Cover not available
Part of
Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics: Isolation and contact
Edited by Whitney Chappell and Bridget Drinka
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 12] 2021
► pp. 17–48

Complexification of the early modern Spanish address system: A role for koineization?

| Emory University
The Spanish system of address pronouns suffered a dramatic increase in complexity between the 15th and 17th centuries. This study aims to explain how and why this change (or set of changes) took place when and where it did by using the model of koineization as a heuristic device. It argues that sociocultural factors (particularly widespread social status anxiety) and the salience of address forms played a primary role in driving the changes forward. It also argues, however, that sociodemographic factors associated with koineization (demographic movement and dialect mixing) contributed significantly to the timing, rapidity, location, and specific outcomes, including the grammaticalization of vuestra merced to usted and numerous other reduced forms.
Keywords: actuation, koineization, new-dialect formation, heuristic, address forms, grammaticalization, complexification, Spanish, vuestra merced, usted
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What is koineization?
  • 3.Koineization in early modern Spain and the new world
  • 4.Forms of address in koineization
  • 5.Complexification of the early modern Spanish address system
  • 6.Actuation of changes in the address pronoun system(s)
    • 6.1Setting the stage: Change in 15th-century court society and address
    • 6.2Early modern developments
  • 7.Conclusion: A role for koineization?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.12.c02tut
References (87)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Anipa, Kormi. 2001. A critical examination of linguistic variation in Golden Age Spanish. New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2014. Anmerkungen zum Salienzbegriff in der Soziolinguistik. Linguistik Online 66(4), [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allen. 2016. Succeeding waves: Seeking sociolinguistic theory for the twenty-first century. In N. Coupland (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 391–416. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola. 2002. Spanish forms of address in the sixteenth century. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address systems, 177–191. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boase, Roger. 1978. The troubadour revival: A study of social change and traditionalism in late medieval Spain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
Boyd-Bowman, Peter. 1976. Patterns of Spanish emigration to the Indies until 1600. The Hispanic American Historical Review 56. 580–604. Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2012. Koineization and cake-baking: Reflections on methods in dialect contact research. In Andrea Ender, Adrian Leemann & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Methods in contemporary linguistics, 219–238. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, Peter. 2000. A civil tongue: Language and politeness in early modern Europe. In P. Burke, B. Harrison & P. Slack (eds.), Civil histories: Essays presented to Sir Keith Thomas, 31–48. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cappella, Joseph. 1997. The development of theory about automated patterns of face-to-face human interaction. In G. Philipsen & T. Albrecht (eds.), Developing communication theories, SUNY series in human communication processes, 57–83. Albany: State University of New York Press.. Google Scholar
Casey, James. 1999. Early modern Spain: A social history. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castillo Mathieu, Nicolás del. 1982. Testimonios del uso de vuestra merced, vos y tú en América (1500–1650). Thesaurus 37. 602–644. Google Scholar
Coffen, Béatrice. 2002. Histoire culturelle des pronoms d’adresse: vers une typologie des systémes allocutoires dans les langues romanes. París: Honoré Champion. Google Scholar
Crawford, Michael J. 2014. The fight for status and privilege in late medieval and early modern Castile, 1465–1598. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Google Scholar
De Jonge, Bob. 2005. El desarrollo de las variantes de vuestra merced a usted. In Bob de Jonge (ed.), Actas del II Congreso de la Región Noroeste de Europa de la Asociación de Lingüística y Filología de América Latina (ALFAL). Estudios de Lingüística Española 22. Google Scholar
De Jonge, Bob and Dorien Nieuwenhuijsen. 2009. Formación del paradigma pronominal de las formas de tratamiento. In Concepción Company Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Segunda parte: La frase nominal. Vol. 2, 1593–1671. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Fondo de Cultura Económica. Google Scholar
Eberenz, Rolf. 2000. El español en el otoño de la edad media: sobre el artículo y los pronombres. Madrid: Gredos. Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1994. The civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Gallois, Cindy; Ogay, Tania; & Giles, Howard. 2005. Communication Accommodation Theory. In William B. Gudykunst (ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 121–48. Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar
García-Godoy, María Teresa. 2019. Una nueva hipótesis diacrónica sobre su merced como tratamiento informal. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 96(2). 107–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, Simon, & Clark, Aileen. 1993. The development of dialogue co-ordination skills in schoolchildren. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 101–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15. 87–105. Google Scholar
