References
Boggs, C. E.
(2012) Ecology and revolution. Global crisis and the political challenge. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bondi, M., Cacchiani, S., & Mazzi, D.
(Eds.) (2015) Discourse in and through the media. Recontextualizing and reconceptualizing expert discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Bortoluzzi, M.
(2010) Energy and its double: A case-study in critical multimodal discourse analysis. In E. Swain (Ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of systemic functional linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 158–181). Trieste: EUT.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R.
(2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brunner, E. A., & DeLuca, K. M.
(2017) The argumentative force of image networks: Greenpeace’s panmediated Global Detox campaign. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 281–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catenaccio, P.
(2012) Understanding CSR discourse: Insights from linguistics and discourse analysis. Milano: Arcipelago.Google Scholar
Degano, C.
(2017) Visual arguments in activists’ campaigns. A pragmadialectical perspective. In C. Ilie, & G. Garzone (Eds.), Argumentation across communities of practice (pp. 291–315). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickens, C.
(2003) [first published 1854]. Hard Times. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H.
(2017) Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns (pp. 7–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, F.
(2002) Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, F.
(2007) Argumentative indicators in discourse. A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(1989) Language and power. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Garssen, B.
(2001) Argument schemes. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 81–99). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
(2017) The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Prototypical argumentative patterns (pp. 31–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzone, G.
(2006) Perspectives on ESP and popularization. Milano: CUEM.Google Scholar
Greenpeace
(2012) Toxic threads: The big fashion stitch-up. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International ([URL]).Google Scholar
(2015) Eleven hazardous chemicals which should be eliminated ([URL]).Google Scholar
(2016) The Detox Catwalk 2016 ([URL]).
Horton, D.
(2004) Local environmentalism and the internet. Environmental Politics, 13 (4), 734–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H.
(Ed.) (2016) The Routledge Handbook of language and creativity. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T.
(2006) Reading images. The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattessich, R.
(1978) Instrumental reasoning and systems methodology. An epistemology of the applied and social sciences.Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Munat, J.
(2016) Lexical creativity. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), The routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 92–106). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. L.
(2004) Multimodal discourse analysis. Systemic-functional perspectives. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wodak, R.
(2009) The discourse of politics in action. Politics as usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Greco, Sara
2023. Twitter Activists’ Argumentation Through Subdiscussions: Theory, Method and Illustration of the Controversy Surrounding Sustainable Fashion. Argumentation 37:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Greco, Sara, Chiara Mercuri, Barbara De Cock & Rebecca Schär
2023. Arguing through best practice: The role of argumentation from example in activists’ social media posts on sustainable fashion. Discourse Studies 25:4  pp. 530 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.