Chapter 2
Wisconsin immigrant letters
German transfer to Wisconsin English
This chapter outlines German transfer to Wisconsin English based on the analysis of ego-documents written by German immigrants
and their descendants to Wisconsin in the nineteenth century. The analysis of 111 letters from four generations of a German-American family
revealed 450 instances indicative of German transfer to English. Using these documents, we show how native German speakers learning English
transferred German-like features and structures (phonological, syntactic, and semantic transfer) to their English and how some of these
transfers remain in the regional English today. This is supplemented by an additional 101 letters from another family and their acquaintances
in Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. These additional documents exhibit similar patterns of transfer, indicating that the
transfer is not due to regional differences, but likely due to other factors such as generational language shift.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Linguistic transfer
- 1.2Nineteenth-century migration to Wisconsin
- 1.3Early adopters of English: The Krueger family
- 2.Phonological transfer
- 2.1Final neutralization
- 2.2Final neutralization hypercorrection
- 3.Syntactic transfer
- 3.1Topicalization
- 3.2
To-infinitival transfer
- 3.3Like + to-infinitival
- 4.Semantic transfer
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgment
-
Note
-
References
References (31)
References
Annear, Luke, Emily Claire, Alicia Groh, Alicia, Trini Stickle Simonsen, Nick Williams, Tom Purnell, Eric Raimy, Joseph Salmons. 2011. Why do English speakers neutralize VOICING finally? Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV), eorgetown University, Washington, DC.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cassidy, Frederic Gomes. 1985. Dictionary of American Regional English. Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cassidy, Frederic Gomes and Joan Houston Hall. 1996. Dictionary of American Regional English. Vol. 3. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delahanty, Jennifer. 2011. Changes in Wisconsin English over 110 Years: A real-time acoustic account. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin–Madison dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eichhoff, Jürgen. 1971. German in Wisconsin. In: Glenn G. Gilbert (ed.) The German Language in America: A symposium, 43–57. Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elspaß, Stephan. 2005. Sprachgeschichte von unten: Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elspaß, Stephan. 2012. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds) The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 156–169. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feinstein, Mark H. 1980. Ethnicity and topicalization in New York City English. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 26. 15–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Godfrey, Ann Marie and Leone Hoffman (eds) 1998. A Turn of the Century Courtship: Mom and Dad’s Letters. Ripon, WI: The editors.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hickey, Raymond 2010a. ‘Language contact: Reassessment and reconsideration’, in: Raymond Hickey (ed.) The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.1–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hickey, Raymond 2010b. ‘Contact and language shift’, in: Raymond Hickey (ed.) The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.151–169. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hock, Hans Henrich, and Brian D. Joseph. 1996. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship. An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Howell, Robert B. 1993. German immigration and the development of regional variants of American English: Using contact theory to discover our
roots. In: Joseph Salmons (ed.) The German Language in America, 1683–1991, 188–212. Madison, WI: Max Kade Institute for German-American Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney D., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krueger Family Papers, 1852-1965 (microfilm edition, 1979), State Historical Society of Wisconsin. Originals in the possession of Edgar Krueger, Watertown, Wisc.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langer, Nils. 2013. Norddeutsches in holsteinischen Soldatenbriefen von 1848–50. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 136. 73–95.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Litty, Samantha. 2017. We talk German now yet: The sociolinguistic development of voice onset time and final obstruent neutralization in Wisconsin German
and English varieties, 1863–2013. University of Wisconsin-Madison. PhD dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLellan, Marjorie L., Kathleen, Neils Conzen, and State Historical Society of Wisconsin. 1997. Six Generations Here. A farm family remembers. Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Purnell, Thomas, Joseph Salmons, and Dilara Tepeli. 2005a. German substrate effects in Wisconsin English: Evidence for final fortition. American Speech 80. 135–164. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Purnell, Thomas, Joseph Salmons, Dilara Tepeli, and Jennifer Mercer. 2005b. Structured heterogeneity and change in laryngeal phonetics: Upper midwestern final obstruents. Journal of English Linguistics 33. 307–338. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Purnell, Tom, Eric Raimy, and Joseph Salmons (eds) 2013. Wisconsin Talk. Linguistic diversity in the badger state. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Salmons, Joseph and Thomas Purnell. 2010. Contact and the development of American English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The Handbook of Language Contact. 454–477. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seifert, Lester W. J. 1993. The development of survival of German language in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. In: Joseph Salmons (ed.) The German Language in America, 1683–1991, 322–337. Madison, WI: Max Kade Institute for German-American Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sewell, Alyson and Joseph Salmons. 2014. How far-reaching are the effects of contact? Parasitic gapping in Wisconsin German and English. In Robert Nicolai (ed.), Questioning Language Contact: Limits of Contact, Contact at its Limits. 217–251. Leiden: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
U.S. Census Data from 1840 to 1900.
Van Coetsem, Frans. 1988. Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact. Dordrecht, Holland; Providence, RI: Foris Publications. Available at [URL] ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Coetsem, Frans. 2000. A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Carl Winter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Von Schneidemesser, Luanne. 2002. Settlement history in the United States as reflected in DARE: The example of German. American Speech 77: 398–418. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilkerson, Miranda E., Mark Livengood and Joe Salmons. 2014. The sociohistorical context of imposition in substrate effects: German-sourced features in Wisconsin English. Journal of English Linguistics 42.4. 284–306. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Litty, Samantha, Jennifer Mercer & Joseph C. Salmons
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.