Chapter published in:
Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres
Edited by Assimakis Tseronis and Charles Forceville
[Argumentation in Context 14] 2017
► pp. 138164
References

References

Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L.
(1996) Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 1–10.Google Scholar
Blair, J. A.
(2012) Groundwork in the theory of argumentation: Selected papers of J. Anthony Blair. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, B. S.
(1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives book 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Booth, W. C.
(1983) The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bostdorff, D. M.
(1987) Making light of James Watt: A Burkean approach to the form and attitude of political cartoons. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 73, 43–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C.
(2011) Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10, 209–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T.
(2005) Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1510–1536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. L., & Winkler, C. K.
(1997) Representative form and the visual ideograph: The Iwo Jima image in editorial cartoons. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83, 289–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feteris, E. T.
(2012) Strategisch manoeuvreren in politieke cartoons met een visuele scenariometafoor. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 34, 199–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, A. P.
(1992) The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forabosco, G.
(2008) Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research? Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4, 45–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2014) Relevance Theory as model for analysing visual and multimodal communication. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 51–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Govier, T.
(2010) A practical study of argument (7th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Groarke, L.
(this volume). Editorial cartoons and ART: Arguing with Pinocchio.
Hariman, R., & Lucaites, J. L.
(2002) Performing civic identity: The iconic photograph of the flag raising on Iwo Jima. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 88, 363–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. S.
(2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Language, consciousness, culture. Essays on mental structure. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, J. E.
(this volume). The rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photography.
Lucassen, L., & Lucassen, J.
(2011) Winnaar en verliezers. Een nuchtere balans van vijfhonderd jaar immigratie. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Medhurst, M. J., & DeSousa, M. A.
(1981) Political cartoons as rhetorical form: A taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communication Monographs, 48, 197–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moens, M., & Steedman, M.
(1988) Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics, 14, 15–15Google Scholar
Mussolf, A.
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mussweiler, T.
(2003) Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M.
(2011) Event perception. Wire’s Cognitive Science, 2, 608–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, G.
(1999) Developing the incongruity-resolution theory. Informatics research report EDI-INF-RR-0007. University of Edinburg.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J.
(forthcoming). Ways with pictures: Visual incongruities and metaphor. In G. Steen Ed. Visual metaphor: Structure and process.
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A. A.
(2009) Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville, & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 213–243). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schilperoord, J.
(2013) Raising the issue: A mental-space approach to Iwo Jima-inspired editorial cartoons. Metaphor and Symbol, 28, 185–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van den Hoven, P.
(2015) Cognitive semiotics in argumentation: A theoretical exploration. Argumentation, 29, 157–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B.
(2001) Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3–21. Crossref +++Google Scholar