References

References

Eemeren, F. H. van
(2016) Identifying argumentative patterns. A vital step in the methodical development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 30(1), 1–23. (Special issue on argumentative patterns in discourse). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geis, M. L.
(1982) The language of television advertising. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodnight, G. T.
(2008) Strategic maneuvering in direct to consumer drug advertising. A study in argumentation theory and new institutional theory. Argumentation, 22(3), 359–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Health Canada
(2006) Consumer advertising guidelines for marketed health products (for nonprescription drugs including natural health products. http://​www​.hc​-sc​.gc​.ca​/dhp​-mps​/advert​-publicit​/pol​/guide​-ldir​_consom​_consum​-eng​.php
Keuringsraad KOAG/KAG
Jacobs, S.
(1995) Implicatures and deception in the arguments of commercial advertising. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Special fields and cases. Proceedings of the third ISSA conference on argumentation. Vol. IV (pp. 579–592). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
PAGB Medicines Advertising codes
Poppel, L. van, & Rubinelli, S.
(2011) ‘Try the smarter way’. On the claimed efficacy of advertised medicines. In E. T. Feteris, B. Garssen & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics (pp. 153–164). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rubinelli, S., Nakamoto, K., & Schulz, P. J.
(2008) The rabbit in the hat. Dubious argumentation and the persuasive effects of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicines. Communication & Medicine, 5(1), 49–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierda, R.
(2015) Experience-based authority argumentation in direct-to-consumer medical advertisements. An analytical and experimental study concerning the strategic anticipation of critical questions. Doctoral dissertation University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wierda, R. & Visser, J.
(2014) Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type. In S. Rubinelli & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Argumentation and health (pp. 81–96). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar