Chapter published in:
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 85102
References

References

Aitken, J.
(1993) Richard Nixon. A life. Washington, D.C.: Regnery.Google Scholar
Baskerville, B.
(1952) The Nixon affair. In F. W. Haberman (Ed.), The election of 1952: A symposium. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 38, 406–408.Google Scholar
(1961) The illusion of proof. Western Journal of Speech, 21, 236–242.Google Scholar
Blair, W. H.
(1952, Sept 19). ‘Cast out’ Nixon, Mitchell insists. New York Times, p. 9.Google Scholar
Condit, C. M.
(1989) Nixon’s “Fund”: Time as ideological resource in the “Checkers” speech. In M. C. Leff, & F. J. Kauffeld (Eds.), Texts in contexts: Critical dialogues on significant episodes in American political rhetoric (pp. 219–242). Davis, CA: Hermagoras.Google Scholar
Davies, L. E.
(1952, Sept 19). Vice presidential nominee says ‘crooks’ attack him; he also delays his train on coast to reply to query on $16,000 aid. Nixon declares he is ‘smeared’ by ‘communists’ on $16,000 fund. New York Times, p. 1.Google Scholar
Excerpts from editorial comment on Nixon special expense fund
(1952, Sept 21). New York Times, p. 78.Google Scholar
Farrell, T. B.
(1989) The carnival as confessional: Re-reading the figurative dimension in Nixon’s ‘Checkers’ speech. In M. C. Leff, & F. J. Kauffeld (Eds.), Texts in contexts: Critical dialogues on significant episodes in American political rhetoric (pp. 243–252). Davis, CA: Hermagoras.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S.
(2002) Messages, functional contexts, and categories of fallacy: Some dialectical and rhetorical considerations. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 119–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
(2006) Nonfallacious rhetorical strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s Daisy ad. Argumentation, 20, 41–442.Google Scholar
(2009) Nonfallacious rhetorical design in argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation. Twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 55–78). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, K. H.
(1996) Packaging the presidency A history and criticism of presidential campaign advertising (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katcher, L.
(1952, Sept. 18). Secret rich men’s trust fund keeps Nixon in style far beyond his salary. New York Post, pp. 3, 26.Google Scholar
Mattson, K.
(2012) Just plain Dick. Richard Nixon’s Checkers speech and the “rocking, socking” election of 1952. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Nation’s press divided on Nixon; disapproval expressed by 2 to 1
(1952, Sept 21). New York Times, p. 1.Google Scholar
Nixon, R. M.
(1952, September 23). Richard Nixon’s “Checkers” speech. [Video]. YouTube. Posted by Miller Center of Public Affairs. University of Virginia. Retrieved from https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=EqjwBDH​-vhYGoogle Scholar
Nixon’s fund itemized; 76 gave $18,235
(1952, Sept 21). New York Herald Tribune, p. 1.Google Scholar
O’Brien, R. W., & Jones, E.
(1976) The night Nixon spoke: A study of political effectiveness. Los Alamitos, CA: Hwong.Google Scholar
Ousting of Nixon demanded by some of Ike’s advisors
(1952, Sept. 20). Boston Globe, p. 1.Google Scholar
Parmet, H. S.
(1990) Richard Nixon and his America.New York: Konecky & Konecky.Google Scholar
Ruark, R.
(1952, Sept. 26). Nixon humanized the GOP. Detroit Free Press, p. 36.Google Scholar
Ryan, H. R.
(1988) Senator Richard M. Nixon’s apology for “The Fund.” In H. R. Ryan (Ed.), Oratorical encounters: Selected studies and sources of twentieth-century political accusations and apologies (pp. 99–120). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Senator cuts trip
(1952, Sept. 22). New York Times, p. 1.Google Scholar
Wicker, T.
(1991) One of us. Richard Nixon and the American dream. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Wills, G.
(1970) Checkers. In Nixon agonistes. The crises of the self-made man (ch. 5, pp. 91–114). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar