Chapter published in:
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 5976
References

References

Aarnio, A.
(1977) On legal reasoning. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Alexy, R.
(1978) Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van
(2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, Amsterdam, John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van & R. Grootendorst
(1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988a) Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 2, 271–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988b) Rules for argumentation in dialogues. Argumentation 2, 499–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2004) A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feteris, E. T.
(1990) Conditions and rules for rational Discussion in a legal process. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation and Advocacy 26, 2, 108–117.Google Scholar
(1993) Rationality in legal discussions. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Informal Logic, 15, 3, 179–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) The analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In: F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. IV (pp. 42–51) Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
(1999) Fundamentals of legal argumentation. A survey of theories on the justification of judicial decisions. Dordrecht etc.: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Habermas′ discourse theory and the rationality of law: the complementary relationship between the ideal of communicative rationality and legal discussions. Informal Logic, 23, 2, 139–159.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.
(1988) The Tanner lectures on human values, 8,. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N.
(2005) Rhetoric and the rule of law. A theory of legal reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N. & R. Summers
(1991) Interpreting statutes. A comparative study. Aldershot etc.: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Peczenik, A.
(1983) The basis of legal justification. Internal publication University of Lund. Lund.Google Scholar
Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
(1958) La nouvelle rhétorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Brussels, l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. E.
(1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke
2020. Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2  pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.