González Martínez, Rosa María. 2002. La población española: Siglos XVI, XVII, y XVIII. Madrid: Actas. Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Lyle Campbell, Jennifer Hay, Margaret Maclagan, Andrea Sudbury, Peter Trudgill. 2004. New Zealand English: Its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammermüller, Gunther. 2010. Evolución de las formas de tratamiento del español medieval hasta el siglo XVI. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge & M. E. Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 507–529. Mexico: El Colegio de México. Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Kyung-An Song. 2011. On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47. 587–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, Margarita. 2018. Diversification of Mexican Spanish: A tridimensional study in new world sociolinguistics. Boston and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Hodcroft, F. W. 1993–1994. ¿A mí un él? Observations on vos and él/ella as forms of address in Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Hispanic Research 2. 1–16. Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2013. Speaking Pittsburghese: The story of a dialect. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Discourse analysis. 3rd ed . Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.. Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8. 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Contact and new varieties. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), The handbook of language contact, 230–251. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Koineization. In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 519–536. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, and Ann Williams. 2000. Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29. 65–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, and Ann Williams. 2002. Salience as a factor in language change: Evidence from dialect leveling in urban England. In M. C. Jones & E. Esch (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 81–110. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Peter. 2008. Tradiciones discursivas y cambio lingüístico: el ejemplo del tratamiento vuestra merced en español. In J. Kabatek (ed.), Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico, 53–87. Frankfurt and Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana. Google Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael. 1970. Personas gramaticales y tratamientos en español. Revista de la Universidad de Madrid 19. 141–167. Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. Where do extraterritorial Englishes come from? Dialect input and recodification in transported Englishes. In Sylvia Adamson, Viven Law, Nigel Vincent & Susan Wright (eds.), Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge, 6–9 April 1987, 245–280. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
León, Ana Emilia. 2011. Extinción de vos en el español peninsular. New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Líbano Zumalacárregui, Ángeles. 1991. Morfología diacrónica del español: las fórmulas de tratamiento. Revista de Filología Española 71. 107–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ly, Nadine. 1981. La poétique de l’interlocution dans le théatre de Lope de Vega. Bordeaux: Université de Bordeaux. Google Scholar
Maravall, José Antonio. 1972. Estado moderno y mentalidad social. Volume II. Madrid: Revista de Occidente. Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. 1993. Koineization in the Bhojpuri–Hindi diaspora – with special reference to South Africa. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 99. 25–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Koinés. In R. E. Asher (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 1864–1867. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar
Milroy, James and Lesley Milroy. 1985. Linguistic change, social network, and speaker innovation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(2). 339–384. Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 1996. The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 13. 83–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko, Christophe Coupé, and François Pellegrino. 2017. Complexity in language: A multifaceted phenomenon. In Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives, Salikoko Mufwene, Christophe Coupé & François Pellegrino (eds.), 1–29. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newall, Gregory. 2016. Second person singular forms in Cali Colombian Spanish: Enhancing the envelope of variation. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms ofaAddress in the Spanish of the Americas, 149–169. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niculescu, Alessandro. 1974. Strutture allocutive pronominali reverenziali in italiano. Florence: Olschki. Google Scholar
Ochoa, Eugenio de (ed.). 1924. Epistolario español. Biblioteca de Autores Españoles 13. Madrid: Sucesores de Hernando. Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 1987. Patterns of language-change in Spain. London: University of London, Westfield College. Google Scholar
. 2000. Variation and Change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002a. Contacto de variedades y resolución de la variación: aspiración y pérdida de /h/ en el Madrid del s. XVI. In Juan Sánchez & María Teresa Echenique Elizondo (eds.), Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española (Valencia, 31 de enero–4 de febrero de 2000), Volume 1, 397–406. Madrid: Gredos. Google Scholar
. 2002b. A history of the Spanish language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin, & Garrod, Simon. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27. 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Martin, and Simon Garrod. 2017. Priming and language change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 173–190. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pla Cárceles, José. 1923. La evolución de tratamiento vuestra merced. Revista de Filología Española 10. 245–280. Google Scholar
Placencia, María Elena. 2010. El estudio de formas de tratamiento en Colombia y Ecuador. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge & M. E. Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 341–373. Mexico: El Colegio de México. Google Scholar
Pons, Lola. 2016. Centón epistolario de Fernán Gómez de Cibdarreal. Lemir: Revista de Literatura Española Medieval y del Renacimiento 20. 345–428. Google Scholar
Poussou, Jean-Pierre. 1997. Migrations et mobilité de la population en Europe a l’époque moderne. In Jean-Pierre Bardet & Jacques Dupaquier (eds.). Histoire des populations de l’Europe, 262–286. Paris: Fayard. Google Scholar
Ruiz, Teófilo. 2017. Spanish society, 1348–1700. Abingdon, Oxon/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanz-Sánchez. Israel. 2016. A diachronic perspective on Latin American Spanish Verbal Morphology: Reassessing the role of koineization. In Eva Núñez-Sánchez (ed.), Diachronic applications in Hispanic linguistics, 239–281. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. Google Scholar
Sanz-Sánchez, Israel. 2019. Documenting feature pools in language expansion situations: sibilants in early colonial American Spanish. Transactions of the Philological Society 117(2). 199–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2008. St. Helenian English: Origins, evolution and variation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The impact of migratory movements on linguistic systems: Transplanted speech communities and varieties from a historical sociolinguistic perspective. In J. M. Hernández-Campoy & J. C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 534–551. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 1985. Koines and koineization. Language in Society 14. 357–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Mixing, leveling, and pidgin/creole development. In A. K. Spears & D. Winford (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, 111–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229. Google Scholar
Sinnott, Sarah. 2013. Generalized conversational implicatures and indexical fields: The case of address forms. In Ana M. Carvalho & Sara Beaudrie, Selected Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics, 53–62. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Google Scholar
Svennung, Josef. 1958. Anredeformen. Vergleichende Forschungen zur indirekten Anrede in der dritten Person und zum Nominativ für den Vokativ. Uppsala: Lund. Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. 2018. In pursuit of civility: Manners and civilization in early modern England. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter, Elizabeth Gordon, Gillian Lewis, and Margaret Maclagan. 2000. Determinism in new-dialect formation and the genesis of New Zealand English. Journal of Linguistics 36. 299–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New dialect formation: The inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
. 2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society 37(2). 241–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Tabula rasa new-dialect formation: On the occasional irrelevance of language regard. In B. Evans, E. Benson & J. Stanford (eds.), Language regard: Methods, variation and change, 266–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. Dialect convergence and the formation of new dialects. In B. Joseph, R. Janda & B. Vance (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, volume II. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logo
Trudgill, Penny. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Tuten, Donald N. 2001. Modeling koineization. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 325–336. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuten, Donald N. 2003. Koineization in medieval Spanish. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo
Tuten, Donald N. 2008. Factores socioculturales en el desarrollo de vuestra merced / usted. In Concepción Company & José G. Moreno (eds.), Actas del VII Congreso Internacional de la Historia de la Lengua Española, 2189–2200. Madrid: Arco/Libros. Google Scholar
Uber, Diane. 2011. Forms of address: The effect of the context. In Manuel Díaz-Campos (ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics, 244–262. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdeón Baruque, Julio. 2001. Los Trastámaras: el triunfo de una dinastía bastarda. Madrid: Temas de Hoy. Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, Marvin Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehman & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–189. Austin: University of Texas Press. Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Graham, Lamar A.
2021. Personal vs. personalized infinitives in Ibero-Romance. In Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 12], ► pp. 50 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.