Examining Argumentation in Context
Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering
Editor
| University of Amsterdam
Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering contains a selection of papers on strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Starting point of all of these contributions is that a satisfactory analysis and evaluation of strategic maneuvering is possible only if the argumentative discourse is first situated in the communicative and interactional context in which it occurs. While some of the contributions present general views with regard to strategic maneuvering, other contributions report on the results of empirical studies, examine strategic maneuvering in a particular legal or political context, or highlight the presentational design of strategic maneuvering. Examining Argumentation in Context therefore provides an insightful view of recent developments in the research on strategic maneuvering, which is currently prominent in the study of argumentation.
[Argumentation in Context, 1] 2009. x, 305 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | pp. ix–x
-
Strategic maneuvering: Examining argumentation in contextFrans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser | pp. 1–24
-
Strategic maneuvering with dissociationM.A. van Rees | pp. 25–39
-
Constrained maneuvering: Rhetoric as a rational enterpriseChristopher W. Tindale | pp. 41–59
-
Plausible and fallacious strategies to silence one’s opponentManfred Kienpointner | pp. 61–75
-
Strategic maneuvering in direct-to-consumer drug advertising: Argument, contestation, and institutionsG. Thomas Goodnight | pp. 77–92
-
Strategic manoeuvring in the justification of judicial decisionsEveline T. Feteris | pp. 93–114
-
Strategic maneuvering in political argumentationDavid Zarefsky | pp. 115–130
-
Legitimation and strategic maneuvering in the political fieldIsabela Fairclough | pp. 131–151
-
Accusing someone of an inconsistency as a confrontational way of strategic manoeuvringCorina Andone | pp. 153–169
-
Manoeuvring strategically in Prime Minister’s Question TimeDima Mohammed | pp. 171–189
-
Quid pro nobis: Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysisJeanne Fahnestock | pp. 191–220
-
Shifting the topic in Dutch parliament: How presentational choices can be instrumental in strategic manoeuvringYvon Tonnard | pp. 221–240
-
The contribution of praeteritio to arguers’ confrontational strategic manoeuvresFrancisca Snoeck Henkemans | pp. 241–255
-
Manoeuvring with voices: The polyphonic framing of arguments in an institutional advertisementAndrea Rocci | pp. 257–283
-
Persuasive effects of strategic maneuvering: Some findings from meta-analyses of experimental persuasion effects researchDaniel J. O'Keefe | pp. 285–296
-
About the contributors | pp. 297–302
-
Index | pp. 303–306
“The strength of this collection is its focus on strategic maneuvering for use in argumentation analysis. Readers of this collection will learn about the evolution, complexities, extensions, and applications of this theory. [...] The late Peter Houtlosser, to whom this book is dedicated, surely would be pleased to see so many provocative essays that his work with Van Eemeren has inspired form a wide range of disciplinary interests and from many European and North American authors.”
Ja Nice Schuetz, University of New Mexico, in Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation
“An excellent collection of studies in applied argumentation, “Examining Argumentation in Context” adds significantly to the ongoing and increasingly relevant stream investigating how argumentative discourse affects and is affected by the institutional fields within which it occurs. By showing how dialectical and rhetorical strategies are jointly activated in different communicative practices in order to successfully perform the arguers' intervention in contexts, this volume constitutes a stimulating introduction to a promising book series.”
Eddo Rigotti
Cited by
Cited by 14 other publications
De Ascaniis, Silvia & Sara Greco Morasso
2011.
In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2011,
► pp. 125 ff. 
Degano, Chiara & Federico Giulio Sicurella
2019.
In Imagining the Peoples of Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 83],
► pp. 43 ff.
Duarte, Antonio
2020.
In From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild [Argumentation Library, 35],
► pp. 205 ff.
Eemeren, Frans H.
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela & Norman Fairclough
2011. Practical reasoning in political discourse: The UK government’s response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report.
Discourse & Society 22:3 ► pp. 243 ff.
Gâţă, Anca
2017.
In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],
► pp. 309 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna W. Visser
2014.
In Let's talk politics [Argumentation in Context, 6],
► pp. 63 ff.
Lauwers, Jeroen, Tom Deneire & David Eelbode
2015. The question of literary quality.
Scientific Study of Literature 5:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Mădroane, Irina Diana
2019.
In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],
► pp. 33 ff.
Oswald, Steve, Thierry Herman & Jérôme Jacquin
2018.
In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32],
► pp. 1 ff.
Paglieri, Fabio & Cristiano Castelfranchi
2010. Why argue? Towards a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation.
Argument & Computation 1:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Palmieri, Rudi
2017. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.) (2015). Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Pisarevskaya, Dina, Maria Kobozeva, Yulia Petukhova, Sergey Sedov & Svetlana Toldova
2019.
In Digital Transformation and Global Society [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1038],
► pp. 708 ff.
van Bijnen, Emma & Sara Greco
2018. Divide to unite.
Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Communication Studies
Philosophy
BIC Subject: CFA – Philosophy of language
BISAC Subject: LAN015000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric