Part of
An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children DiscussionsRebecca G. Schär
[Argumentation in Context 19] 2021
► pp. 63–103
Rebecca G. Schär
[Argumentation in Context 19] 2021
► pp. 63–103
Chapter 5Case studies: The issue in young children’s argumentation in family
Article outline
- 5.1A typology of the emergence of issues in adult-children discussions
- 5.1.1Type 1A: A child problematizes something in an adult’s utterance
- 5.1.1.1The ‘afraid’ case
- 5.1.1.2The ‘ghost’ case
- 5.1.2Discussion of type 1A
- 5.1.3Type 1B: A child problematizes something in an adult’s utterance and
opens up a sub-issue
- 5.1.3.1The ‘pirate’ case
- 5.1.3.2The ‘drinking straw’ case
- 5.1.4Discussion of type 1B
- 5.1.5Type 2A: An adult problematizes something in a child’s
utterance
- 5.1.5.1The ‘jigsaw’ case
- 5.1.6Discussion of type 2A
- 5.1.7Type 2B: An adult problematizes something in a child’s utterance and opens up a sub-issue
- 5.1.8Type 3: A child problematizes something in a peer’s utterance
- 5.1.8.1The ‘net’ case
- 5.1.9Discussion of type 3
- 5.1.10Type 4: A child puts forward a standpoint and an argument supporting
that standpoint
- 5.1.10.1The ‘pencil sharpener’ case
- 5.1.11Discussion of type 4
- 5.1.12Type 5: An adult puts forward a standpoint and an argument supporting that standpoint
- 5.1.1Type 1A: A child problematizes something in an adult’s utterance
- 5.2Concluding remarks on the typology of the emergence of issues in
adult-children discussions
- 5.2.1Decentration in the typology of the emergence of issues in adult-children discussions
-
Notes
