Bilingual courtrooms are generally associated with the use of interpreted oral testimony to support monolingual judicial proceedings. Yet several postcolonial jurisdictions accord de jure or de facto standing to more than one language in court. The most studied is Malaysia, but the literature is far from exhaustive. Further research is to be encouraged because the way different legal systems accommodate bilingualism throws light on many questions central to forensic linguistics, including language rights, language planning in legal domains, cultural disadvantage before the law, genre-based communication strategies, and transparency of legal processes. This chapter reviews current evidence of and research into bilingual courtrooms and discusses the problems and potential benefits of including data on bilingual discourse in debates about language and justice.
2021. Questioning and answering strategies in Malaysian criminal proceedings. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 28:1
Berecz, Ágoston
2021. Linguistic diversity and the court system in Dualist Hungary. Multilingua 40:3 ► pp. 393 ff.
Powell, Richard
2020. English in Asian Legal Systems. In The Handbook of Asian Englishes, ► pp. 863 ff.
Leung, Janny H.C.
2019. Shallow Equality and Symbolic Jurisprudence in Multilingual Legal Orders,
Eades, Diana
2012. Intercultural Communication in the Law. In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication, ► pp. 408 ff.
Leung, Janny
2012. Statutory interpretation in multilingual jurisdictions: typology and trends. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33:5 ► pp. 481 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.