Cover not available
Part of
Keeping in Touch: Emigrant letters across the English-speaking world
Edited by Raymond Hickey
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 10] 2019
► pp. 139–162

Chapter 7
‘Matt & Mrs Connor is with me now. They are only beginning to learn the work of the camp’

Irish emigrants writing from Argentina

The history of Ireland has been shaped by emigration. During the most intensive period of migration, many Irish travelled to North America, but considerable numbers were also destined for other parts of the world, including Latin America. During the nineteenth century, Argentina became one of the Latin-American destinations, with 40–45,000 Irish emigrants settling there (Murray 2004). Many of those settlers kept in touch with family and friends through letters that can now be studied for linguistic purposes. The letters, which are part of the Corpus of Irish English Correspondence, provide interesting insights into how Irish English (IrE) was preserved in a non-English speaking environment, sometimes for generations. The descendants of these settlers gradually switched to Spanish, and transfer features from Spanish are attested in the corpus.

Taking a historical sociolinguistic perspective, this chapter analyses the presence of some IrE features in the correspondence produced by the Irish-Argentines, and it raises some issues in relation to how borrowing can be an indicator of the creation of new language identities in an post-colonial context. The chapter also draws attention to the value of emigrant letters for the study of language variation and change.

Keywords: Irish English, language contact, private correspondence, emigrant letters, Corpus of Irish Engish Correspondence, Irish emigration, Irish Argentines
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and method for this study
  • 3.Hearing through writing
  • 4.Irish English transported
  • 5.Contact with Spanish
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.10.07ama
References
Amador-Moreno, Carolina P.
2006 An Analysis of Hiberno-English in the Early Novels of Patrick MacGill: Bilingualism and Language Shift from Irish to English in County Donegal. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
2010 An Introduction to Irish English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2012 The Irish in Argentina: Irish English transported. In Bettina Migge and Máire Ní Chiosain (eds) New Perspectives in Irish English, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.289–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Female voices in the context of Irish emigration: A linguistic analysis of gender differences in private correspondence. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies 16(1): 77–95.Google Scholar
2019 Orality in written texts: Using historical corpora to investigate Irish English (1700–1900). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ávila-Ledesma, Nancy and Carolina P. Amador-Moreno
2015 ‘The More Please [Places] I See the More I Think of Home’: On gendered discourse of Irishness and migration experiences. Jesús Romero-Trillo (ed.) Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016. Global Implications for Society and Education in the Networked Age, pp.85–105.Google Scholar
Beal, Joan and Corrigan, Karen P.
2000 Comparing the present with the past to predict the future for Tyneside English. Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 13–30.Google Scholar
Bliss, Alan B.
1979 Spoken English in Ireland 1600–1740. Dublin: Dolmen Press.Google Scholar
Bonness, Dania J
2015 ‘How is her eyes [?] are they still closed [?]’ Subject-verb concord in nineteenth-century Irish English. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 4: 5–36.Google Scholar
Boyle, Donald (= Ó Baoill, Dónall
) 1973 Generative Phonology and the Study of Irish Dialects. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Braidwood, John
1964 Ulster and Elizabethan English, In G. B. Adams, (ed.), Ulster Dialects: an Introductory Symposium. Holywood, Co. Down: Ulster Folk and Transport Museum, pp.5–109.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Corrigan, Karen P., Holmberg, Anders, Honeybone, Patrick, and Maguire, Warren
2013 T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics, 17(1): 85–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. M.
1917 The Vocabulary of Anglo-Irish. Saint Gall: Handels-Hoshschule. Siebzehnter and Achzehnter Jahresbericht.Google Scholar
Coghlan, Eduardo A.
1982 El Aporte de los Irlandeses a la Formación de la Nación Argentina. [The contribution of the Irish to the formation of the Argentinian nation] Buenos Aires: private edition.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P.
1992 ‘Glens’ dialect from Moira O’Neill to Michael J. Murphy’, in Ulster Folklife 38: 98–108.Google Scholar
