Chapter 10
The “seeds” of charisma
Multimodal rhetoric of Mussolini’s discourse
Given its role in leaders’ persuasive skills, “charisma” is a relevant field for multimodal rhetoric. This chapter investigates Mussolini’s charisma in his speeches and multimodal communication. According to a socio-cognitive model, charisma is a set of a person’s internal features, manifested by external displays – words, voice, gestures, facial expression – that have an important role in persuasion since, triggering positive emotions, they induce others to pursue goals in a convinced, engaged, enthusiastic way. Various internal features that are the bulk of a speaker’s persuasiveness, such as imperiousness, categoricity, empathy, or creativity, are first identified in Mussolini’s words and speech acts. Then an annotation scheme of his multimodal communication is employed to identify how these features are displayed in Mussolini’s prosody, gestures, facial expressions, and posture. The analysis shows that their frequency and combination only rarely make up a “Benevolent” type of charisma, and more often shape an “Authoritarian-Threatening” and a “Proactive-Attractive” charisma.
Article outline
- 1.Charisma: The non-argumentative side of persuasion
- 2.Studies in multimodal rhetoric and charismatic communication
- 3.A goal and belief view of multimodal communication
- 4.A model of charisma
- 4.1The internal features of charisma
- 4.2The external displays of charisma
- 5.The “seeds” of charisma: Finding charismatic features in words and bodily behaviour
- 5.1Charisma in Mussolini’s words
- 5.1.1Charismatic words
- Nice-wordism
- Strong-wordism
- New-wordism: Mussolini’s creative language
- 5.1.2Charismatic communicative acts
- Incitations
- Orders, requests for commitment
- Rhetorical questions
- Threats
- Discrediting acts
- Expression of affect
- Expression of empathy
- Praise
- 5.2Charisma in Mussolini’s bodily behaviour
- 5.2.1An annotation scheme of charismatic body behaviours
- 5.2.2The “seeds” of Mussolini’s charisma
- 5.2.3Types of charisma in Mussolini’s multimodal communication
- 6.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References (51)
Atkinson, M.
(
1984)
Our masters’ voices. The language and body language of politics. London: Routledge.
Bligh, M. C., & Robinson, J. L.
(
2010)
Was Gandhi “charismatic”? Exploring the rhetorical leadership of Mahatma Gandhi.
The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 844–855.
Bull, P.
(
1986)
The use of hand gesture in political speeches: Some case studies.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 103–118.
Calbris, G.
(
2003)
L’expression gestuelle de la pensée d’un homme politique. Paris: CNRS Editions.
Cantarini, S., Abraham, W., & Leiss, E.
Castelfranchi, C., & Guerini, M.
Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
(
2008)
Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In
R. W. Gibbs (Ed.),
The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 483–501). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Conte, R., & Castelfranchi, C.
(
1995)
Cognitive and social action. London: London University College Press.
D’Errico, F., & Poggi, I.
(
2013)
The parody of politicians. Multimodal distorted imitation aimed at political discredit. In
P. Baranyi,
A. Esposito,
M. Niitsuma, &
B. Solvang (Eds.),
Proceedings of 4th IEEE International CogInfoCom 2013 (pp. 423–428). Berlin: Springer.
D’Errico, F., & Poggi, I.
(
2016) “
The bitter laughter.” When parody is a moral and affective priming in political persuasion.
Frontiers in Psychology, 7,
article 1144, published online
09 August 2016 doi:
.
D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., & Vincze, L.
(
2012)
Discrediting signals. A model of social evaluation to study discrediting moves in political debates.
Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 6, 163–178.
D’Errico, F., Signorello, R., Demolin, D., & Poggi, I.
(
2013)
The perception of charisma from voice. A cross-cultural study. In
T. Pun,
C. Pelachaud, &
N. Sebe (Eds.)
Proceedings of ACII Conference, IEEE (pp. 552–557). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
Duez, D.
