Chapter published in:
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 6184
References

References

Andone, C.
(2013) Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M.
(1988) Our masters’ voices: The language and body language of politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barkin, S. M.
(1983) Eisenhower’s television planning board: An unwritten chapter in the history of political broadcasting. Journal of Broadcasting, 27(4), 319–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, W. L.
(2000) Comparing the Clinton and Dole advertising campaigns: Identification and division in 1996 presidential television spots. Communication Research Reports, 17, 39–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, A.
(2006) The critical discourse analysis of political press conferences. Discourse & Society, 17, 173–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
(1998) Ideology: A multidisciplinary study. London: Sage.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H.
(2010) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2(1), 11–32.Google Scholar
van Eemeren F. H.
(2019) Argumentative style: A complex notion. Argumentation 33(2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren F. H., & Garssen, B.
(2012) Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring argumentative contexts (pp. 43–58) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R.
(1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Kruiger, T.
(1978) Argumentatie theorie [Argumentation theory]. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
(1996) Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ekström, M.
(2006) Politicians interviewed on television news. Discourse & Society, 12, 563–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eshbaugh-Soha, M.
(2003) Presidential press conferences over time. American Journal of Political Science, 47(April), 348–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The politics of presidential press conferences. American Politics Research, 41, 470–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(1998) Political discourse in the media: An analytical framework. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N.
(2012) Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fischer, F., & Forester, H..
(2012) The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B.
(2011) Hedging in political discourse: The 2007 Bush press conference. Linguistics Journal, 5(1):169–196.Google Scholar
Garssen, B. J.
(1997)  Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek [Argument schemes in a pragma-dialectical perspective. A theoretical and empirical research]. Doctoral dissertation University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam: IFOTT.
Grootendorst, R.
(1999) Innocence by dissociation. A pragma-dialectic analysis of the fallacy of incorrect dissociation in the Vatican document ‘We Remember: A Reflection on the Shoah’. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & Ch. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 286–289). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M.
(2013) Strategic maneuvering in the political rhetoric of Barack Obama. Journal of Language and Politics, 12(3), 357–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manheim, J. B.
(1979) The honeymoon’s over: The news conference and the development of presidential style. Journal of Politics, 41, 55–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Ch., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.
(1969) The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
van Rees, A.
(2006) Strategic maneuvering with dissociations. Argumentation, 20(4): 473–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Dissociation in argumentative discourse: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
(2001) Discourse and discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryfe, D. M.
(1999) Betwixt AND between: Woodrow Wilson’s press conferences and the transition toward the modern rhetorical presidency. Political Communication, 16, 77–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, C.
(1997) Analyzing political speeches. London: Short Run Press.Google Scholar
Schiappa, E.
(1985) Dissociation in the arguments of rhetorical theory. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22, 72–82.Google Scholar
(1993) Arguing about definitions. Argumentation, 7, 403–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Defining reality: Definitions and the politics. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China
. (2015) Workbook for governmental press conferences. Beijing: Wu Zhou Publishing House.Google Scholar
Wu, P.
(2017) Strategic maneuvering by Strategic maneuvering by personal attack in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at diplomatic press conferences. Journal of Argumentation in Context. 6(3): 282–314.Google Scholar
Yan, Yi, & Chang, Tsan-Kuo
(2012) Institutionalizing public relations in China: A sociological analysis of the Chinese Premier’s press conference. Public Relations Review, 38, 711–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zarefsky, D.
(2004) Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 607–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zarefsky, D., Miller, F. E., & Miller-Tutzauer, C.
(1984) Reagan’s safety net for the truly needy: The rhetorical use of definition. Central States Speech Journal, 35, 113–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2019.  In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.