2008 Irish daughters of Northern British relatives: Internal and external constraints on the system of relativization in South Armagh English. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola and Heli Paulasto (eds) Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts. London: Routledge, pp.133–162.Google Scholar
2010 Irish English: Northern Ireland. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croghan, Martin J.
1990 Swift, Thomas Sheridan, Maria Edgeworth and the Evolution of Hiberno-English, Irish University Review: A Journal of Irish Studies 20(1): 19–34.Google Scholar
de Rijke, Persijn M.
2016 ‘[S]ince we came across the Atalantic’. An empirical diachronic study of Northern Irish English phonology. PhD thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Delaney, Enda
2014 Migration and diaspora. In: Alvin Jackson, (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Modern Irish History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.126–147.Google Scholar
Doherty, Cathal
2000 ‘The Linguistic Heritage of Inishowen’, Proceedings of McGlinchey Summer School.Google Scholar
2002 The Grammar of Ulster English, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Dolan Terry P.
1998/2005 A Dictionary of Hiberno-English. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina. and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti
eds 2012 Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe Amsterdam John Benjamins
Elspass, Stephan
2012 The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy and J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds) The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, pp.156–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku
1981 Observations on thematic interference between Irish and English, Teanga: 2 23–31.Google Scholar
1986 Some Aspects of Hiberno-English in a Functional Sentence Perspective. University of Joensuu Publications in the Humanities.Google Scholar
1997a Cross-dialectal parallels and language contacts: Evidence from Celtic Englishes, in Raymond Hickey and Stansiław Puppel (eds) Language History and Linguistic Modelling. A Fetschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.943–957.Google Scholar
1997b Unbound Reflexives in Hiberno-English, in Anders Alqvist, and Vera Capková (eds) Dán do Oide. [A poem for the mentor] Baile Atha Cliath: Institúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann, pp.129–135.Google Scholar
1999 The Grammar of Irish English. Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Patrick and Lambkin, Brian
2008 Migration in Irish history 1607–2007 London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Godfrey, Elizabeth and Sali Tagliamonte
1999 Another piece for the verbal -s story: Evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change 11 (1): 87–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, John
1993 The Grammar of Irish English. In J. Milroy, and L. Milroy (eds), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London and New York: Longman, pp.139–186.Google Scholar
Hayden, Mary and Marcus Hartog
1909 The Irish dialect of English. Fortnightly Review 85: 775–785,933–947.Google Scholar
Henry, Patrick Leo
1957 An Anglo-Irish Dialect of North Roscommon. Dublin: University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Henry, Alison
1995 Belfast English and Standard English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004a A Sound Atlas of Irish English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2004b Dialects of English and their transportation. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Legacies of Colonial English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.33–58.Google Scholar
2007 Irish English. History and present-day forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hume, A.
1878 Remarks on the Irish dialect of the English language, Transactions of the Historic Society of Lancashire and Cheshire 3: 93–140.Google Scholar
Joyce, Patrick Weston
1991 [1910] English as We Speak it in Ireland. Edited with an introduction by Terence Dolan. Dublin: Wolfhound Press.Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey
1991 Intra-language transfer and plural subject concord in Irish and Appalachian English. Teanga 11: 20–34.Google Scholar
Kallen, Jeffrey L.
2013 Irish English, Vol. 2. The Republic of Ireland. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Helen
2009 Irish ‘Ingleses’: The Irish Immigrant Experience in Argentina, 1840–1920. Dublin: Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, John M. and Jeffrey L. Kallen
2006 Irish Standard English: how Celticised? How standardised? In Tristram, Hildegaard L. (ed.) The Celtic Englishes IV. Potsdam: Potsdam University Press, pp.88–113.Google Scholar
Korol, Juan Carlos and Hilda Sábato
1981 Cómo fue la Inmigración Irlandesa en Argentina. [How was the Irish immigration to Argentina] Buenos Aires: Editorial Plus Ultra.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
