Chapter published in:
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 173194
References

References

Boggs, C. E.
(2012) Ecology and revolution. Global crisis and the political challenge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bondi, M., Cacchiani, S., & Mazzi, D.
(Eds.) (2015) Discourse in and through the media. Recontextualizing and reconceptualizing expert discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bortoluzzi, M.
(2010) Energy and its double: A case-study in critical multimodal discourse analysis. In E. Swain (Ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 158–181). Trieste: EUT.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R.
(2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brunner, E. A., & DeLuca, K. M.
(2017) The argumentative force of image networks: Greenpeace’s panmediated Global Detox campaign. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 281–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Catenaccio, P.
(2012) Understanding CSR discourse: Insights from linguistics and discourse analysis. Milano: Arcipelago.Google Scholar
Degano, C.
(2017) Visual arguments in activists’ campaigns. A pragmadialectical perspective. In C. Ilie, & G. Garzone (Eds.), Argumentation across communities of practice (pp. 291–315). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, C.
(2003) [first published 1854]. Hard Times. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H.
(2017) Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns (pp. 7–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F.
(2002) Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, F.
(2007) Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(1989) Language and power. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Garssen, B.
(2001) Argument schemes. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 81–99). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
(2017) The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp. 31–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garzone, G.
(2006) Perspectives on ESP and popularization. Milano: CUEM.Google Scholar
Horton, D.
(2004) Local environmentalism and the internet. Environmental Politics, 13 (4), 734–753. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H.
(Ed.) (2016) The Routledge Handbook of language and creativity. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(2006) Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mattessich, R.
(1978) Instrumental reasoning and systems methodology. An epistemology of the applied and social sciences.Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Munat, J.
(2016) Lexical creativity. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), The routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 92–106). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L.
(2004) Multimodal discourse analysis. Systemic-functional perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wodak, R.
(2009) The discourse of politics in action. Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar