This paper makes the case that Historical Sociolinguistics holds critical implications for Construction Grammar, which in return can contribute ideas to the study of sociolinguistic change. The relation of these approaches is discussed from two angles. On the one hand, there are theoretical and methodological divergences that translate into mutual challenges. On the other hand, there are common goals and assumptions that make it worthwhile to combine the perspectives. The advantages and limitations of such a combined approach are illustrated on the basis of a corpus-based study of an idiomatic schema that is referred to as the sarcastic much? construction in this paper.
2014Slang in new media. A case study. In Julie Coleman (ed.), Global English slang. Methodologies and perspectives, 175–186. London: Routledge.
Auer, Peter, Julia Breuniger, Dominique Huck & Martin Pfeiffer
2015Auswirkungen der Staatsgrenze auf die Sprachsituation im Oberrheingebiet (Frontière linguistique au Rhin Supérieur, FLARS). In Roland Kehrein, Alfred Lameli & Stefan Rabanus (eds.), Regionale Variation des Deutschen, 323–348. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Spike Gildea & Lotte Sommerer
2012Entrenchment in usage-based theories. What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boas, Hans C
2013Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 233–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brône, Geert & Elisabeth Zima
2014Towards a dialogic construction grammar. A corpus-based approach to ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 457–495.
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan & Clay Beckner
2010Usage-based theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 827–855. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam A
1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Davies, Mark
2013Corpus of Global Web-based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries (GloWbE). Available online at [URL].
Deppermann, Arnulf
2011Konstruktionsgrammatik und Interaktionale Linguistik: Affinitäten, Komplementaritäten und Diskrepanzen. In Alexander Lasch & Alexander Ziem (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze, 205–238. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.
Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman
2004Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective, 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goffman, Erving
1979Footing. Semiotica 25. 1–30.
Goldberg, Adele E
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele. E
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grosjean, François & Ping Li
2013The psycholinguistics of bilingualism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre
(eds.)2012The handbook of historical sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, Martin
2014Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2015Cognitive sociolinguistic aspects of football chants: The role of social and physical context in usage-based Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 63(3). 273–294.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
(eds.)2013The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Imo, Wolfgang
2015Interactional Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1(1). 69–77.
Johnstone, Barbara, Jennifer Andrus & Andrew E. Danielson
2006Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics 34(2). 77–104.
Kay, Paul
2013The limits of (Construction) Grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 32–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kay, Paul & Charles J. Fillmore
1999Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75. 1–33.
Kristiansen, Gitte
2008Style-shifting and shifting styles: A socio-cognitive approach to lectal variation. In Gitte Kristiansen & René Dirven (eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Language variation, cultural models, social systems, 45–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kristiansen, Gitte & Dirk Geeraerts
2013Contexts and usage in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Journal of Pragmatics 52. 1–4.
Lakoff, George
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Nevalainen, Terttu
2012New perspectives, theories and methods: Historical sociolinguistics. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), English historical linguistics: An international handbook, vol. 2 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 34.2), 1438–1457. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Nevalainen, Terttu
2015What are historical sociolinguistics?Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(2). 243–269.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
(eds.)1996Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2012Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations and paradigms. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 22–40. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2017Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Pavlenko, Aneta & Barbara C. Malt
2011Kitchen Russian: Cross-linguistic differences and first-language object naming by Russian–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(1). 19–45.
Petré, Peter
2014Constructions and environments: Copular, passive and related constructions in Old and Middle English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schendl, Herbert
2012Multilingualism, code-switching and language contact in historical sociolinguistics. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 520–533. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Shank, Christopher, Koen Plevoets & Julie Van Bogaert
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ziem, Alexander
2015Probleme und Desiderata einer Social Construction Grammar. In Alexander Ziem & Alexander Lasch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionen als soziale Konventionen und kognitive Routinen, 1–22. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Zima, Elisabeth
2014Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V(motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 15. 1–48.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.