1967 Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, pp.12–44.Google Scholar
Macafee, Caroline I.
1996 A Concise Ulster Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin and Carolina P. Amador-Moreno
2012 CORIECOR – A Corpus of Irish English Correspondence, c. 1700 – 1900. Compiling and using a diachronic corpus to study the evolution of Irish English. In Bettina Migge and Máire Ní Chiosain (eds) New Perspectives in Irish English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.265–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in preparation. CORIECOR. The corpus of Irish English correspondence. Bergen and Cáceres: University of Bergen and University of Extremadura. DOI logo
McCafferty, Kevin
2003 The Northern Subject Rule in Ulster: how Scots, how English? Language Variation and Change 15: 105–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a ‘[W]ell are you not got over thinking about going to Ireland yet’: The be-perfect in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Irish English. In Marianne Hundt (ed.) Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.333–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b ‘I was away in another field […] got.’ A diachronic study of the be-perfect in Irish English. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 3: 135–161.Google Scholar
McKenna, Patrick
1994 Nineteenth-Century Irish Emigration to, and Settlement in, Argentina St. Patrick’s College, Maynooth, Co. Kildare: Unpublished MA Thesis.Google Scholar
2000 The formation of Hiberno-Argentine society. In Oliver Marshall (ed.) English-Speaking Communities in Latin America. London: Macmillan Press, 81–104.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael, Janet Fuller and Sharon DeMarse
1993 ‘The Black Men has wives and sweet hearts (and third person plural -s) jest like the white men’: Evidence for verbal -s from the written documents on nineteenth-century African American speech. Language Variation and Change 5: 335–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moylan, Seamus
1996 The language of Kilkenny. Dublin: Geography Publications.Google Scholar
Murray, Edmundo
2003 How the Irish Became Gauchos Ingleses. Diasporic Models in Irish-Argentine Literature. MA thesis, Geneva.Google Scholar
2004 Devenir irlandés: Narrativas íntimas de la emigración irlandesa a la Argentina, 1844–1912. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.Google Scholar
2006 Becoming Irlandés. Private narratives of the Irish emigration to Argentina (1844–1912) Buenos Aires: L.O.L.A.Google Scholar
Ó hÚrdail, Roibeard
1997 Hiberno-English: Historical background and synchronic features and variation. In Hildegaard L. C. Tristram, (ed.) The Celtic Englishes. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Carl Winter, pp.180–200.Google Scholar
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál
1984 ‘Agus (Is) / and: A shared syntactic feature’, Celtica, 16:125–137.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne and Carolina P. Amador-Moreno
2009 The pragmatics of the be + after + V-ing construction in Irish English. Intercultural Pragmatics 6: 517–534.Google Scholar
Quirk, Raandolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
1972/1989 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Ronan, Patricia
2002 Subordinating ocus “and” in Old Irish. In Markku Filppula , Juhani Klemola and Heli Pitkänen (eds) The Celtic Roots of English. University of Joensuu: Faculty of Humanities, pp.213–236.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph and Thomas Purnell
2010 Contact and the development of American English. In: Raymond Hickey (ed.) The Handbook of Language Contact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.454–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2002 Investigating variation and change in written documents. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling–Estes (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.67–96.Google Scholar
Shee, G.
1882 The Irish “brogue” in fiction: A protest. The Month 45: 363–375.Google Scholar
Stoney, F. S. [Pseud. Colonel O’Critical]
1885 Don’t Pat: A Manual of Irishisms. Dublin: McGee William.Google Scholar
Sullivan, James P.
1976 The Genesis of Hiberno-English: a socio-historical account. Unpublished PhD. thesis: Yeshiva University (authorised facsimile by University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1979).Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Jiro
1972 A Grammatical Analysis of Artistic Representation of Irish English. Tokyo: Shinozaki Shorin.Google Scholar
van Hamel, August G.
1912 On Anglo-Irish syntax, Englische Studien 45: 272–292.Google Scholar
Younge, K. E
1922-1927 ‘Irish idioms in English speech’, The Gaelic Churchman. Vol. 4: 46, 59, 82, 92, 117–118, 130, 143; Vol. 5: 155, 167, 176, 203–204, 214, 215, 225, 241, 266–267, 286–287; Vol. 6: 310–311, 334–334, 347, 383, 391, 401, 413, 428.Google Scholar