Chapter published in:
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 110
References

References

Eemeren, F. H. van
(Ed.) (2002) Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat/Vale Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam etc.: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 2. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2017), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B. J., & Meuffels, B.
(2009) Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Dordrecht: Springer. Argumentation Library 16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R.
(1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht/Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale (N.J.): Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (1994) Studies in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
(2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S.
(1993) Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa/London: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(2007) Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. Argumentation Library 12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(1997) Analysing Complex Argumentation. The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar