Cover not available
Part of
Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics: Isolation and contact
Edited by Whitney Chappell and Bridget Drinka
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 12] 2021
► pp. 77–102

Language variation and change through an experimental lens

Contextual modulation in the use of the Progressive in three Spanish dialects

| Utrecht University
| Yale University
Spanish exhibits two markers to convey a progressive meaning: the Simple Present and the Present Progressive. The use of these markers is contextually biased: the Simple Present requires contexts where speaker and addressee share perceptual access to the situation at issue, while the Present Progressive does not require such support. We test this generalization through real-time comprehension: the Simple Present marker in contexts without shared perceptual access should elicit slower reading times than within shared perceptual access contexts. A self-paced reading study (n = 176) in three different varieties of Spanish (Mexican, Rioplatense, and Castilian) bears this prediction out. Additionally, we find that the Mexican variety appears further advanced in the Progressive-to-Imperfective diachronic shift than its dialectal counterparts.
Keywords: Spanish, Progressive, dialectal variation, shared perceptual access, real-time methods
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Communicative situations, context and linguistic markers
  • 3.The meanings of the Progressive and the Imperfective
  • 4.Spanish diachronic and synchronic facts
  • 5.A questionnaire study on the event-in-progress reading
  • 6.Real-time interpretation of an event-in-progress reading: An SPR study
  • 7.Results
    • 7.1Behavioral results
    • 7.2Reading time results
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.12.c04pin
References (39)
References
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler & Ben Bolker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48. Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael & Barbara Partee. 1972. Toward the logic of tense and aspect in English. Santa Monica, California: System Development Corporation, ms. Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2000. The progressive in Romance, as compared with English. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 559–604. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, Christine Gunlogson & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2008. Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition 107(3). 1122–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Catherine R. Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Weber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 10–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
De Bruyne, Jacques. 1995. A comprehensive Spanish grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2009. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive: partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy 32. 475–521. Google Scholar
. 2015. The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: the progressive to imperfective shift. Semantics and Pragmatics 8. 1–52. Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1977. Towards a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English ‘imperfective’ Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 45–77. Google Scholar
Fafulas, Stephen. 2015. Progressive constructions in native-speaker and adult-acquired Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 8(1). 85–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fafulas, Stephen & Manuel Díaz-Campos. 2010. Variación morfosintáctica y lenguas en contacto: las formas analíticas y sintéticas del presente progresivo en el español monolingüe y bilingüe. Boletín de Filología 45(2). 71–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda & Charles Clifton Jr. 1986. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25(3). 348–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, M. Beatriz. 1992. El español en América. Madrid: MAPFRE. Google Scholar
Fuchs, Martín, María Mercedes Piñango & Ashwini Deo. 2020a (in press). Operationalizing the role of context in language variation: the role of perspective alignment in the Spanish Imperfective domain. In Sebastian Löbner, Thomas Gamerschlag, Tobias Kalenscher, Markus Schrenk & Henk Zeevat (eds.), Concepts, frames, and cascades in semantics, cognition, and ontology, chapter 10 (Language, Cognition and Mind 7). New York: Springer. Google Scholar
Fuchs, Martín, Ashwini Deo & María Mercedes Piñango. 2020b. The progressive-to imperfective shift: Contextually determined variation in Rioplatense, Iberian, and Mexican Altiplano Spanish. In Alfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow & Cristina Sanz (eds.), Hispanic linguistics: Current issues and new directions, 119–136. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Alison. 1993. How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16. 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Joy. E. & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2004. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science 28(1). 105–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Frank Bretz & Peter Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in General Parametric Models. Biometrical Journal 50. 346–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1980. Index, context, and content. In Stig Kanger & Sven Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and grammar, 79–100. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1955. On a question of aspect: A comparison between the progressive form in English and that in Italian and Spanish. Studia Linguistica 9. 45–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1962. Sevilla frente a Madrid. Algunas precisiones sobre el español de América. Miscelánea homenaje a André Martinet: Estructuralismo e Historia, 99–165. La Laguna: Universidad de La Laguna. Google Scholar
Moreno de Alba, José G. 1978. Valores de las formas verbales en el español de México. México: UNAM. Google Scholar
Nadig, Aparna S. & Julie C. Sedivy. 2002. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13(4). 329–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Premack, David & Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Brain and Behavioral Sciences 4. 515–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Google Scholar
Rosenblat, Ángel. 2002. El español de América. Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho. Google Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2009. Language in isolation, and its implications for variation and change. Language and Linguistic Compass 3(2). 682–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedano, Mercedes. 2000. La perífrasis de gerundio en Caracas y otras ciudades hispanohablantes. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 48(2). 253–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: New York Academic Press. Google Scholar
. 2002. Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 701–721.. Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2000. Grammaticization, synchronic variation, and language contact. A study of Spanish Progressive -ndo constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Johns Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Variation and grammaticisation: The emergence of an aspectual opposition. In Stavroula Tsiplakou, Marilena Karyolemou & Pavlos Pavou (eds.), Studies in language variation: European perspectives II (ICLaVE 4), 215–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Grammaticalization through inherent variability: The development of a progressive in Spanish. Studies in Language 36. 73–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellman, Henry. 1990. The child’s Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo. 2013. Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications, ms. Google Scholar
Zipf, George K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press. Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Piñango, María Mercedes & Martín Fuchs
2023. Cognitive underpinnings of the meaning of Spanish estar . Spanish in Context 20:2 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Anna Papafragou, John C. Trueswell & Lila R. Gleitman
2022. The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.