Approaching questions in forensic authorship analysis
Tim Grant | Centre for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University
This chapter demonstrates diversity in the activity of authorship and the corresponding diversity of forensic authorship analysis questions and techniques. Authorship is discussed in terms of Love’s (2002) multifunctional description of precursory, executive, declarative and revisionary authorship activities and the implications of this distinction for forensic problem solving. Four different authorship questions are considered. These are ‘How was the text produced?’, ‘How many people wrote the text?’, ‘What kind of person wrote the text?’ and ‘What is the relationship of a queried text with comparison texts?’ Different approaches to forensic authorship analysis are discussed in terms of their appropriateness to answering different authorship questions. The conclusion drawn is that no one technique will ever be appropriate to all problems.
2024. Conceptual Burstiness in Sociolinguistic Profiling of Radical-Criminal Communications: Corpus Method-Assisted Meaning Extraction for Investigative Leads. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Oxburgh, Gavin, Trond Myklebust, Tim Grant & Rebecca Milne
2015. Communication in Investigative and Legal Settings. In Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts, ► pp. 1 ff.
Perkins, Ria
2015. Native Language Identification (NLID) for Forensic Authorship Analysis of Weblogs. In New Threats and Countermeasures in Digital Crime and Cyber Terrorism [Advances in Digital Crime, Forensics, and Cyber Terrorism, ], ► pp. 213 ff.
Perkins, Ria
2022. Other Language Influence Detection. In Methodologies and Challenges in Forensic Linguistic Casework, ► pp. 63 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.