(
1985)
Perception of silent pauses in continuous speech.
Language and Speech, 28, 377–389.
Festinger, L.
(
1957)
A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row & Peterson.
Gelang, M.
(
2013)
Towards a political actio. In
I. Poggi,
F. D’Errico,
L. Vincze, &
A. Vinciarelli (Eds.),
Multimodal communication in political speech. Shaping minds and social action (pp. 30–38). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hartmann, B., Mancini, M., & Pelachaud, C.
(
2002)
Formational parameters and adaptive prototype instantiation for MPEG-4 compliant gesture synthesis.
Proceedings of Computer Animation 2002, (pp. 111–119). Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J.
(
2011)
The new psychology of leadership. Hove: Psychology Press.
Jacquin, J.
(
2015)
Multimodal counter-argumentation in the workplace: The contribution of gesture and gaze to the expression of disagreement. In
G. Ferré, &
M. Tutton (Eds.),
GESPIN 4 Proceedings (pp. 155–160). Nantes: Université de Nantes.
Jacquin, J.
this volume)
Embodied argumentation in public debates. The role of gestures in the segmentation of argumentative moves.
Kendon, A.
(
2004)
Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koutsombogera, M., & Papageorgiou, H.
(
2013)
Multimodal indicators of persuasion in political interviews. In
I. Poggi,
F. D’Errico,
L. Vincze, &
A. Vinciarelli (Eds.),
Multimodal communication in political speech. Shaping minds and social action (pp.16–29). Dordrecht: Springer.
Leone, G.
(
2013)
Sometimes I, sometimes me: A study on the use of autobiographical memories in two political speeches by Barack Obama. In
I. Poggi,
F. D’Errico,
L. Vincze, &
A. Vinciarelli (Eds.),
Multimodal communication in political speech. Shaping minds and social action (pp.133–148). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lindblom, B.
(
1990)
Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In
W. J. Harcastle, &
A. Marchal (Eds.),
Speech production modelling (pp. 403–439). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Martin, P.
(
2013)
Intonation in political speech: Ségolène Royal vs. Nicolas Sarkozy. In
I. Poggi,
F. D’Errico,
L. Vincze, &
A. Vinciarelli (Eds.),
Multimodal communication in political speech. Shaping minds and social action (pp.54–64). Dordrecht: Springer.
Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C.
(
1989)
A cognitive approach to values.
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 169–193.
Navarretta, C., & Paggio, P.
(
2013)
Multimodal behaviour and interlocutor identification in political debates. In
I. Poggi,
F. D’Errico,
L. Vincze, &
A. Vinciarelli (Eds.),
Multimodal communication in political speech. Shaping minds and social action (pp.99–113). Dordrecht: Springer.
Parisi, D., & Castelfranchi, C.
(
1975)
Discourse as a hierarchy of goals.
Working Papers, 54–55. Urbino: Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e Linguistica.
Poggi, I.
(
2007)
Mind, hands, face and body. A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Berlin: Weidler.
Poggi, I., & D’Errico, F.
(
2010)
Dominance in political debates. In
A. A. Salah,
T. Gevers,
N. Sebe, &
A. Vinciarelli (Eds.),
Human behavior understanding. First international workshop, HBU 2010, Istanbul, Turkey, August 22, 2010. Proceedings (pp. 163–174). Dordrecht: Springer.
Poggi, I., & D’Errico, F.
(
2013)
Towards the parody machine. Qualitative analysis and cognitive processes in the parody of a politician. In
A. Petrosino,
L. Maddalena, &
P. Pala (Eds.),
ICIAP 2013 Workshops, LNCS 8158 (pp. 491–500). Dordrecht: Springer.
Poggi, I., & D’Errico, F.
(
2016)
Finding Mussolini’s charisma in his multimodal discourse. In
F. Paglieri,
L. Bonelli, &
S. Felletti (Eds.),
The psychology of argument. Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion. London: College Publications.
Poggi, I., & D’Errico, F.
in preparation).
Multimodality, power, and social influence.
Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., & Vincze, L.
(
2012)
Ridiculization in public debates: Making fun of the other as a discrediting move. In
N. Calzolari,
K. Choukri,
T. Declerck,
M. Doğan,
B. Maegaard,
J. Mariani,
J. Odijk, &
S. Piperidis (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 8th international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’12) (pp. 44–50). Istanbul: European language resources distribution agency.
Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., & Vincze, L.
(
2015)
Direct and indirect verbal and bodily insults and other forms of aggressive communication. In
F. D’Errico,
I. Poggi,
A. Vinciarelli, &
L. Vincze (Eds.),
Conflict and multimodal communication. Social research and machine intelligence (pp. 243–264). Dordrecht: Springer.
Poggi, I., & Pelachaud, C.
(
2008)
Persuasion and the expressivity of gestures in humans and machines. In
I. Wachsmuth,
M. Lenzen, &
G. Knoblich (Eds.),
Embodied communication in humans and machines (pp. 391–424). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poggi, I., & Vincze, L.
(
2008)
Gesture, gaze and persuasive strategies in political discourse. In
J. C. Martin,
P. Paggio,
M. Kipp, &
D. Heylen (Eds.),
Proceedings of the workshop on multimodal corpora, LREC, Marrakech,
May 2008 (pp. 73–92). Dordrecht: Springer.
Poggi, I., & Zuccaro, V.
(
2008)
Admiration. In
G. Castellano,
K. Karpouzis,
C. Peters,
J. C. Martin (Eds.),
Proceedings of the workshop AFFINE: Affective interaction in natural environment, Post-conference workshop of ICMI 2008. Chania, Crete.
Roque, G.
this volume).
Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective.
Rosenberg, A., & Hirschberg, J.
(
2009)
Charisma perception from text and speech.
Speech Communication, 51, 640–655.
Signorello, R.
(
2015)
La voix charismatique. Aspects psychologiques et caractéristiques acoustiques. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Université de Grenoble et Università degli Studi Roma Tre.
Signorello, R., D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., & Demolin, D.
(
2012)
How charisma is perceived from speech. A multidimensional approach. In
A. Nijholt,
A. Vinciarelli, &
D. Heylen (Eds.),
Proceedings of ASE/IEEE social computation, Amsterdam
3–5 September 2012 Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
Signorello, R., D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., Demolin, D., & Mairano, P.
(
2013)
Charisma perception in political speech: A case study. In
H. Mello,
M. Pettorino, &
T. Raso (Eds.),
Proceedings of the VIIth GSCP international conference: Speech and corpora (pp. 343–348). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
Stevenson, C.
(
1944)
Ethics and language. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Strangert, E., & Gustafson, J.
(
2008)
What makes a good speaker? Subject ratings, acoustic measurements and perceptual evaluations. In
Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Interspeech 2008, Brisbane, Australia
22–26 September (pp. 1688–1691). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Streeck, J.
(
2008)
Gesture in political communication. A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign.
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 154–186.
Touati, P.
(
1993)
Prosodic aspects of political rhetoric. In
D. House, &
P. Touati (Eds.),
Proceedings of ESCA workshop on prosody (pp.168–171). Lund: Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, Lund University and the European Speech Communication Association.
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W.
(
2004)
Show your pride: Evidence for a discrete emotion expression.
Psychological Science, 15, 194–197.
Vincze, L., Poggi, I., & D’Errico, F.
(
2014)
Precision in gestures and words.
Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica – Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 9, 179–198.
Weber, M.
(
1978)
Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. 2 vols. (
G. Roth, &
C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press (Original work published 1913).
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Vincze, Laura & Isabella Poggi
2022.
Multimodal signals of high commitment in expert-to-expert contexts.
Discourse & Communication 16:6
► pp. 693 ff.
Lugea, Jane
2018.
The year’s work in stylistics 2017.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4
► pp. 329 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.