Cover not available
Part of
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 59–76

Chapter 4
The role of the judge in legal proceedings

A pragma-dialectical analysis

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The institutional implementation of a critical discussion in legal proceedings
    • 2.1The resolution of legal disputes and the administration of justice in accordance with the Rule of Law
    • 2.2 The implementation of the ideal of a critical discussion in legal proceedings
  • 3.The role of the judge in an impartial and final resolution of the dispute
    • 3.1The dialectical position of the judge
    • 3.2The role of the judge in the various discussion stages
      • The confrontation stage
      • The opening stage
      • The argumentation stage
      • The concluding stage
  • 4. Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.04fet
References

References

Aarnio, A.
(1977) On legal reasoning. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Alexy, R.
(1978) Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & R. Grootendorst
(1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988a) Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 2, 271–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988b) Rules for argumentation in dialogues. Argumentation 2, 499–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004) A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feteris, E. T.
(1990) Conditions and rules for rational Discussion in a legal process. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation and Advocacy 26, 2, 108–117.Google Scholar
(1993) Rationality in legal discussions. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Informal Logic, 15, 3, 179–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In: F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. IV (pp. 42–51) Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
(1999) Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions. Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Habermas′ discourse theory and the rationality of law: the complementary relationship between the ideal of communicative rationality and legal discussions. Informal Logic, 23, 2, 139–159.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.
(1988) The Tanner lectures on human values, 8,. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N.
(2005) Rhetoric and the rule of law. A theory of legal reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N. & R. Summers
(1991) Interpreting statutes. A comparative study. Aldershot etc.: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Peczenik, A.
(1983) The basis of legal justification. Internal publication University of Lund. Lund.Google Scholar
Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
(1958) La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Brussels, l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. E.
(1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.