Table of contents
Cross-disciplinary perspectives on context-specific argumentation practices
1
Section I.Theoretical perspectives on argumentation – revisited
Chapter 1.Uncontroversial arguments
21
Chapter 2.Connection premises: Their character, criticism, and defence
39
Chapter 3.Argumentative and non-argumentative rhetorical content: Two examples in same-sex marriage discourse
57
Section II.Argumentation practices in political discourse environments
Chapter 4.Questioning the questionable: Arguments and counter-arguments in political accountability interviews
73
Chapter 5.Reason and passion in political rhetoric: The case of Louise Michel’s (1830–1905) revolutionary discourse
99
Chapter 6.Interpersonal style(s) in diplomatic argumentation online: A study of argument schemes and evaluation in press releases of UNSC permanent members
127
Section III.Argumentation practices in legal discourse environments
Chapter 7.The interpreter-mediated police interview as argumentative discourse: A case-study
151
Chapter 8.Context and genre in judicial argumentation: A case study
177
Section IV.Argumentation practices in debates on societal and family issues
Chapter 9.Caught between profitability and responsibility: Arguing legitimacy in the pharmaceutical industry
197
Chapter 10.Multi-participant TV debate as an argumentative activity type
229
Chapter 11.The transmission of what is taken for granted in children’s socialization: The role of argumentation in family interactions
259
Section V.Argumentation practices in multi-modal discourse environments
Chapter 12.Visual arguments in activists’ campaigns: A pragmadialectical perspective
291
Chapter 13.Attacks on the cartoonist’s strategic manoeuvring: An argumentative analysis of criticism on political cartoons
317
Name index
339
Subject index
341
This article is available free of charge.