Chapter 6
The strategic function of variants of pragmatic argumentation in health brochures
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A pragma-dialectical approach to pragmatic argumentation
- 3.Dialectical options in the argumentation stage
- 4.Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address doubt towards the standpoint
- 4.1Dialectical relevance of choosing pragmatic argumentation
- 4.2Rhetorical advantage of choosing pragmatic argumentation
- 5.Choosing pragmatic argumentation to address criticism
- 6.
Choosing pragmatic argumentation to attack opposing standpoints
- 7.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (28)
Amjarso, Bilal
(
2010)
Mentioning and then Refuting an Anticipated Counterargument. A Conceptual and Empirical Study of the Persuasiveness of a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering. Amsterdam: SicSat.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, J. L.
(
1962)
How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Block, Lauren G., and Punam Anand Keller
(
1995)
“When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-related Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 32.2: 192–203.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
(
1984)
Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin / Dordrecht: De Gruyter / Floris.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
(
1992)
Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst
(
2004)
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson, and Scott Jacobs
(
1993)
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa-London: The University of Alabama Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser
(
2002)
“Strategic manoeuvring. Maintaining a Delicate Balance.” In
Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, edited by
Frans H. van Eemeren and
Peter Houtlosser, 131–160. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser
(
2005)
“Theoretical Construction and Argumentative Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalised Types of Argumentative Activity.” In
The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, edited by
David Hitchcock, 75–84. Hamilton, Ontario: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser
(
2006)
“Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation.” Argumentation 20: 381–392.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
(
2007)
Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feteris, Eveline T.
(
2002)
“A Pragma-dialectical Approach to the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.” Argumentation 16: 349–367.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garssen, Bart J.
(
1997)
Argumentatieschema’s in Pragma-Dialectisch Perspectief. Een Theoretisch en Empirisch Onderzoek. Dordrecht: ICG Printing b.v.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoeken, Hans
(
2001)
“Anecdotal, Statistical, and Causal Evidence: their Perceived and Actual Persuasiveness.” Argumentation 15: 425–437.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornikx, Jos
(
2005)
Cultural Differences in the Persuasiveness of Evidence Types in France and the Netherlands. Dissertation Nijmegen. Amsterdam: F&N Boekservice.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kienpointner, Manfred
(
1992)
Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart – Bad Cannstatt: Frommann – Holzboog.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
NHS
(
2008)
“Beating Cervical Cancer Q&A.” Brochure.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
NHS
(
2009)
“Arm against Cervical Cancer. Your Guide to the HPV Vaccination.” Brochure.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
NVKP Nederlandse Vereniging Kritisch Prikken
(
2010)
“Dossier HPV.”![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perelman, Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
(
1969)
The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. (Translation of La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Traité de l’Argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1958). Notre Dame / London: University of Notre Dame Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poppel, Lotte van
(
2013)
Getting the vaccine now will protect you in the future! Apragma-dialectical analysis of strategic maneuvering with pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. Dissertation University van Amsterdam.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothman, Alexander J. and Peter Salovey
(
1997)
“Shaping Perceptions to Motivate Healthy Behavior: The Role of Message-framing.” Psychological Bulletin 121.1: 3–19.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schellens, Peter Jan
(
1985)
Redelijke Argumenten. Een Onderzoek naar Normen voor Kritische Lezers. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R.
(
1969)
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snoeck Henkemans, A. Francisca
(
1997)
Analysing Complex Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman
(
1981)
“The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science, New Series 211.4481: 453–458.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Martínez, Henny Luz Heredia & Elizabeth Artmann
2022.
Risk Communication During COVID-19: What Can We Learn from New Zealand?. In
Computer Supported Qualitative Research [
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 466],
► pp. 65 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.