Chapter published in:
Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 93107


Amjarso, Bilal
(2010) Mentioning and then Refuting an Anticipated Counterargument. A Conceptual and Empirical Study of the Persuasiveness of a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.
(1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Block, Lauren G., and Punam Anand Keller
(1995) “When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-related Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 32.2: 192–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
(1984) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin / Dordrecht: De Gruyter / Floris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “The Study of Argumentation from a Speech Act Perspective.” In Pragmatics at Issue: Selected Papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp 17–22 August 1987, edited by Jef Verschueren, vol I, 151–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
(2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs
(1993) Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa-London: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser
(2002) “Strategic manoeuvring. Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” In Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, 131–160. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) “Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity.” In The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, edited by David Hitchcock, 75–84. Hamilton, Ontario: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.Google Scholar
(2006) “Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation.” Argumentation 20: 381–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
(2007) Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feteris, Eveline T.
(2002) “A Pragma-dialectical Approach to the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.” Argumentation 16: 349–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garssen, Bart J.
(1997) Argumentatieschema’s in Pragma-Dialectisch Perspectief. Een Theoretisch en Empirisch Onderzoek. Dordrecht: ICG Printing b.v.Google Scholar
Hoeken, Hans
(2001) “Anecdotal, Statistical, and Causal Evidence: their Perceived and Actual Persuasiveness.” Argumentation 15: 425–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornikx, Jos
(2005) Cultural Differences in the Persuasiveness of Evidence Types in France and the Netherlands. Dissertation Nijmegen. Amsterdam: F&N Boekservice.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
(1992) Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt: Frommann – Holzboog.Google Scholar
(2008) “Beating Cervical Cancer Q&A.” Brochure.Google Scholar
(2009) “Arm against Cervical Cancer. Your Guide to the HPV Vaccination.” Brochure.Google Scholar
NVKP Nederlandse Vereniging Kritisch Prikken
(2010) “Dossier HPV.”Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
(1969) The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. (Translation of La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Traité de l’Argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958). Notre Dame / London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Poppel, Lotte van
(2013) Getting the vaccine now will protect you in the future! Apragma-dialectical analysis of strategic maneuvering with pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. Dissertation University van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Rothman, Alexander J. and Peter Salovey
(1997) “Shaping Perceptions to Motivate Healthy Behavior: The Role of Message-framing.” Psychological Bulletin 121.1: 3–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schellens, Peter Jan
(1985) Redelijke Argumenten. Een Onderzoek naar Normen voor Kritische Lezers. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
(1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
(1997) Analysing Complex Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman
(1981) “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science, New Series 211.4481: 453–458.Google Scholar