This chapter demonstrates the rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photographs. More specifically, it examines photographs of the terrorist attacks on the USA on 9/11, 2001, and photographs of the Syrian toddler, Aylan Kurdi, who drowned during the migrant crisis in Europe in autumn of 2015. The chapter examines how these photographs exhibit argumentative dimensions and are used in argumentative ways in specific situations. A rhetorical, situational and textual-contextual approach demonstrates how a 9/11 photograph performed epideictic rhetorical functions, and how the images of Aylan Kurdi performed deliberative rhetorical functions. The chapter also examines the counter-argumentation to the Aylan Kurdi images and the widespread appropriation of the images into new argumentative forms.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.The genre of press photography
3.The rhetorical perspective
The situational and the contingent
Decisions about action
A form of human action and interaction
The establishing and sustaining of common values
4.A situational textual-contextual approach to multimodal argumentation
5.The epideictic functions of a 9/11 photograph
5.1The attacks on New York
5.2Victim 0001
5.3The epideictic rhetoric of Victim 0001
6.The deliberative functions of the Aylan Kurdi images
6.1The European migrant crisis
6.2The Aylan Kurdi images
6.3The response to the Aylan Kurdi images in the United Kingdom
6.4Counter-argumentation to the Aylan Kurdi images
6.5The sharing and appropriation of the Aylan Kurdi images
(trans.2004) Rhetoric. New York: Dover. Thrift Editions.
Arnheim, R.
(1982) The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Azoulay, A.
(2008) The civil contract of photography. New York: Zone Books.
Barthes, R.
(1980) Camera lucida. London: Vintage.
Batchen, G.
(2012) Picturing atrocity: Photography in a crisis. London: Reaktion Books.
Batziou, A.
(2011) Picturing immigration: Photojournalistic representation of immigrants in Greek and Spanish press. Chicago, IL: Intellect, The University of Chicago Press.
Becker, K., Ekecrantz, J., & Olsson, T.
(2000) Picturing politics: Visual and textual formations of modernity in the Swedish press. Vol. 2000:1, JMK skriftserie. Stockholm: Institusjonen för journalistik, medier och kommunikation Stockholms universitet.
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L.
(1996) Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 1–10.
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L.
(2007) Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 103–113.
Bitzer, L. F.
(1968) The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.
Bitzer, L. F.
(1980) Functional communication. In E. E. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition. Studies in the nature and uses of rhetoric (pp. 21–38). Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Unviversity Press.
Burke, K.
(1941) The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action. Louisiana: State University Press.
Caple, H.
(2013) Photojournalism: A social semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ceccarelli, L.
(2010) Shaping science with rhetoric : The cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius
(trans. 1954) Cicero in twenty-eight volumes: A 1: Rhetorical treatises [Cicero] ad C. Herennium: de ratione dicendi (rhetorica ad Herennium). Vol. 403, The Loeb classical library. H. Caplan (Trans.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Condit, C. M.
(1985) The functions of epideictic: The Boston massacre orations as exemplar. Communication Quarterly, 33, 284–298.
Greenwood, K., & Smith, C. Z.
(2007) How the world looks to us: International news in award-winning photographs from the Pictures of the Year, 1943–2003. Journalism Practice, 1, 82–101.
Hariman, R., & Lucaites, J. L.
(2007) No caption needed: Iconic photographs, public culture, and liberal democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hill, C. A., & Helmers, M. A.
(Eds.) (2004) Defining visual rhetorics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Holquist, M.
(1990) Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world, new accents. London: Routledge.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2000) Visuel politisk epideiktik. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 14, 18–31.
(2007) Visual argumentation in Scandinavian political advertising. A cognitive, contextual and reception oriented approach. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 124–132.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2013) Formulas of prize-winning press photos. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 465–490). Leiden: Leiden University Press.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2014) Hva er retorikk. Oslo: Universitetsforl.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2015a) The rhetoric of thick representation: How pictures render the importance and strength of an argument salient. Argumentation, 29, 197–215.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2015b) The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29, 115–132.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(Ed) (2015c) Visual and multimodal argumentation. Special issue Argumentation, 29.
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(2015d) Where is visual argument? In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory (pp. 107–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2004) Photojournalism: The professionals’ approach (5th ed.). Amsterdam: Focal Press.
Kock, C.
(2009) Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation, 23, 61–80.
Kock, C.
(2013) Defining rhetorical argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 46, 437–464.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T.
(1996) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Lester, P. M.
(2015) Photojournalism: An ethical approach. Florence: Taylor and Francis.
Linfield, S.
(2010) The cruel radiance: Photography and political violence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Menon, K.
(2008) Media communication and photo journalism. New Delhi: Mangalam Publishers.
Mirzoeff, N.
(1999) An introduction to visual culture. London: Routledge.
Mitchell, W. J. T.
(1992) The reconfigured eye: Visual truth in the post-photographic era. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Olson, L. C., Finnegan, C. A., & Hope, D. S.
(Eds.) (2008) Visual rhetoric: A reader in communication and American culture. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
(1969) The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.
Perlmutter, D. D.
(1998) Photojournalism and foreign policy: Icons of outrage in international crises. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
Prelli, L. J.
(Ed.) (2006) Rhetorics of display: Studies in rhetoric/communication. Columbia, SC University of South Carolina Press.
Quintilianus, Marcus Fabius
(trans.1922) The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian: In four volumes: 3, The Loeb classical library. London: William Heinemann.
Richards, I. A.
(1936) The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ritchin, F.
(2009) After photography. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Ritchin, F.
(2013) Bending the frame: Photojournalism, documentary, and the citizen (1st ed.). New York: Aperture Foundation.
Roque, G.
this volume). Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective.
Sontag, S.
(1990) On photography. New York: Anchor Books.
Sontag, S.
(2003) Regarding the pain of others. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Stromer-Galley, J., & Schiappa, E.
(1998) The argumentative burdens of audience conjectures: Audience research in popular culture criticism. Communication Theory, 8, 27–62.
Tindale, C. W.
(1999) Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Tindale, C. W.
(2004) Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Van den Hoven, P., & Schilperoord, J.
this volume). Perspective by incongruity. Visual argumentative meaning in editorial cartoons.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M.
(2014) Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
Wenzel, J.
(1992) Perspectives on argument. In W. L. Benoit, D. Hample, & P. J. Benoit (Eds.), Readings in argumentation (pp. 121–144). Berlin, New York: Foris Publications.
Willard, C. A.
(1989) A theory of argumentation. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Zarefsky, D.
(2014) Rhetorical perspectives on argumentation: Selected essays by David Zarefsky. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zelizer, B.
(2010) About to die: How news images move the public. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
+++
Cited by (10)
Cited by 10 other publications
Martikainen, Jari & Inari Sakki
2024. Visual humanization of refugees: A visual rhetorical analysis of media discourse on the war in Ukraine. British Journal of Social Psychology 63:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
2023. Argument by Association: On the Transmissibility of Commitment in Public Political Arguments. Topoi 42:2 ► pp. 625 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris
2022. Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts. Journal of Language and Discrimination
Novak, Marko
2021. Visual as Multi-Modal Argumentation in Law. Bratislava Law Review 5:1 ► pp. 91 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2020. Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies 17:5 ► pp. 545 ff.
Vezovnik, Andreja & Ljiljana Šarić
2020. Subjectless images: visualization of migrants in Croatian and Slovenian public broadcasters’ online news. Social Semiotics 30:2 ► pp. 168 ff.
Kjeldsen, Jens E.
2018. Visual rhetorical argumentation. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 69 ff.
Kjeldsen, Jens E.
2021. Visual Rhetoric and the Power of Imagery: A Brief Lesson in the Rhetorical Power of Images and the Need for phronesis and krisis in the Teaching of Visual Rhetoric. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lugea, Jane
2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4 ► pp. 329 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.