language phonetic subsystems. Speech Communication, 40(4), 467–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, H.
(2011) Speaking and listening in the multicultural university: A reflective case study. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 5(1), A110–A128. [URL]
Frost, D.
(2011) Stress and cues to relative prominence in English and French: A perceptual study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(01), 67–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frost, D. & O’Donnell, J.
(2018) Evaluating the essentials, the place of prosody in oral production. In J. Volín, & R. Skarnitzl (Eds.), The pronunciation of English by speakers of other languages (pp. 228–259). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J.
(2010) The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Álvarez, D.
(2020) Languages and internationalisation: Strategies and policies. In D. González-Álvarez & E. Rama-Martínez (Eds.), Languages and the internationalisation of higher education (pp. 10–28). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
González-Álvarez, D., & Rama-Martínez, E.
(2020) Languages and the internationalisation of higher education. Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Greere, A., & Räsänen, A.
(2008) Report on the LANQUA subproject on Content and Language Integrated Learning: Redefining CLIL – Towards Multilingual Competence. [URL]
Hassan Al-Ahdal, A. A. M., Al-Hattami, A. A., Al-Awaid, S. A. A., & Al-Mashaqba, N. J. H.
(2015) Pronunciation for the Arab Learners of EFL: Planning for better outcomes. English Language Teaching, 8(10), 100–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A., & Cauldwell, R.
(2020) Jungle listening: A course in decoding English for psychology students. ASp, 77, 63–77. [URL]. DOI logo
Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S.
(2006) What is the relationship between phonological short-term memory and speech processing? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 480–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Muñoz, A.
(2020) Shortcomings in the professional training of EMI lecturers: Skills-based frameworks as a way forward. In D. González-Álvarez & E. Rama-Martínez (Eds.), Languages and the Internationalisation of Higher Education (pp. 120–138). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Kang, O.
(2010) Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R. I., & Moran, M.
(2018) Empirical approaches to measuring the intelligibility of different varieties of English in predicting listener comprehension: Measuring intelligibility in varieties of English. Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolly, M.-J., Boula de Mareüil, P., Leemann, A., & Dellwo, V.
(2017) Listeners use temporal information to identify French- and English-accented speech, Speech Communication 86, 121–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lado, R.
(1957) Linguistics across cultures. Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
(2009) Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
Levis, J.
(2005) Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levis, J., & Levis, G. M.
(2018) Teaching high-value pronunciation features: Contrastive stress for intermediate learners. The CATESOL Journal 30(1), 139–160. [URL]
Levis, J., & Venkatagiri, H.
(2007) Phonological awareness and speech comprehensibility: An exploratory study, Language Awareness, 16(4), 263–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, S., & Clower, A.
(2020) Language attitudes and the ‘ITA problem’: Undergraduate reactions to instructors’ (non)nativeness and pitch variation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 127–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2008) A Unified Model. In P. Robinson, & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 341–371). Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, G.
(1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A.
(2013) Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
(1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagèze, J., & Lasagabaster, D.
(2017) Teacher development for teaching and learning in English in a French higher education context. L’Analisi linguistica e letteraria, 25, 289–310.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, E.
(2012) The perception of foreign accented speech. Segmental and suprasegmental features affecting degree of foreign accent in Italian L2. In H. Mello, M. Pettorino, & T. Raso (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8 GSCP Conference (pp. 261–267). Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Pennington, M.
(1996) Phonology in English language teaching. Longman.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E.
(2002) A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. In C. Gussenhoven, & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 203–240). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pettorino, M., de Meo, A., & Vitale, M.
(2012) Transplanting credibility into a foreign voice. An experiment on synthesized L2 Italian. In H. Mello, M. Pettorino, & T. Raso (Eds.), Speech and corpora. Proceedings of the 7th GSCP International Conference (pp. 281–284). Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Polivanov, E.
(1931) La perception des sons d’une langue étrangère. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4, 79–96.Google Scholar
Pribram, K. H., Miller, G. A., & Galanter, E.
(1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Prieto, P., del Mar Vanrell, M., Astruc, L., Payne, E., & Post, B.
(2012) Phonotactic and phrasal properties of speech rhythm. Evidence from Catalan, English, and Spanish. Speech Communication, 54, 681–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulcini, V., & Campagna, S.
(2015) Internationalisation and the EMI controversy in Italian higher education. In S. Dimova, Hultgren, A. K., & Jensen, C. (Eds.), English-Medium Instruction in European higher education: English in Europe, Vol. 3 (pp. 65–87). De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Richter, K.
(2019) English-Medium Instruction and pronunciation: Exposure and skills development. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rognoni, L.
(2012) The impact of prosody in foreign accent detection. A perception study of foreign accent in English. In M. G. Busà, & A. Stella (Eds.), Methodological perspectives on second language prosody. Papers from ML2P 2012 (pp. 89–93). Cooperativa Libraria Editrice Università di Padova (CLEUP).Google Scholar
Rognoni, L. & Grazia Busà, M.
(2014) Testing the effects of segmental and suprasegmental phonetic cues in foreign accent rating: An experiment using prosody transplantation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 547–560. [URL]
Romero-Trillo, J.
(2018) Corpus pragmatics and second language pragmatics: A mutualistic entente in theory and practice. Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 113–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roussel, S., Joulia, D., Tricot, A., & Sweller, J.
(2017) Learning subject content through a foreign language should not ignore human cognitive architecture: A cognitive load theory approach. Learning and Instruction, 52, 69–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. L., & Smith, K. A.
(1990) Effects of accent, ethnicity, and lecture topic on undergraduates’ perceptions of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14(3), 337–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T.
(2015a) Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) Using listener judgments to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sereno, J., Lammers, L., & Jongman, A.
(2015) The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(2), 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J., & Swales, J. M.
(2002) The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Skarnitzl, R., & Rumlová, J.
(2019) Phonetic aspects of strongly-accented Czech speakers of English. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica, 2, 109–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smit, U.
(2010) English as a Lingua Franca in higher education: A longitudinal study of classroom discourse. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweller, J.
(1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 275–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajima, K., Port, R., & Dalby, J.
(1997) Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S.
(1939) Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 7.Google Scholar
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J.
(2005) Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volín, J., & Weingartová, L.
(2014) Acoustic correlates of word stress as a cue to accent strength. Research in Language, 12(2), 175–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volín, J., & Johaníková, T.
(2018) Weak structural words in British and Czech English. In J. Volín, & R. Skarnitzl (Eds.), The Pronunciation of English by speakers of other languages (pp. 181–195). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F.
(2002) English-language-taught degree programmes in European higher education: Trends and success factors. Lemmens. [URL]
Warren, P., Elgort, I., & Crabbe, D.
(2009) Comprehensibility and prosody ratings for pronunciation software development. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 87–102.Google Scholar
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F.
(2014) English language taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Lemmens. [URL]
Winters, S., & O’Brien, M. G.
(2013) Perceived accentedness and intelligibility: The relative contributions of F0 and duration. Speech Communication, 55(3), 486–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yan, X., & Ginther, A.
(2017) Listeners and raters: Similarities and differences in evaluation of accented speech. In O. Kang & A. Ginther (Eds.), Assessment in second language pronunciation (pp. 67–88). Taylor & Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar