Index
A
- accountability
1–4, 8, 11, 18, 22, 64–71, 73, 73n9, 78, 79–81, 128, 129, 132, 135–137, 142, 145–146, 149n2
- accusation of inconsistency
see inconsistency
- activity type
16, 20–21, 53–58, 71, 72–78, 79, 81–83, 98, 138–141, 145–149
- multi-layered activity type
145–149
- aim
14, 16–20, 21, 30–32, 33, 38–40, 54–58, 64–71, 79, 107, 137, 145–149
- dialectical aim
31, 33, 57
- institution-related aim
68–69, 146
- institutional aim
55–58, 64–71, 78, 106, 145–149
- rhetorical aim
31, 43, 57–58, 106–107
- audience
19–21, 49–51, 95–98, 122, 137, 140, 144–145, 149
C
- coherence
1–3, 9–13, 14, 22, 127, 129, 135, 145
- commitment
12–13, 15–16, 35, 47, 51, 80–95, 116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 122, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 131, 132, 151
- inconsistent commitments
45–51, 82, 111–116, 117, 119, 120, 121, 151
- transferability of commitment
128–129, 138
- condition
22–24, 106, 110–127, 130–133, 135–140
- confrontation stage
17–18, 33–40, 43, 55–56, 107, 109, 110, 116, 117, 138–145
- confrontational strategic manoeuvring
see strategic manoeuvring
- consistency
see coherence
- constraint
21, 53–54, 139
- context
20–21, 53–58, 70, 127–133, 136, 139, 142, 144–149
- continuity requirement
109, 110, 116–121
- convention
7, 13, 16, 20–21, 53–58, 71, 72–75
- critical discussion
16–18, 20, 33–38, 55–56, 106–110, 111, 115, 117, 122, 137, 138–140
D
- dialectical profile
33–40, 43, 44, 47, 83–84, 138–140, 144
- dialectical route
39–44, 48, 108–110, 116–117, 122, 139
- dialectical soundness
18–20, 106, 108, 137
- difference of opinion
see dispute
- discussion passim
- simultaneous discussion
see simultaneous
- dispute
15–18, 30–44, 57, 73–74, 77–78, 83–87, 96–98, 101, 107–110, 115, 129, 145–148
- mixed dispute
31, 34, 36, 43, 74, 75, 77, 78, 83–86, 89–90, 98, 100, 103, 107, 109
- multiple dispute
77, 78, 89n1, 90, 96, 147–148
- no dispute
31–44, 48, 83–87, 96, 100–103, 107–108, 110, 141
- non-mixed dispute
31, 34–36, 43, 77, 83–85, 107, 109
- sub-dispute
76–78, 83, 85, 89
- doubt (expression of critical doubt)
11, 15, 17, 17n6, 31, 32, 34–51, 73–75, 78, 83–86, 97, 101, 108–118, 126, 130, 131, 140, 144, 151
E
- effectiveness
see rhetorical effectiveness
F
- fallacy20
-
ad hominem
14, 105, 106, 123, 141
-
straw man fallacy
111, 112, 114, 140
-
tu quoque
14, 105, 106, 123, 141
- freedom requirement
109, 110,122–127, 151
I
- inconsistency passim
- accusation of inconsistency passim
- inconsistent commitments
see commitment
- illocution
17n6, 45, 48, 115, 117, 140
- institutional
13, 20–21, 29, 53–58, 64–71, 80–95, 96, 98–101, 127–133, 136–140, 145–149
- institution-related aim
see aim
- institutional aim
see aim
- issue
26, 70, 78, 93, 119,145–149
M
- members of Parliament passim
- multiple goals
19, 79, 145–149
- multiple interpretations
116, 143–149
- multiple issues
see issue
- multiple parties
see polylogue
P
- Parliament passim
- parliamentary procedure
4–9, 59–64, 71, 75, 83
- perlocutionary effect
45, 50, 116–117, 121
- pragma-dialectics
14–21, 57–58, 106, 115
- pragmatic
24, 106, 110, 137, 138, 140
- precondition
21, 23, 54–55, 72–78, 79, 83, 95–98, 137, 146
- profile
see dialectical profile
- public political argument
9, 13, 70, 148–149
R
- reasonableness
11, 14, 15, 18–21, 23, 57–58, 105–109, 127–133, 150–152
- dialectical reasonableness
see dialectical soundness
- relevance
39n3, 67, 109, 110, 111, 117, 121
- responsiveness requirement
109–116, 126, 130, 150
- rhetorical effectiveness
16, 19–20, 43, 57–58, 58n5
S
- simultaneous discussions
70, 93, 96, 147–149
- soundness
see dialectical soundness
- speech act
14–18, 24, 45–46, 50, 110, 117, 118, 140
- starting points
17, 54–56, 71, 74–76, 115, 122, 129, 143, 146
- strategic manoeuvring passim
- confrontational strategic manoeuvring
24, 31–32, 39, 40–44, 49, 106–110, 139
- types of strategic manoeuvring
39–44, 45, 48, 49, 108–109, 139
- ways of strategic manoeuvring
22–23, 44, 45, 49, 51, 80, 106, 110–111, 136, 143
- stylistic devices
19–20, 21, 49, 50, 95, 122, 137, 144
T
- topical selection
19–20, 21, 49, 72–76, 95–96, 122, 137, 140, 144
U
- usage declarative
34, 37–38, 84